The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

Oh piss off about Trump and his daughter. You're getting as creepy as he is.

That crap was all public info when he ran in the Primary. Didn't bother you or any other democrat until he won.

Can you give me a list of who ran and who won?

Trump is triggered today.

First Bob Corker - https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

Then Jeff Flake just went in on him - https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/24/read-sen-jeff-flakes-full-speech-from-the-senate-floor.html

Just to be clear, we have Mr. X saying it's just bad manners for a father to sexualize his daughters, to the point of talking about we don't know yet what kind of breasts our 1 year old baby daughter will have. And sexually assaulting women. Just bad manners, coarse etc. Will put that in the same bag as Gilsan who thinks it's the woman's fault for getting assaulted based on how she's dressed.

 

[JB Lions]

Oh piss off about Trump and his daughter. You're getting as creepy as he is.

That crap was all public info when he ran in the Primary. Didn't bother you or any other democrat until he won.

You didn't know some of it. What's truly creepy is you continuing to try to pass it off as boorish. You only use that term with him, and he's the worst of them. Clinton, Weinstein, have not heard 1 story of anything to do with their own daughters or underage type stuff.

 

[mr-x]

What? That's the dumbest thing I've read today. Obviously Trump, he's the dad. Which has what to do with all the sexualizing of his daughters? Explain that comment to me.

You bring her up every chance you get. If SHE doesn't have a problem with HER father... why do you?

Your fake outrage and virtual signaling is getting old. You demand someone says what you want or they're morally lacking. Pure liberal bullshit.

I voted for Donald Trump in-spite of his faults and would do the same if the circumstances repeated.

YOUR PARTY RIGGED AN ELECTION FOR A 70 YEAR OLD GANGSTER WHO HAD A STROKE.

 

[JB Lions]

You bring her up every chance you get. If SHE doesn't have a problem with HER father... why do you?

Your fake outrage and virtual signaling is getting old. You demand someone says what you want or they're morally lacking. Pure liberal bullsh*t.

I voted for Donald Trump in-spite of his faults and would do the same if the circumstances repeated.

YOUR PARTY RIGGED AN ELECTION FOR A 70 YEAR OLD GANGSTER WHO HAD A STROKE.

Actually, learn to read. You brought it up. I signed into to NP and first thing you post today is:

"To triggered or lazy to look up the word boorish?" Knowing I literally posted the definition earlier in the thread.

Then started talking about Weinstein.........yet again.

It's on your mind, I just responded to it.

We could talk about politics but you and Gilsan rather talk about Weinstein. Again, I bring this up because the only fake outrage would be on your guys part when you put a pervert in the White House, then act like you care when other perverted type stuff happens. It's fake.

And nobody rigged an election.

Are you going to talk about Weinstein some more, so you don't have to touch 2 Republican senators going off on Trump?

 

[mr-x]

Risky move bro, just like Normandy

 

[JB Lions]

Bob Corker Completely SLAMS Trump, "Trump Has A Great DIFFICULTY With The Truth"

 

[GILSAN]

Your post in the thread The NP's Official USA Political Thread was deleted. Reason: Off-Topic / Post has been removed / Thank you for understanding
Today at 3:48 PM

This is the 2nd time in a few days this has happened. It would be nice if I'd be told by the Moderator what post was deleted, what topic, and in what page, because, since I post a lot, I can't remember all my posts going back more than a week or more.

 

[mr-x]

Actually, learn to read. You brought it up. I signed into to NP and first thing you post today is:

"To triggered or lazy to look up the word boorish?" Knowing I literally posted the definition earlier in the thread.

Again... responding to you.

When you have proof Trump has done something illegal, let us know. The resistance will build you a monument in the Smithsonian.

Then started talking about Weinstein.........yet again.

It's on your mind, I just responded to it.

You misspelled whined.

And nobody rigged an election.

Someone tell Bernie.

Are you going to talk about Weinstein some more, so you don't have to touch 2 Republican senators going off on Trump?

Ehh.. they're leaving b/c they can't get reelected. Corker is pissed b/c President Trump wouldn't give him a job in the State Dept.. Something about sending cash to Iran.

Flake seems like a nice guy. I'm sure Hollywood and NY will be calling him a hero. To be honest, I thought we'd be talking about President Pence by now.

President Trump doing an OK job.

 

[JB Lions]

Doing ok job, even tho most Americans and most of the world would disagree.

Yes, Corker and Iran, and Trump continually lying about him with that. But that's the new normal with Trump fans.

Bernie wasn't a Democrat, he was an Independent. Obviously the DNC would want the Democrat. Bernie should have started his own thing.

 

[mr-x]

WaPo say's Grandma Barker paid the Russians for the Russia dossier.

I thought everyone knew that.

 

[JB Lions]

WaPo say's Grandma Barker paid the Russians for the Russia dossier.

Show attachment 71598

I thought everyone knew that.

Shocking news, that politicians do opposition research, especially with a guy that is still hiding his taxes. Next somebody will tell me water is wet. This one was actually started by the Republicans, then it was taken over.

 

[mr-x]

Yes, Corker and Iran, and Trump continually lying about him with that. But that's the new normal with Trump fans.

So you're saying Corker didn't support the Iran Deal? Cause...

TL;DR
Bob Corker got the rules changed so the Iran bill could pass without a super majority.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/30/bob-corkers-blunder-helping-obama-get-iran-deal/
Enter Mr. Corker. He sponsored a measure that required the president to submit the agreement to the Senate but turned the Constitution upside down.

Under Article 2, Section 2 the president must get a two-thirds vote in favor of any treaty to make it a part of the law of the land. Instead, Mr. Corker’s provision required opponents of the deal to muster a two-thirds vote — 66 senators — to vote against it. It was a pretense to conceal another Republican cave-in to Mr. Obama.

Bernie wasn't a Democrat, he was an Independent. Obviously the DNC would want the Democrat. Bernie should have started his own thing.

Ohh.. So it depends on what is, is again. Got it.

 

[mr-x]

Shocking news, that politicians do opposition research, especially with a guy that is still hiding his taxes. Next somebody will tell me water is wet. This one was actually started by the Republicans, then it was taken over.

Old and busted: Collusion!

New hotness: Research!

 

[JB Lions]

So you're saying Corker didn't support the Iran Deal? Cause....

No, he voted against it. Even wrote an op-ed against it - Congress Should Reject The Bad Iran Deal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...73967a143d3_story.html?utm_term=.cdc2664a185d

"The following month, Corker did just that, joining with the bipartisan group to vote against the deal."

"Corker, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was in fact a vehement critic of the deal that emerged from international negotiations in the summer of 2015. After the deal was unveiled, he wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post that "Congress should reject this deal and send it back to the President."
Corker plotted efforts to block the deal, banding with Republicans -- and even some Democrats -- in an attempt to block the deal."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/donald-trump-bob-corker-iran-deal-fact-check/index.html

Seriously, start reading better sources.

Ohh.. So it depends on what is, is again. Got it.

I stated facts, he's an Independent, he himself says he's not a Democrat. Why the struggle to understand this simple fact?

Bonus source about Corker - http://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/trump-misleads-corker/

Trump lies in his tweets, if you haven't figured that out yet.

 

[mr-x]

No, he voted against it. Even wrote an op-ed against it - Congress Should Reject The Bad Iran Deal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...73967a143d3_story.html?utm_term=.cdc2664a185d

"Corker, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was in fact a vehement critic of the deal that emerged from international negotiations in the summer of 2015. After the deal was unveiled, he wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post that "Congress should reject this deal and send it back to the President."
Corker plotted efforts to block the deal, banding with Republicans -- and even some Democrats -- in an attempt to block the deal."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/donald-trump-bob-corker-iran-deal-fact-check/index.html

Seriously, start reading better sources.

Facts are facts. If he hadn't supported changing the rules, it would not have passed. HE introduced the bill to change them specifically for the Iran bill.

Doesn't matter if it was a mistake or intentional now.

I stated facts, he's an Independent, he himself says he's not a Democrat. Why the struggle to understand this simple fact?

Perfectly progressive explanation.

https://www.redstate.com/bradslager/2017/08/30/federal-court-determines-wasserman-rigged-election-for-hillary-and-says-“so-what”/

 

[JB Lions]

Facts are facts./

He voted against the bill. He wrote an op-ed against it. That's not support. There is nothing to debate here.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

 

[Kate]

Endangered species spotted: a Republican with guts and principles.
Senator Jeff Flake won't seek re-election in 2018 (quoting faux news)http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...flake-says-wont-seek-re-election-in-2018.html
Made some scathing comments on 45.

 

[mr-x]

Endangered species spotted: a Republican with guts and principles.
Senator Jeff Flake won't seek re-election in 2018 (quoting faux news)
Made some scathing comments on 45.

Flake is at 18points favorable. He couldn't run for reelection with any chance of winning. He campaigned as a conservative then voted as a moderate.

 

[mr-x]

He voted against the bill. He wrote an op-ed against it. That's not support. There is nothing to debate here.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

Actions speak louder then words.

Corker wrote the bill for President Obama to suspend the law requiring a two thirds majority, so the senate could pass the IRAN TREATY despite republican opposition.

The people from his district agree so he's going back home.

*2016, media outlets were saying Flaked help Obama pass the Iran treaty. 2017, they're making to make it about Trump. No one except liberals care.

 

[mr-x]

Grandma Barker cracks me up!