what is your opinion in xyz extension?
It means that your pants are unzipped.Does it make sense to you?
It doesn't to me. What does xyz stand for? Is it suppose to be cute? Maybe I am missing something.
Not a fan.
-Omar
Well to look at an extension this way, what does .com, .net, .org, .io, .me,.. etc. stand for or mean?
Extensions only really mean something to domainers, who want to trade in them, and that boils down to only caring about the most popular and coveted ones, not to what they mean.
yes i agree with you omar it doesnt make sense but also jkhg.com and gfdr.com and most 4l.com dont make sense to me but they are selling as investment....i think .xyz became popular because google has taken a name on this extension..
we will see what will happen with this extension
No I don't, as I already noted - what does .com, .net, .org, .io, .me,.. etc. stand for or mean? And yeah, we know what they were 'supposed' to mean or stand for, but no one uses or buys them for their 'intended' meanings
And the first 2-3 years of the existance of .com, .net, .org you didn't see them advertised on billboards or commercials. Your point being??
But they (businesses) 'again' are not buying or using .com for what it means (commercial), but because it's (at this time) the more popular extension.
So my point still stands, that legacy extensions are not bought/used for what they 'mean', but because they are more 'known'.
Do you not read before you reply? I noted - but no one uses or buys them for their 'intended' meanings (except maybe by a 'very' few). And if you check site: .org, or site: .net, you'll be amazed (well..maybe not) how many are not being used by organizations or techies. So why then are they being used if not for their 'intended' meanings????No one buys them or uses them for their intended meaning?
Organizations and charities usually buy .orgs...or am I crazy? Tech niches love to get .nets.
Uhh... HUH?? And no, you don't.Well, I may be wrong on this but this wasn't the first push of GTLD's coming into the market. Haven't they been around for a few years now? If they have been around for years (more than 2-3) than I think I win this section of the debate.
Again, don't you read? I never said or implied this, so where you get or come up with this..is perplexing.I think you are trying to say .xyz or many of the other gtld extensions have the potential to overtake .com. If that's your view on it then that is totally cool but I can't agree with that.
They are not buying the domain for the 'intended' use/meaning of the extension, but for the keyword. I'm pretty sure Loans.org and Shoes.org, are not 'organizations' but are businesses!!A domainer WILL buy a .ORG if it makes sense for a organization or if it a MONSTER keyword term that is popular to the masses.
I never said or implied that, but again you keep distorting things.Ok. You're right. .xyz is king.
You win.
-Omar
never said or implied that, but again you keep distorting things.
whatever.
My point is .com came first, ruled the web.
here mine
daggers.xyz
betinlasvegas.xyz
betinvegas.xyz
bjcn88.xyz
bjcn888.xyz
calltome.xyz
changecash.xyz
daggers.xyz
deliverynow.xyz
dollarfast.xyz
earncash.xyz
eurofast.xyz
findalove.xyz
helpchildren.xyz
inyourhouse.xyz
poundfast.xyz
showmethemoney.xyz
traveltobrazil.xyz
traveltocaribe.xyz
traveltolasvegas.xyz
traveltolosangeles.xyz
traveltomiami.xyz
traveltonewyork.xyz
traveltousa.xyz
washcar.xyz
winlottery.xyz
wondertravel.xyz
yourwishlist.xyz
Hawkeye, you got a good point there; many years ago when the .com .net . org & .info was produced customers or users of TDN was not of thinking or don't care of what an extension word mean to their business. About 1984-1989 an enternet evolution; an extension words was born. But now, there are so many choices. So in today's business will meet the new era. And in my opinion, the newer TDN that make sense will make it to the top; and will eventually rise its value. Just my thoughts.No I don't, as I already noted - what does .com, .net, .org, .io, .me,.. etc. stand for or mean? And yeah, we know what they were 'supposed' to mean or stand for, but no one uses or buys them for their 'intended' meanings
And the first 2-3 years of the existance of .com, .net, .org you didn't see them advertised on billboards or commercials. Your point being??
But they (businesses) 'again' are not buying or using .com for what it means (commercial), but because it's (at this time) the more popular extension.
So my point still stands, that legacy extensions are not bought/used for what they 'mean', but because they are more 'known'.
What do you think about my xyz?
What do you think about my xyz?
Source ?Seriously, if it is good enough for Larry Page & Google to invest $250,000 USD in abc.xyz than it is good enough for ANY company.
Vote of confidence ? But they are buying plenty of domains in plenty of extensions. Should we buy in all the extensions they are using?That vote of confidence from the most important internet company was a "drop the mic" moment that solidified .xyz going forward.
Flawed argument. New gTLDs are not new technology, they work exactly like the 'old' extensions. Nothing more, nothing less.In my opinion, the gtld deniers are missing the big picture. I remember in the 90's when Hyundai made cars that were unreliable and very low quality. Today, their reputation is much different.
If you rely on estibot you have everything to learn. It's another flawed thinking: the .com sold for that much, then my .whatever should be worth --------. It just doesn't work like that.So many gtld deniers act as if the new extensions are a horrible investment. As part of my DD before buying my names, I looked at the estibot value of the corresponding .com. The total value for the .com's would have been about 60 million dollars. For a several thousand dollars, I was able to invest in keywords that have proven value.
You should do some research and see what BankLoans was bought for ?