.us .US - The OFFICIAL Discussion, Showcase and Sales Report Thread

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

slaughterbeck

Established Member
Impact
109
It appears the domain industry has been starting to take notice of the .us namespace over the past year, read DnJournal.com .us growth and Namepros with even greater expectations for the year to come.

So I thought it would be a good idea to ask everyone to show us your .us domain names. You can post your favorites or your entire portfolio.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
basslesson.us
 
0
•••
1
•••
Is a 4N us worth renewing for $7? Somehow I though they were NOT sold out, so if they are, I might hold another year

namebio shows only 2 sales both in 2013 : rolleyes :
 
0
•••
2
•••
Flipped one my 10 cent names for four figures. Or a 1,000,000% profit. Sorry can't reveal name.
 
3
•••
Flipped one my 10 cent names for four figures. Or a 1,000,000% profit. Sorry can't reveal name.
Of course not... lol j/k bro
Seriously, congratz Sam. Nice to hear about XXXX sales in .US.

Peace,
Cy
 
2
•••
PAY.us on Godaddy Auction, No reserve
Current bid at about $25K.
 
6
•••
2
•••
3
•••
keyboardlesson.us
mathblog.us
 
1
•••
wonder who has jes.us?

bajacalifornia.us
e-us.us
Leilani.us
Ellery.us
beverlyhillscalifornia.us
 
1
•••
AugmentedRealities.us

Taking Offers as well..
 
2
•••
2
•••
2
•••
pensionfund.us
 
0
•••
delete
 
0
•••

That URL only goes to About.us now. Here is a cached copy on Google however:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...ivacy-service-plan/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.

According to that, the commenting period may or should still open till tomorrow.

Although that URL is no longer resolving to the previous page, the link to the PDF about the issue is still live here:

https://ns-cdn.neustar.biz/creative...-services-plan-PUBLIC-COMMENT-2016-Dec-14.pdf

From the previously appearing page at the first URL:

"Please provide comments on or before January 16, 2017. Comments will be published and provided to the usTLD Stakeholder Council and Secretariat for consideration. Comments or questions may be submitted by emailing [email protected]."​
 
Last edited:
4
•••
. . . identified the lack of privacy services as a key issue suppressing domain name registration in the .US TLD . . .

Umm, no, other ccTLDs have no residency restrictions, IMO that is the bigger issue. : sigh :

PS but a step in the right direction nonetheless
 
0
•••
They did write "a key issue" and not "the key issue"...

The US has over 300 million people and growing. The UK only has just over 64 million, but the ccTLD there is huge, and also does not allow non-UK entities to register. So it's not about allowing non-US entities to register, although no doubt that would have resulted in much bigger registration numbers, perhaps even huge.

It's mainly about public awareness, marketing and other factors like a privacy option. If the American public were made to be fully aware of the availability of .US and allowed to have optional privacy, that is what could awaken the "sleeping giant" that has been sleeping since April 2002. To this day I can even speak to a current employee of the US federal government who did not even know that .US exists, which is exactly what I did just months ago with exactly such a friend of mine who has been working with the federal government for many years and is even very close to retiring already. Speak to others here and you can well expect to likely hear something like ".US? What's that?"

And notwithstanding the apparent contradiction of the way people behave with something like Facebook, for instance, which probably has more to do with simply not knowing how to use it for privacy, Americans seem to generally consider privacy important - at least as an available option.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Donations / us
 
Last edited:
3
•••
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back