IT.COM

discuss What is your opinion in xyz extension?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

domainsg

Established Member
Impact
61
what is your opinion in xyz extension?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
It's because the naysayers said they would never hit over a million regs and now they have and they still don't understand what's happening. ;)
That might be the reason then. The only extension they talk about is .xyz, you dont see people talking about any other extension and saying bad things about it. Also also the verisign thing lol.
 
0
•••
It's because the naysayers said they would never hit over a million regs and now they have and they still don't understand what's happening. ;)

I am sure the discussion here is not about the number of registrations a domain extension (.xyz) achieves, it's more like when few fellow members predict that .xyz will outclass .com in near future. In my opinion, it's not gonna happen.

But we can all agree to disagree here, right mate!

Cheers,
 
0
•••
0
•••
Daniel Negari from his own ceo.xyz website.
ps : Im totally agree with him in this case.
he said that ;

With a domain name from .xyz or another new gTLD, end users have the flexibility to establish and promote their brand, while also improving their visibility in search engine rankings. Carefully considering your domain name is a cost-effective, strategic business decision that can help you get found by your customers.

New gTLDs will rank in Google, assuming that you utilize keywords and domains related to your business. When supplemented with quality content on your site, your websites on a new domain extension will rank well on search engines.
 
0
•••
hell yes, 5 years in cold storage for me. POCKET.XYZ and YALE.XYZ and YELP.XYZ, FENDER.XYZ, CAESAR.XYZ MOZART.XYZ AND ALL THE OTHERS, will remained locked away until that day i will need it the most. This is great news, there is actual prices on those sales. Still I want to see those numbers increase too with 1 word premium names. NNN and LLL are cool, but it needs to be more than that, in time I guesss.
 
0
•••
I don't know about the future of .xyz I know that I have real good names but 0 offers or asking price
 
0
•••
0
•••
.XYZ sales should increase when they're approved in China early next year. I'm holding some very nice LLL chips such as CHP.xyz which should bring decent returns next year. I predict LLL, NNN, and even combinations of NLN and LNL will be good investments. Short keywords should follow...

http://www.domaininvesting.com/daniel-negari-comments-9-xyz/
 
0
•••
What do you think about my xyz?
 
0
•••
.xyz is a slam dunk. It has major retention with customers, a youthful appeal and plenty of selection.
Seriously, if it is good enough for Larry Page & Google to invest $250,000 USD in abc.xyz than it is good enough for ANY company. That vote of confidence from the most important internet company was a "drop the mic" moment that solidified .xyz going forward.

In my opinion, we domainers shouldn't compare Google using .xyz with the popularity of this extension. To Google, it made a perfect "sense" for their brand/holding company and also because this name "was available". (ABC dot com wasn't, neither was Alphabet dot com). So Google using .xyz is an exception. PERIOD.

I also have couple of .xyz's (less than five) and frankly I think the extension has nothing to do with "who" is using it, instead "how" it is being used (for branding purposes that makes sense, yes like Google's abc.xyz).

So if a domain that makes a perfect sense to be used with .xyz extension, I will surely be regging it. But unfortunately, that is not the case here. The majority of .xyz domains I see here of fellow domainers are not worth investing and I would suggest domainers not to take any hype seriously unless you personally believe in the name you are about to purchase.

Just my two cents.
 
0
•••
A small number of sales has no bearing on the general value of a TLD. There are probably high priced sales on most/nearly all possible TLDs out there, that doesn't mean they are suddenly going to be bought regularly for good prices.

And the example xyz sales are very unique domains, and so not even any real bearing on the extension's value in general. And they're not even high prices - look at "87.xyz $15,433". 87.com would be (at least) 100 times that.

So .com is 100 times the value of .xyz
We know .com is about 10 times the value of .net
See where .xyz fits in currently? And that's the high value xyz, the general sales like 2 really good words fetch very little, where in .com the same two good words fetch $xxx with little effort, $x,xxx or more if in the right hands.


Forget one off sales, regardless of price. View DNJournal for a few hours and you'll frown at some of the domain names sold for mid $xx,xxx or more. There are always exceptions to the rule, and the actual value of a TLD from a domain trader's point of view is the frequency of sales & sale prices, and currently xyz sale frequency is very low, and the sale prices are extremely low.


I think xyz will become popular, not as much as .com, or perhaps even net, but people are looking for this to happen now, and it's at least a year away for frequent low $xxx sales, a few years for them to become tradeable from a business point of view.
 
0
•••
I am sure that Abc.xyz was the "only" brandable option left for Google to go with (the keyword being "brandable" here).

Secondly, the point I see is not whether .xyz is a better extension or not, but the majority of this argument is based on few comments from fellow members here who predicted that .xyz will outrank ..com in couple of years. Again my friends, not gonna happen.
 
0
•••
On the general discussion thread one can see that only about one tenth of 1% of Google's domain holdings are .XYZ

.COM is about 40% with .Net and .Org about 10% each and a number of CCTLDs in the mix
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Flawed argument. New gTLDs are not new technology, they work exactly like the 'old' extensions. Nothing more, nothing less.
Hyundai cars in the 1990's worked just like Mercedes. Both offered A to B transportation except the Mercedes was more prestigious.

If you rely on estibot you have everything to learn.
Estibot is part of my evaluation process. It isn't perfect but it provides a pretty good indication of what names have potential and which ones don't.

This isn't my first rodeo. I'm not spending money, I'm making an investment. Every investment with great potential also has the potential to lose some or all of the investment. The names will either appreciate in value or they will not. I think in 10 years the names will be significantly more valuable than today. My cost basis is so low that it would be difficult for me to lose unless the internet changes and domain names aren't needed anymore. That could happen but in my opinion, not likely.
 
0
•••
It SOUNDS and LOOKS like SPAM !

+ The non-technical world doesn't understand that .xyz is a domain extension.

I believe there are better alternatives out there :)
I agree with this. Because on my email daily comes spam from .xyz sites.
 
0
•••
Go ask everyone you know: "Hey, what is abc.xyz" and when more than half of them ask "what is a dot xyz?" and the remaining few just state "No idea", then you understand why Alphabet buying a dot xyz is not as big as some say it is.
Even if they know that "Alphabet" is the mother company for Google, they won't necessarily know of abc.xyz, and also many will just think the xyz is something special Google have cooked up.

I'm not saying it's entirely meaningless, it may send some small ripples out there, but it's not some magic wand which will suddenly make xyz TLD more trade-able. And this is not "only" here-say, it's based on previous occurrences with other TLDs, like Kate has pointed out, and more.


Have a looksie here:
http://namebio.com/?s=gM5UTO1kjM

Starts out well at high figures, but only a tiny number of high figure sales. The list then on the first page goes to "deals.xyz" for $8K and by page 3 (so the top 27 reported xyz sales) we get to "stocks.xyz" for a tiny $1K.

When the TLD is selling regularly at good prices, hundreds per day, or even per week, then you can say xyz is doing well.



Imagine Alphabet suddenly using "abc.pooface", are you saying that TLD will suddenly be valuable and traded amongst millions of domainers and business? ;)

You should do some research and see what BankLoans was bought for ? In the past people didn't know anything about the Internet; that is rapidly changing. It doesn't have to be about .XYZ... It's all GTLDs in general. They all have their own value. Some are strange and not adopted and some like XYZ just fit the bill. Period
 
0
•••
Of course the timeframe was 1998 and not many understood the value or potential of domain names like Rick Schwartz did.


https://web.archive.org/web/19981202074137/http://www.webspaces.com/

Domain Name Price (USD)
AGRICULTURAL.COM $ 2,000
AIRSERVICE.COM $ 1,000
ALTERATIONS.COM $ 1,500
ALUMINUMSIDING.COM $ 1,000
ANTIQUESTORES.COM $ 1,000
ASPIRINS.COM $ 2,000
BANKCARDS.COM $ 3,000
BANKLOANS.COM $ 1,000
BEAUTYSHOPS.COM
 
0
•••
I cannot find what BankLoans.xyz sold for, and nor does it matter.

Hundreds of high values sales does not make a TLD worth trading in or valuable, it makes a few names in that TLD valuable.

Casino.xyz - BankLoans.xyz, sure these can be worth something now, but they're super premium keywords, and these are worth something in any TLD! Who ever heard of .vu? Yet casino.vu - $2,500 - 2011.

That was 5 years ago, so is .vu suddenly booming in trade now? Or was that sale simply because it was super-uper-duper premium keyword and not a reflection of 'things to come' for .vu? There is no reason the same will not happen for xyz. SuperPremiumKeywords.xyz will sell for high value, but that has no bearing on the general sale of xyz and "normal" keywords and names in that TLD!


Here are sales of xyz:
http://namebio.com/?s=gM5UTO1kjM
From name 1 down to 10, page 1, the sale price goes from $175K to $8K.

Compared to .com:
http://namebio.com/?s=AN5EDO5kjM
We're still in the $millions by page 10!


Let's stop making comparisons between xyz and com, even future hopes!

Hope
is a wonderful thing, but false hope will only end in disappointment ;)

Lol. Stop you right there. Not bankloans.xyz ... The .com ... Click the link I wrote above and you'll see what my point is. In 1998 people said to Schwartz you'd be an idiot to invest in a name you can see in you're URL. Lol. Now look who's laughing. He invested a couple thousand and now he's a multi millionaire
 
0
•••
Lol. Stop you right there. Not bankloans.xyz ... The .com ... Click the link I wrote above and you'll see what my point is. In 1998 people said to Schwartz you'd be an idiot to invest in a name you can see in you're URL. Lol. Now look who's laughing. He invested a couple thousand and now he's a multi millionaire

I therefore have no idea what point you are making, sorry. You are saying "take a look at how much BankLoans.com sold for"? So what is your point, we already know .com is strong and valuable?

We're discussing xyz, which is why I presumed that is the TLD you meant as you did not make it clear :)
 
0
•••
I therefore have no idea what point you are making, sorry. You are saying "take a look at how much BankLoans.com sold for"? So what is your point, we already know .com is strong and valuable?

We're discussing xyz, which is why I presumed that is the TLD you meant as you did not make it clear :)

*face palm

Bankloans.com sold for $1500 in 1998.

What's it worth now ?

You getting my point; "you and you're entourage call investing in XYZ, the same to burning money but I call it investing."

I have debated with several of the anti gtld members here and there's always no room to argue. I own Heart.Surgery "I think it's a six figure name but only time will tell..." I own Wines.XYZ and Whiskey.XYZ "I think those are very strong investments." You know liquid domains like LLL and NNN and there counterparts have the resell factor to a tee but now all that needs to happen is for more existing companies to rebrand as a .XYZ and I am not talking about Google. I am talking about companies that the middle class consumers follow such as Cocacola & McDonald's ! Boy that would be something else. Pepsi did something similar in their vintage years with X & Y & Z but imagine if they came back ! Call it dreaming but I see the true American Dream for what it is ! Invest & win or Be fearful and lose ....
 
0
•••
Stick with the .COM's .

Short and sweet; I like it ! Did you ever make six figures by writing one sentence down my friend ? You too can be afraid all you want because that's what it is in the long run "I am so fearful because other cctlds and gtlds have failed in their quest to become part of internet history so instead of buying Paper.xyz I'll buy Bigpapers.com" "oh yea that will surely work in bringing in me an Internet audience to voice my products to in the paper printing business." "Or no wait ! Even better I'll see my kids college funds and buy paper1.com" "it's not paper, but who cares these days."

Their is no room in the CCtld world to buy premium names anymore and if there is show me some with a good price. Thousands is fair but hundreds of thousands for a generic word is just ...... "I say look towards the future" and then maybe we can have in ten years another gentleman to introduce yet again another Tld that people will call a waste of investment when the last proved more successful then the other.
"Was the same said for .Net and .Org." Lol.
 
0
•••
Bankloans.com sold for $1500 in 1998.
What's it worth now ?
You getting my point
Not sure as you're too busy slapping your face onto your palms and being cryptic, why not just come out and say your point?

As you face-palmed when I stated "we already know .com is valuable" and you now argue in favour of new TLDs, I can only presume your point to be:
"In 1998 BankLoans.com sold for $1500 but is worth more (6 figures or more) now, therefore xyz will do the same and be worth lots one day"

Right? Or do you mean "certain" such as super premium will be worth something? I already said that.



I have debated with several of the anti gtld members here and there's always no room to argue. I own Heart.Surgery "I think it's a six figure name but only time will tell..." I own Wines.XYZ and Whiskey.XYZ "I think those are very strong investments."

Yes yes, all possible. Super mega premium keywords will be worth value in any TLD. This has no reflection or bearing on the rest of the TLD names, such as "HousesForSaleNewYork.xyz" etc.

Premium keywords are premium and "premium" dictates high value, however the value of everything else in a TLD is determined by the overall value of the TLD which itself is determined by frequency and price of sales - ie 500 to 1,000 sales per week at $x,xxx or more. And the value of those premiums or a few other high sales because some end user had high desire and fat wallet has no bearing on the overall value.



Invest & win or Be fearful and lose ....
Or, invest and lose... a very real potential and a frequent occurrence among domainers.
 
0
•••
Not sure as you're too busy slapping your face onto your palms and being cryptic, why not just come out and say your point?

As you face-palmed when I stated "we already know .com is valuable" and you now argue in favour of new TLDs, I can only presume your point to be:
"In 1998 BankLoans.com sold for $1500 but is worth more (6 figures or more) now, therefore xyz will do the same and be worth lots one day"

Right? Or do you mean "certain" such as super premium will be worth something? I already said that.





Yes yes yes. Super mega premium keywords will be worth value in any TLD. This has no reflection or bearing on the rest of the TLD names, such as "HousesForSale.xyz" etc.

Premium keywords are premium and "premium" dictates high value, however the value of everything else in a TLD is determined by the overall value of the TLD which itself is determined by frequency and price of sales - ie 500 to 1,000 sales per week at $x,xxx or more. And the value of those premiums or a few other high sales because some end user had high desire and fat wallet has no bearing on the overall value.




Or, invest and lose... a very real potential and a frequent occurrence among domainers.

Haha "I like you're style" ! Forgive me for the facepalms ... you're right about the keywords and yea I do agree with you that certain phrases and keywords won't be worth anything and yes those who don't do their research will lose .... A lot.

But unfortunately theirs nothing we can do to stop bad investing, lol. and I mean bad investing like Bananna123.xyz ... Or Applesauce777.com ... Either way people will invest poorly in GTLD and TLD and CCTLD ...
 
0
•••
But he bought .com, not .xyz...


Okay I get it. Schwartz looked like a fool in 1995, but he was a visionary and he ultimately won and retired to the sun.
So you think you're the next Schwartz just because you look like a fool today (or hopeful) ? That the dotcom boom will repeat again ?
People have placed bets on previously-released extensions and failed.

A few sales doesn't mean a market will take shape, and the TLD will be really successful, that is embraced by end users.
If there is no market, then you could still make sales if you are lucky, but this is getting closer to playing lottery than investment.

Also, when Schwartz was buying domain names in the early days (1995), there were few options: .com/.net and .org (if you are non-profit). Few ccTLDs were open and easy to get at that time. .com became the default extension and still is. Now there is a lot more choice, but not all options are equal. .xyz is certainly not at the top of the list.

There's a time for everything and if there's a will there's a way.
 
0
•••
My opinion on any new extension is the top keywords might be worth an investment. But I'd be cautious on going past 1-2 word dead on keyword domains.

http://domainnamewire.com/2015/12/29/2015-in-review-new-tlds/

***Disclaimer*** I have enough premium .coms in the vault to generate income until I die without having to buy another domain in any extension ever. I own (1) .Domains domain simply because it's a hack on one of my domain name sales sites and 99.9% of the rest of my portfolio are .Com domains aged from 1998-2015
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back