Here is a legal take on it:
"What Bush 41 is accused of doing to those women was
absolutely, unequivocally, sexual assault under most statutes. Such laws generally have two components: 1) touching in a sexual area; 2) absence of consent. Buttocks are
always considered a “sexual area,” and it sure seems like we’re missing any consent here."
And the quote he gave, that I just posted:
"If a spokesperson for one of my clients made such a statement, I’d have him fired immediately.
Not only does the statement admit to assaults on Lind and Grolnick, but it admits a regular pattern of similar harassment and assault. Plus, it actually says that it was
intentional. The idea that groping unsuspecting women is some sort of “good-natured” greeting is odious; the suggestion that the problem lies with “others” who choose to be offended by its inappropriateness is grotesque. Fail, on the coms front, Mr. McGrath."
https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/ge...his-publicists-response-is-beyond-disturbing/
Still waiting for Mr. X to figure out where he stands on it.
As an example, I wonder if he was grocery shopping with wife/gf/daughter/sister/mother and some man rolled up and patted/grabbed them on the ass. The victim turns to Mr. X and says they feel violated.
Mr. X would respond............how?
It's ok, he's old, let him pat/grab your ass? You feel violated, get over it? He's Republican, you know I put the Party above all, I'm a good comrade?
