I disagree. Democrats have acted like or worse than Trump for years and the media covers for them.
I appreciate the civility of your response.
I am not now, nor have I ever defended the conduct of politicians who believe they are above the law. The media, as you know, has been extremely partisan in its coverage. For instance Fox News is again the voice for Trump - evidenced by their hiring and firing policies. Divisive politics is good for the news business, but at some point the well will run dry by repeating the same old tired talking points.
What I find more interesting is the true litmus test of American civil society: whether or not the criminal justice system is fair (though obviously not equal), and the rule of law holds criminals accountable. That is one of the pillars of democracy that I continue to have some faith in, though admittedly it appears that champions of justice are few and far between.
Does being rich, or being president, provide immunity to legal repercussion? It would seem so, but as Trump puts it the 'witchhunt' for criminal activity continues, despite every effort to resist disclosure of pertinent documents and potentially damning evidence that are now being examined by a grand jury.
Under close scrutiny is the act of bestowing political favouritism - buying people's influence - either in the form of undisclosed gifts or property, thereby using these material assets as leverage for control (not exactly bribes). If convicted on felony charges, Trump could still run for president, even though potentially be imprisoned. The outcome of the trial (should it come to that - and it is likely), will IMO decide the fate of future democracy in the United States, beyond the reach of media or partisan politics.