What's going on with Epik and Rob Monster?

NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

MapleDots

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
13,186
I'm catching the tail end of this, seems to be some kind of controversy...

https://domaingang.com/domain-news/rob-monster-off-twitter-after-christchurch-massacre-controversy/

Must be something odd to evoke this type of a response from one of our members.

Picture0016.png
 
9
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
If the topic of the "meaning of life" does interest someone, I do hope that a relatively uncensored internet exists so that they have a reasonable chance of searching the truth without being propagandized.

We still live in countries where we are allowed to decide (1) what to believe, and (2) what questions to ask. Where it gets complicated is when we can no longer find satisfactory/conclusive answers.

somehow you manage to promote epik services in every post

which I personally find disgusting
 
0
•••
somehow you manage to promote epik services in every post

which I personally find disgusting

Says the guy who promotes NameCheap in his signature with 3 posts in a row.
 
0
•••
Says the guy who promotes NameCheap in his signature with 3 posts in a row.

Right. It is just a NamePros signature. I rarely update it. There is no way to turn it off for every post.

I doubt the SEO value of NamePros is all that high.

As for this thread, it is mostly an echo-chamber with a fairly small group of followers.

As for my replies to Frank, I am actually trying to be helpful. He seems to have this strongly held view that people who believe that consider the possibility of a divine authority are mentally challenged.

Anyway, my mind is fine and I would be open to speaking with anyone via phone or video who still thinks there is something amiss with my mind. :)
 
0
•••
Right. It is just a NamePros signature. I rarely update it. There is no way to turn it off for every post.

I doubt the SEO value of NamePros is all that high.

As for this thread, it is mostly an echo-chamber with a fairly small group of followers.

As for my replies to Frank, I am actually trying to be helpful. He seems to have this strongly held view that people who believe that consider the possibility of a divine authority are mentally challenged.

Anyway, my mind is fine and I would be open to speaking with anyone via phone or video who still thinks there is something amiss with my mind. :)


I wasn't referring to your sig
 
0
•••
Right. It is just a NamePros signature. I rarely update it. There is no way to turn it off for every post.

I doubt the SEO value of NamePros is all that high.

This might be beside the point, but just to clarify, signatures are hidden for logged-out visitors, including search engines, so they have no SEO value--this is deliberate.
 
4
•••
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmos
The cosmos (UK: /ˈkɒzmɒs/, US: /-moʊs/) is the universe. Using the word cosmos rather than the word universe implies viewing the universe as a complex and orderly system or entity; the opposite of chaos.[1] The cosmos, and our understanding of the reasons for its existence and significance, are studied in cosmology.


https://www.iep.utm.edu/presocra/
Presocratics
Presocratic philosophers are the Western thinkers preceding Socrates (c. 469-c. 399 B.C.E.) but including some thinkers who were roughly contemporary with Socrates, such as Protagoras (c. 490-c. 420 B.C.E.). The application of the term “philosophy” to the Presocratics is somewhat anachronistic, but is certainly different from how many people currently think of philosophy. The Presocratics were interested in a wide variety of topics, especially in what we now think of as natural science rather than philosophy. These early thinkers often sought naturalistic explanations and causes for physical phenomena.


Such an emphasis on physical explanations marked a break with more traditional ways of thinking that indicated the gods as primary causes. The Presocratics, in most cases, did not entirely abandon theistic or religious notions, but they characteristically posed challenges to traditional ways of thinking.

The Milesians
While it might be inaccurate to call them a school of thinkers, the Milesian philosophers do have connections that are not merely geographical. Hailing from Miletus in Ionia (modern day Turkey), Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes each broke with the poetic and mythological tradition handed down by Hesiod and Homer. With what little we know about the Milesians, we do not consider them philosophers in the same way that we consider Plato, Aristotle, and their successors philosophers. Much of what we know about them suggests that they were protoscientists, concerned with cosmogony, which was the generation of the cosmos; and cosmology, the study of or inquiry into the nature of the cosmos. Their cosmogonies and cosmologies are oriented primarily by naturalistic explanations, descriptions, and conjectures, rather than traditional mythology.




Aristotle tried to find "principles and causes"
Aristotelian physics is a form of natural science described in the works of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BCE). In his work Physics, Aristotle intended to establish general principles of change that govern all natural bodies, both living and inanimate, celestial and terrestrial – including all motion (change with respect to place), quantitative change (change with respect to size or number), qualitative change, and substantial change ("coming to be" (coming into existence, "generation") or "passing away" (no longer existing, "corruption")).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_(Aristotle)
..a collection of treatises or lessons that deal with the most general (philosophical) principles of natural or moving things, both living and non-living, rather than physical theories (in the modern sense) or investigations of the particular contents of the universe. The chief purpose of the work is to discover the principles and causes of (and not merely to describe) change, or movement, or motion (κίνησις kinesis), especially that of natural wholes (mostly living things, but also inanimate wholes like the cosmos).

Doesn't mean he had a great method or was coming to correct conclusions, but he was trying to write how the world works



Seems all these people were able to conceptualize an ordered world, cosmos, and a natural origin of it.... and seek principles of how it functions.... without a monotheistic religion
 
0
•••
I wasn't referring to your sig

Should Rob not talk about Epik, even though the subject of this thread is "What's going on with EPIK and Rob Monster? That would be odd.

Or should Rob talk about Epik only in a disparaging way, saying how terrible it is? He is, after all, the CEO of the company with a duty to make Epik a good company for the sake of shareholders, employees, partners, and customers. But if he talks about the ways in which Epik is good, you will criticize him for promoting Epik.

In fact, you call it "disgusting".

somehow you manage to promote epik services in every post

which I personally find disgusting

When Rob talks about Epik, people criticize him for promoting Epik. And when he talks about topics unrelated to Epik the domain registrar – such as his personal beliefs – people criticize him for injecting those personal beliefs into the discussion.

Either way, he will get criticized. And often in both directions from the same people.

That doesn't mean there's nothing to criticize. But I personally prefer criticism that's fair and targeted. It's more effective than criticism that treats good and bad things as equally deserving of censure.
 
1
•••
Doesn't mean he had a great method or was coming to correct conclusions, but he was trying to write how the world works

Seems all these people were able to conceptualize an ordered world, cosmos, and a natural origin of it.... and seek principles of how it functions.... without a monotheistic religion

Without a doubt, ancient Greek philosophy was progress. But you can already see the beginnings of later monotheism in Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, even though they weren't quite monotheists at that stage. They left far behind the chaos of the gods from the Homeric epics or the daily life of their time.

Xenophanes famously declared that if lions, horeses, and cattle could paint, they would paint gods in the form of lions, horses, and cattle. He was ridiculing the anthropomorphic polytheism of his day. Xenophanes was a skeptic. But he stressed that he believe in

"one God, greatest among gods and humans, like mortals neither in form nor in thought"

Socrates (as recorded by Plato) often refers to "God" in the singular. And when he refers to plural gods, Socrates is implying that there is something above them:

"is something holy because the gods like it, or do the gods like it because it's holy?"

Aristotle spent a lifetime categorizing a diverse world. Definitely, he wanted Order. This came from his religious concepts, in which the gods are "unmoved movers". Aristotle's penchant for classification and verbal subdivisions ended up with 4 kinds of Cause. He conjectured about the relationship between Substance and Form, Actuality and Potential. That implies an orderly, categorized world.

Aristotle still believed in various gods. But the concept of a "prime mover" comes from Aristotle. And that, in and of itself, is a step toward later monotheism.

There's a reason why Aristotle and Plato were absorbed so easily in Plotinus and by the gnostics and later by muslims and the christian scholastics during the middle ages. They are on a continuum of evolution from ancient polytheism toward later monotheism.
 
0
•••
Seems all these people were able to conceptualize an ordered world, cosmos, and a natural origin of it.... and seek principles of how it functions.... without a monotheistic religion

For sure, there is a long and storied history of highly intelligent people who were able to develop theories and constructs to explain away the existence of natural laws, fulfillment of prophecy, and supernatural miracles. Einstein's theory of Relativity and Darwin's theory of Evolution are both examples. This is "science". That is also the reason why the Bible, in both the old and new Testament, differentiates between knowledge and wisdom. A person can can definitely have the one and not the other.

Here is is one example:


Incidentally, Nikola Tesla, who roundly debunked Einstein, was raised an Orthodox Christian. His writing on faith demonstrate someone who was enlightened and tolerant. Tesla was absolutely a genius but he also gave credit to where credit was due.

upload_2019-5-30_19-2-28.png


It appears that Nikola Tesla had extreme amounts of knowledge and wisdom. The irony is that now most people think "Tesla" is a car company led by Elon Musk, and more kids are likely to write biographies about Elon Musk (no comment) versus Nikola Tesla (a true genius). And that is how propaganda works.
 
0
•••
highly intelligent people who were able to develop theories and constructs to explain away the existence of natural laws, fulfillment of prophecy, and supernatural miracles. Einstein's theory of Relativity and Darwin's theory of Evolution are both examples. This is "science".

Incidentally, Nikola Tesla, who roundly debunked Einstein

Out of curiosity, what portions of Einstein's Theory of Relativity do you consider to be false?

I'm accustomed to conservative christians rejecting Evolution. But this – like rejecting a spherical earth – is new to me.

As you know, Rob, I supervised nuclear power plants for years. None of that splitting atom stuff works without E = mc^2.

Was it a hoax? If so, how did my submarine produce electricity and avoid sinking for months on end? We all spent years studying the nuclear power plant and the physics involved down to the tiniest – joke intended – detail. Maybe we were all deceived. But in that case, who was hidden in the boat making it all work by some other method? And behind what curtain was this Wizard of Oz hiding?
 
0
•••
Incidentally, submarines have been traversing the north pole underneath the ice (and often breaching the ice) since the Nautilus did it in 1958. I personally know plenty of submariners who have done it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nautilus_(SSN-571)

And at sea, we can all see the curvature of the planet with the naked eye. A distant ship on the horizon appears only as its mast. The hull and deck are hidden behind the curvature of the earth. I've seen it plenty of times through a periscope. People who haven't spent much time staring at the open ocean looking for distant ships to run away from might not have noticed. But you can see it in photos online.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
It appears that Nikola Tesla had extreme amounts of knowledge and wisdom.

He was truly gifted for sure...did a report on him as a youth that went 3 times beyond the required amount of pages...he was fascinating. What became of much of his research, experiments and writings after his death should be made into a movie...but I doubt it will.

The things Einstein ultimately gave us through his math are staggering...on my journey I have determined the Creator was, and is, the ultimate mathematician...our existence (matter, energy, cosmos) can all be reduced to mathematical equations all the way back to the big bang (1st picosecond) but break down at that point. To me that is the point at which God initiated our existence (regardless of any timeline).
 
1
•••
He was truly gifted for sure...did a report on him as a youth that went 3 times beyond the required amount of pages...he was fascinating. What became of much of his research, experiments and writings after his death should be made into a movie...but I doubt it will.

The things Einstein ultimately gave us through his math are staggering...on my journey I have determined the Creator was, and is, the ultimate mathematician...our existence (matter, energy, cosmos) can all be reduced to mathematical equations all the way back to the big bang (1st picosecond) but break down at that point. To me that is the point at which God initiated our existence (regardless of any timeline).

Good stuff. Music is math. Good intro here.


And here:


And yet there are still people who think the universe is the product of randomness. Anyone who thinks that is lying to themselves. Plain and simple.
 
3
•••
For sure, there is a long and storied history of highly intelligent people who were able to develop theories and constructs to explain away the existence of natural laws, fulfillment of prophecy, and supernatural miracles. Einstein's theory of Relativity and Darwin's theory of Evolution are both examples. This is "science". That is also the reason why the Bible, in both the old and new Testament, differentiates between knowledge and wisdom. A person can can definitely have the one and not the other.

Here is is one example:


Incidentally, Nikola Tesla, who roundly debunked Einstein, was raised an Orthodox Christian. His writing on faith demonstrate someone who was enlightened and tolerant. Tesla was absolutely a genius but he also gave credit to where credit was due.

Show attachment 120286

It appears that Nikola Tesla had extreme amounts of knowledge and wisdom. The irony is that now most people think "Tesla" is a car company led by Elon Musk, and more kids are likely to write biographies about Elon Musk (no comment) versus Nikola Tesla (a true genius). And that is how propaganda works.


yes I admire Tesla too.

Elon Musk
does so too.

The name of the tesla motor company was choosen
to honor this guy
and keep his memory alive
- as far as I know-

how can this serve as a proof of your like a 5 years old child world view
of a human like creator in the skys???
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Good stuff. Music is math. Good intro here.


And here:


And yet there are still people who think the universe is the product of randomness. Anyone who thinks that is lying to themselves. Plain and simple.


interesting

lets recall
you take this to prove there must be a creator ..


let's ignore the fact that the first video has chosen
to select really doubtful "music" to "entertain" us....

and move on directly to the proof of
"the creator of the universe must be a mathematician"


the universe has humor
so let me tell you that I'm a musician ...

... just yesterday I came across this video




it explains why
your video is based on wrong presumptions
and therefore can't prove anything


I'm quite sure the same is true for all your ideas
but I can't be asked to debunk them all

you will need a little intelligence of your own.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Incidentally, submarines have been traversing the north pole underneath the ice (and often breaching the ice) since the Nautilus did it in 1958. I personally know plenty of submariners who have done it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nautilus_(SSN-571)

And at sea, we can all see the curvature of the planet with the naked eye. A distant ship on the horizon appears only as its mast. The hull and deck are hidden behind the curvature of the earth. I've seen it plenty of times through a periscope. People who haven't spent much time staring at the open ocean looking for distant ships to run away from might not have noticed. But you can see it in photos online.

I am not planning to be an apologist for the "flat earth" view but to address your points here:

1. The flat earth thesis is unipolar -- a magnetic north at the center and an outer ice wall. So, yes, traversing the north pole would be possible but, in the flat earth model, the south pole is essentially unfindable.

upload_2019-5-31_10-56-5.png


2. The disappearing mast over the horizon can be explained by perspective. A high zoom camera like a Nikon P900 is cheap these days. There is even 1200X zoom now combining optics and magnification which allow consumers to extend the horizon dramatically. More here:


The topic is certainly an interesting mental exercise, e.g. if the world were to be unipolar, then one could be constantly orienting east/west at 90 degrees of due north and you would go in a circle, i.e. you could circumnavigate the flat earth by going due east or due west and end up where you started.

Good luck.
 
1
•••
The flat earth thesis is unipolar -- a magnetic north at the center and an outer ice wall. So, yes, traversing the north pole would be possible but, in the flat earth model, the south pole is essentially unfindable.

OK. That makes sense. Traversing the north pole is not impossible in a flat-earth world.

I'm not sure I understand the geometry of a flat earth. Does this sound like the right model, in your view?

- The earth is flat and circular like a vinyl record.
- It's finite with an edge.
- North is in the center.
- South is at the edge in all directions (360 degrees).
- Moving north means moving toward the center.
- Moving south means moving away from the center, toward the edge.
- Moving west means traveling clockwise in a circle around the North center.
- Moving east means traveling counterclockwise in a circle around the North center.

That much I can understand. But where is the sun? And how does the sun move?

Would it be correct to say that the sun is somewhere above the vinyl record? At least during the day. That would explain how the sun shines down on the earth, and how we see it above us in the sky.

But in that case, if the sun is above the vinyl record, the sun will shine down on the whole world all at once. It will be daytime everywhere on the planet at the same time. I could put a gummy bear on vinyl record, as a stand-in for some human being. And we could always draw a straight line of sight between the gummy bear and the sun, if the sun is somewhere above the vinyl record during daylight hours.

That would have been plausible prior to the invention of the telegram, telephone, or wifi. Primitive man could easily assume that daytime was daytime everywhere in the world at once, and night was night everywhere in the world at once.

But, Rob, you have traveled all over the world. And you do conference calls all the time. You know that daytime in Tokyo is night elsewhere. So this flat earth model with a sun shining down on the whole vinyl disc is incompatible with your own daily experience.

Another thing that confuses me: What is a sunset or sunrise? In a flat earth model, how does that work?

Do we imagine the sun being above the vinyl disc during the day and beneath the vinyl disc during the night? So the sun moves in a circle above and below the vinyl disc, crossing beneath the edge at sunset and rising above the edge at night?

If that is how the flat earth model works, then I'm confused. If the sun passes from above to below the plane of the vinyl record during sunset, and from below to above the plane of the vinyl record during sunrise, then where does that occur? It's happening at some particular point beyond the edge of the disc. Where exactly?

Based on the flat-earth map you showed in the last post, Africa is on the left; South america is at the top; North America is on the right; and Australia is at the bottom. This is just arbitrary, since left / right / top / bottom have no real meaning. But it will help us get oriented regarding this sunset / sunrise question.

Let's say the sun dips beneath the edge of the flat disc earth on the LEFT and rises above the edge on the RIGHT. That means someone in Africa (which is on the left) would see a sunset happen directly South (toward the edge) and a sunrise directly North (toward the center). Meanwhile someone in North America (which is on the right) would see a sunset happen directly North (toward the center) and a sunrise directly South (toward the edge).

Yet how is that consistent with the daily experience of human beings everywhere in the world? We see the sun rise in the East and set in the West. In a flat-earth world, it seems there is no possible motion of the sun that could result in that observable fact.

In the north of Norway in the summer, the sun never sets. It just dips its toe in the water and rises again. It's a common sight. I've personally seen it. But I have no clue how that would be explained in a flat-earth world.

And the seasons?

I would challenge anybody to build a kindergarten model of a flat-earth world that can explain basic day-to-day facts like sunrise and sunset, the seasons, lack of any sunset, or time zones. It's not just a false theory. It's an incoherent theory. Geometrically impossible.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
The topic is certainly an interesting mental exercise,...


yes
very interesting indeed

like counting to billion and backwards


but utter nonsense
as you know
and admitted


so why do keep on posting nonsense?

there must be a reason
other than promoting your GOD


I suspect
you to distract from
that fact that you are promoting gab
( in including links to gab in every 3rd post )
 
0
•••
yes
very interesting indeed

like counting to billion and backwards


but utter nonsense
as you know
and admitted


so why do keep on posting nonsense?

there must be a reason
other than promoting your GOD


I suspect
you to distract from
that fact that you are promoting gab
( in including links to gab in every 3rd post )

I think we are probably living in parallel universes because I don't recall linking to Gab in this thread. I rarely even mention Gab for that matter. Nor am I a stakeholder there.

I also think my references to Epik products and services are relatively infrequent, and besides the thread is about Epik so it is actually on point.

As for what is true, it is always absolute. Our discovery and understanding of truth is a journey. The challenge is to know when you know something for certain, and when you have a hypothesis.

I would not want to be what the Bible calls:

upload_2019-5-31_13-47-17.png


Anyway, if you are going to accuse me, at least use facts. Otherwise you lose credibility, not just in this thread, but generally.
 
1
•••
OK. That makes sense. Traversing the north pole is not impossible in a flat-earth world.

I'm not sure I understand the geometry of a flat earth. Does this sound like the right model, in your view?

- The earth is flat and circular like a vinyl record.
- It's finite with an edge.
- North is in the center.
- South is at the edge in all directions (360 degrees).
- Moving north means moving toward the center.
- Moving south means moving away from the center, toward the edge.
- Moving west means traveling clockwise in a circle around the North center.
- Moving east means traveling counterclockwise in a circle around the North center.

That much I can understand. But where is the sun? And how does the sun move?

Would it be correct to say that the sun is somewhere above the vinyl record? At least during the day. That would explain how the sun shines down on the earth, and how we see it above us in the sky.

But in that case, if the sun is above the vinyl record, the sun will shine down on the whole world all at once. It will be daytime everywhere on the planet at the same time. I could put a gummy bear on vinyl record, as a stand-in for some human being. And we could always draw a straight line of sight between the gummy bear and the sun, if the sun is somewhere above the vinyl record during daylight hours.

That would have been plausible prior to the invention of the telegram, telephone, or wifi. Primitive man could easily assume that daytime was daytime everywhere in the world at once, and night was night everywhere in the world at once.

But, Rob, you have traveled all over the world. And you do conference calls all the time. You know that daytime in Tokyo is night elsewhere. So this flat earth model with a sun shining down on the whole vinyl disc is incompatible with your own daily experience.

Another thing that confuses me: What is a sunset or sunrise? In a flat earth model, how does that work?

Do we imagine the sun being above the vinyl disc during the day and beneath the vinyl disc during the night? So the sun moves in a circle above and below the vinyl disc, crossing beneath the edge at sunset and rising above the edge at night?

If that is how the flat earth model works, then I'm confused. If the sun passes from above to below the plane of the vinyl record during sunset, and from below to above the plane of the vinyl record during sunrise, then where does that occur? It's happening at some particular point beyond the edge of the disc. Where exactly?

Based on the flat-earth map you showed in the last post, Africa is on the left; South america is at the top; North America is on the right; and Australia is at the bottom. This is just arbitrary, since left / right / top / bottom have no real meaning. But it will help us get oriented regarding this sunset / sunrise question.

Let's say the sun dips beneath the edge of the flat disc earth on the LEFT and rises above the edge on the RIGHT. That means someone in Africa (which is on the left) would see a sunset happen directly South (toward the edge) and a sunrise directly North (toward the center). Meanwhile someone in North America (which is on the right) would see a sunset happen directly North (toward the center) and a sunrise directly South (toward the edge).

Yet how is that consistent with the daily experience of human beings everywhere in the world? We see the sun rise in the East and set in the West. In a flat-earth world, it seems there is no possible motion of the sun that could result in that observable fact.

In the north of Norway in the summer, the sun never sets. It just dips its toe in the water and rises again. It's a common sight. I've personally seen it. But I have no clue how that would be explained in a flat-earth world.

And the seasons?

I would challenge anybody to build a kindergarten model of a flat-earth world that can explain basic day-to-day facts like sunrise and sunset, the seasons, lack of any sunset, or time zones. It's not just a false theory. It's an incoherent theory. Geometrically impossible.

Joseph - you are definitely going down the rabbit hole now. As I said, I am not going to be an apologist for the Flat Earth theory, but you are asking all the right questions, and for which there is an abundance of answers from guys who are about this topic, e.g. guys like Jeranism, Eric Dubay, Rob Skiba, etc..

pBMyo3B2SaoC4ZRzyPFS6GjuPkpgZWRpnz35x1qNXoSt4WYL6r2sERK3CNVFhP9akDnMouBiatrfSpZ15T7tZAaPAreRaTm38tDNsC3jVq3pcpC5uDJ6xHsCkkUZpR4fHBzQmDoT835c6MH6FsZ3BzJbn87NeoQPDvzZBCMEM1x5swsB
 
1
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back