Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

Which Would You Rather Own: Premium LLLL.coms or Premium .in/.co.in

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

$$Domainer

Established Member
Impact
25
I guess it all comes down to which you think will be worth more over time. I know many of you invest in these types of domains, so which would you rather own: Premium LLLL.coms or Premium .in/.co.in domains??

As for myself I can't say beacause I don't own either kind. All of my domains are; 1.) United Arab Emirates, 2.) Go Green/Climate Change and 3.) Asia Casino Gaming. All .coms. But as I said I know alot of you are BIG into LLLL and .in/.co.in., so for all of you guys-- which would you rather have: Premium LLLL.coms or Premium .in/.co.in domains??
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
If for development, to me i think it depends where do i live. if i live in .in zone than in would be preferable. But i live in USA so to have premium 4 letters would be nice enough :). If for resale, than it is totally depends on domain name. sometimes premium .in like (sex.in for example) could be waaaay better to have than 4 letters com :)
 
0
•••
LLLL.com
 
0
•••
you can't compare the two at all. Completely different extensions, completely different categories. LLLL.coms are way more liquid than .in names.
But for me, a super premium .in is much better than the best LLLL.com (CVCV.coms). You can at most get 5-10k for a quality CVCV.com, but a super premium .in, like Casino.in will fetch over a 100k at an auction today. So yes, between Hapa.com and Business.in, I would choose the latter any day. Between Hapa.com and FreeWebCams.in, I will have to go with the former.
 
0
•••
75% for Premium LLLL.com
25% for Premium .in/.co.in
 
0
•••
sashas said:
you can't compare the two at all. Completely different extensions, completely different categories. LLLL.coms are way more liquid than .in names.
But for me, a super premium .in is much better than the best LLLL.com (CVCV.coms). You can at most get 5-10k for a quality CVCV.com, but a super premium .in, like Casino.in will fetch over a 100k at an auction today. So yes, between Hapa.com and Business.in, I would choose the latter any day. Between Hapa.com and FreeWebCams.in, I will have to go with the former.


Great answer, these two types of names are in different categories. But unless the .in is an exceptional word, I would rather have a great LLLL.com.
 
0
•••
Perhaps it would be better to restate the question:

If you had $1000 to invest long-term at today's prices which would you choose?

I would dodge the question by saying I know nothing about the .in market so I would not know a good deal if it bit me. But I like LLLL.coms and would not mind a few - although I think the CVCVs are a bit inflated at the moment.
 
0
•••
.in going up pretty slow.
 
0
•••
Premium - .co.in /.in 300+

llll.com - 7

Does that answer the question.:? :gl:
 
0
•••
godolphin said:
75% for Premium LLLL.com
25% for Premium .in/.co.in

I agree on this. :)
 
0
•••
sashas said:
you can't compare the two at all. Completely different extensions, completely different categories. LLLL.coms are way more liquid than .in names.
But for me, a super premium .in is much better than the best LLLL.com (CVCV.coms). You can at most get 5-10k for a quality CVCV.com, but a super premium .in, like Casino.in will fetch over a 100k at an auction today. So yes, between Hapa.com and Business.in, I would choose the latter any day. Between Hapa.com and FreeWebCams.in, I will have to go with the former.

spot on
:imho:
 
0
•••
I know many of you invest in these types of domains, so which would you rather own: Premium LLLL.coms or Premium .in/.co.in domains??

I would own premium llll.com .... There are many premium sales in the mid $ xxx + category.

.in/co.in will take much more time to really get solid sales
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Appraise.net
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back