- Impact
- 4,544
It is nice But..mobi is not exactly the best example of new gTLDs
It is nice But..mobi is not exactly the best example of new gTLDs
It is public knowledge some people have lost 6 figure on .mobi. It was hugely hyped among domainers.
5-figure amounts, possibly more were also wasted on TLDs such as .me .asia .tel .xxx and others.
We can only hope that people are burning cash that they can afford to lose and are not maxing out their credit cards.
There are many sad stories in domaining... but we only want to hear about the success stories. They are motivational and keep the dream alive, but hey are not representative. The truth is that the majority of domainers are losing money.
Generally speaking (I'm speaking only for myself though), the money invested in domain names is not productive most of the time and could have been diverted toward more useful purchases.
Actually .mobi had a much larger success then the new gtlds in the beginning.
There will just be a much larger downfall with the gtlds due to the ridiculous number of them released.
badum tss...Not even gonna throw my 2 cents in this ones too easy.
One has to buy domain names that are aesthetically acceptable. "Mobi" as a short form of mobile is never used in common language and was destined to fail from the beginning.
It is nice But..mobi is not exactly the best example of new gTLDs
5-figure amounts, possibly more were also wasted on TLDs such as .me .asia .tel .xxx and others.
Probably true. But there is a major difference here.Plenty more people have lost money on .coms
Bottom line: losing money is always easy. Making money is always hard.
I think there is potential in them and certainly wouldn't rubbish them as some have.
Probably true. But there is a major difference here.
They lost money because of their poor choice of domains. Not because of the extension.
At least in .com you have a chance because there is demand from end users.
In new extensions the problem is not just the left of the dot, the right too.
And on top of that the registry is often competing against domainers.
It's no wonder so few are reporting success with new TLDs. And you can get equally good return in 'legacy' TLDs, that are much less risky and easier to sell.
Bottom line: losing money is always easy. Making money is always hard. But if you choose the wrong path it's going to be even harder.
Part of the problem in discussing this is there are several types of success.
1) the registry is profitable or at least solvent
2) the enduser uses the domain successfully
3) domainers make money in the aftermarket
You could have each of these with or without the others, but if you don't have 1) then failure is inevitable no matter how good things look to endusers and domainers.
They lost money because of their poor choice of domains. Not because of the extension.
At least in .com you have a chance because there is demand from end users.
In new extensions the problem is not just the left of the dot, the right too.
And on top of that the registry is often competing against domainers.
The fact that so many non-news sites started adopting AMP even before it drove traffic came as a bit of a surprise to the team, but today, Google’s index includes AMP results from over 700,000 domains.