NameSilo
NamecheapNamecheap
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    305 
    votes
    45.6%
  • Neither Party

    58 
    votes
    8.7%
  • Democrats

    150 
    votes
    22.4%
  • Republicans

    156 
    votes
    23.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
17
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
2
•••
Actually, most of America doesn't like that Canadian. Last time I looked, he had a 26% favorability rating. The only reason why we haven't deported him yet, is we're going to use him for a few more years. Let him think he's getting at Obama, when he's helping the Democrats out, wrecking the Republican party. Just 3 more years to the next election and the Tea Party folk will get into a frenzy the closer we get, and then their crazy gets exposed even more. Again, helping the Democrats out.

An opinion piece? Just a Tea Partier that wrote an article.

"we want to defeat the liberals and the statists and not "work with them."

That says it all. That is their goal. Just a bunch of butt hurt Republicans whose goal was to get at Obama/Democrats. Not help make this country get better, "not work with them". Well, working together is how you get things done.

I mean look at this:

"We don't care about the national Republican Party anymore, so don't even bother asking us to donate money."

But Ted Cruz and company all run as Republicans.

It's a lost party, it's like watching a train wreck and some people on the train don't even know it's happening.

---------- Post added at 05:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:34 PM ----------

Wanted to add, put this in the other thread as well:

Clear majority favors legal marijuana, new Gallup poll shows

"Sixty-two percent of independents favored legalization in 2013, up 12 percentage points from last year, according to the poll. Sixty-five percent of Democrats favored legalization, vs. just 35 percent of Republicans."

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...ws?liteutm_content=morelink&utm_term=Politics

What does the Republican Party do about that? The independents (the votes you need) is just about as high as the Democrats. And the other social issues like gay marriage? It's all clearly going in one direction. Either way you move, it's going to be a loss. Stay where you are, lose the independents on social issues. Move to the middle/left, lose your base. Lose/Lose. Social issues, this country's Demographics, Hillary winning in 2016, where is the next win, if ever again?
 
Last edited:
2
•••
wrong thread sorry


Ill fix it by saying Sara P is hot!

---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:44 PM ----------

Poll: Majority favors legalizing pot

Americans now favor legalize everything, as long as it doesn't directly hurt a child

The indirectly stuff don't matter anymore.


There I think I fixed my miss post
 
3
•••
Well, working together is how you get things done.

Impossible to work with Obama. His version of working together is everybody else doing what he wants. When congress doesn't pass cap and trade, he uses the EPA to squash the coal and oil industry. When congress does not pass immigration as soon as he wants or in the form that he wants, he tells the justice department to ignore the rule of law. When congress has legitimate questions about Benghazi, Obamacare, Fast and Furious, His visitation logs, or anything else he doesn't want to talk about, he obfuscates. He is a paid employee, but he acts like a dictator. -shrugs- That's the environment he wants, that's what he gets.

I just thought the piece corrected a few lies that the left like to spread.

Oh, and I am sure a majority does not like Texan Ted Cruz, I mean we start with 47% that can't wean themselves off the government teat right from the getgo ( and yeah, I know a minority of that 47% is actually legit, don't even go there - you know exactly what I mean ) .
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Obama the dictator also loves spying on his allies; Germany, Mexico, Brazil and now France. With friends like Barack, who needs enemies? Could Canada be the next to find out it's been spied on as well?

Just imagine if it was a Republican President doing the same... the Liberal media would be criticizing it, non stop 48 hours a day for months on end.
 
2
•••
Obama the dictator also loves spying on his allies; Germany, Mexico, Brazil and now France. With friends like Barack, who needs enemies? Could Canada be the next to find out it's been spied on as well?

Just imagine if it was a Republican President doing the same... the Liberal media would be criticizing it, non stop 48 hours a day for months on end.

Might be the most ridiculous post today. As if spying is anything new. As if other countries don't spy on us. Of course we spy on Canada. Of course the same thing has happened under Republican presidents.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
really all this is business as usual and par for the course no matter if a republican or democrat is president
 
4
•••
I'm not as bent out of shape over spying on other countries as I am the idea that they are collecting a profile on American citizens.


Ran across this elsewhere, thought it was kinda funny. My apologies in advance for the length:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bob: "Hey Jim, did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?,

Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama saying the avg family would save $2,500 on their premiums?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Forcing businesses to violate their religious beliefs by paying for drugs that abort the unborn?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Violating the rights and sanctity of our Churches?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Spending $634 million on a website that doesn't work?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama calling for an increase in our debt when he lambasted Bush for the very same thing?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama having NSA spy on 124 Billion Phone Calls in One Month?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Saddling our kids with an additional $8 trillion in debt of which they can never get out of and will not have as good a life as we have?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Bailing out Detroit after decades of corrupt Democratic management?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean voter fraud?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Intentionally trying to hurt Americans during the sequester?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Blocking veterans who secured our freedoms from their monuments but giving the green light for Illegals to use Monument Mall?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Denying school kids the ability to tour the White House but still spending lavishly on his parties?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean Obama saying we can keep our insurance and doctors if we wanted to?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The NSA monitoring foreign diplomats?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the use of drones in our own country without the benefit of the law?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?"

Bob: "No the other one:.

Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean Obama spending $3.7 Trillion on Welfare Over Last 5 Years"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 months later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything else?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Millions of Americans losing their health care coverage?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Forcing Americans to include coverage in their insurance policies of items they do not want?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons, and falsely blaming the sequester?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Denying Arizona the right to protect its borders?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Providing weapons to Syrian rebels many of whom apparently are Al Queda"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a

budget no later than the first Monday in February?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The President using nearly $1 trillion dollars of stimulus money to fund his cronies?"

Bob: "No, the other one"

Jim: "You mean Fast & Furious?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim:

"I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million

low-information voters who don't pay taxes and get free stuff from

taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt

administration in American history?"

Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE!"
 
2
•••
I'm not as bent out of shape over spying on other countries as I am the idea that they are collecting a profile on American citizens.


Ran across this elsewhere, thought it was kinda funny. My apologies in advance for the length:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bob: "Hey Jim, did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?,

Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama saying the avg family would save $2,500 on their premiums?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Forcing businesses to violate their religious beliefs by paying for drugs that abort the unborn?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Violating the rights and sanctity of our Churches?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Spending $634 million on a website that doesn't work?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama calling for an increase in our debt when he lambasted Bush for the very same thing?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Obama having NSA spy on 124 Billion Phone Calls in One Month?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Saddling our kids with an additional $8 trillion in debt of which they can never get out of and will not have as good a life as we have?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Bailing out Detroit after decades of corrupt Democratic management?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean voter fraud?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Intentionally trying to hurt Americans during the sequester?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Blocking veterans who secured our freedoms from their monuments but giving the green light for Illegals to use Monument Mall?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Denying school kids the ability to tour the White House but still spending lavishly on his parties?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean Obama saying we can keep our insurance and doctors if we wanted to?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The NSA monitoring foreign diplomats?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the use of drones in our own country without the benefit of the law?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?"

Bob: "No the other one:.

Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "You mean Obama spending $3.7 Trillion on Welfare Over Last 5 Years"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 months later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything else?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Millions of Americans losing their health care coverage?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Forcing Americans to include coverage in their insurance policies of items they do not want?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons, and falsely blaming the sequester?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Denying Arizona the right to protect its borders?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Providing weapons to Syrian rebels many of whom apparently are Al Queda"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a

budget no later than the first Monday in February?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim: "The President using nearly $1 trillion dollars of stimulus money to fund his cronies?"

Bob: "No, the other one"

Jim: "You mean Fast & Furious?"

Bob: "No, the other one."

Jim:

"I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million

low-information voters who don't pay taxes and get free stuff from

taxpayers and stuck us again with the most pandering, corrupt

administration in American history?"

Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE!"

Some of that is repeated more than once in your post to make it look longer (ex. NSA 3 times) or already taken apart in this thread or not a real scandal or the same stuff that would happen under any President or just a distraction from the fact the economy is getting better. You know the issue the Republicans used to be about when it was bad. You can make lists like that for any President.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Yeah, I know, just thought it was kind of funny. You didn't need to requote it, though, lol.
 
1
•••
Russel Brand... Weather you love or hate his ideology, his ability to talk is really quite impressive, or should I say; where the exuberance of his verbosity is absolutely intoxicating

Watch Russel being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman, where RB says that "a Socialist Revolution is Coming"

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGxFJ5nL9gg"]Russell Brand vs. Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight 2013 [Full Interview] - YouTube[/ame]
 
4
•••
Gilsan- Trying to listen to that guy reminded me of this Monty Python and the Holy Grail moment:

[ame]http://youtu.be/fxGqcCeV3qk[/ame]
 
3
•••
Russel Brand.

He cant be too smart, he filed for divorce on Katy Perry

tsz.gif
 
2
•••
Russel Brand... Weather you love or hate his ideology, his ability to talk is really quite impressive, or should I say; where the exuberance of his verbosity is absolutely intoxicating

Watch Russel being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman, where RB says that "a Socialist Revolution is Coming"

Brand is my hero.
 
2
•••
MSNBC's Martin Bashir apologized to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for his comments on Friday in which he suggested that someone should โ€œp*ssโ€ and โ€œs***โ€ in Palinโ€™s mouth.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/11/18/Bashir-Apologizes

Another example of a Liberal "Obama Kiss-Ass" journalist who has absolutely no respect for anyone who does not fall into his line of thinking. The idiot should have been fired on the spot and sent back to the UK, but just like Piers Morgan I suspect the English don't want him back

I hope Palin does NOT accept his apology and instead, she should send him a p*ss and sh** sandwich. Make it 2 sandwiches... the other should go to Chris Mathews
 
1
•••
MSNBC's Martin Bashir apologized to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for his comments on Friday in which he suggested that someone should โ€œp*ssโ€ and โ€œs***โ€ in Palinโ€™s mouth.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/11/18/Bashir-Apologizes

Another example of a Liberal "Obama Kiss-Ass" journalist who has absolutely no respect for anyone who does not fall into his line of thinking. The idiot should have been fired on the spot and sent back to the UK, but just like Piers Morgan I suspect the English don't want him back

I hope Palin does NOT accept his apology and instead, she should send him a p*ss and sh** sandwich. Make it 2 sandwiches... the other should go to Chris Mathews
And that's why the whole circle jerk continues.
 
1
•••
2
•••
1
•••
Letยดs balance out that report from nbc
In order to avoid any accusations of conspiracy theories I will only use quotes:
"THE BLS KEEPS SIX DIFFERENT measures of unemployment, of which the official unemployment rate, U-3, is only one. While the official measure covers just those who have looked for work over the previous four weeks, U-6 builds on that category and adds two others: the "marginally attached," jobless folks who have not looked over the previous four weeks, but have looked at some point over the past year; and the "involuntary part-time," part-timers who are seeking full-time work. In November, with U-3 at 7%, U-6 ran 13.2%. "

"Put another way, at a U-6 of 13.2%, U-3 should be 7.5% because 1.76 times 7.5 equals 13.2. That's why, as a measure of unemployment broadly defined, the official unemployment rate is currently misleading. "
source: http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424053111903302604579234220737205480.html

images used on zero hedge and bullfax
925d6633cc0f7b16b87781f2b712d398d33b5a9b.jpg

585b59a33158c24e1e00a94bcfcfbe85f1c904e2.jpg


"In short: applying a realistic labor force participation rate to the unemployment rate series, shows that the real US unemployment rate is now 11.5%, a 4.5% difference from the reported number, and the second highest ever, only better compared to October's 4.7%. "
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-12-06/real-us-unemployment-rate-115


BTW
all the people that think Russel Brand is cool. You do realise that he does not vote and pomotes the idea of not voting right?
 
2
•••
We already took apart that nonsense earlier in the thread. The number I posted is the number used when talking about this. The number Romney used in his commercials and his closing speech talking about how it was still over 8%, then it went under 8 right before the election. The reality is it's going back down from a high of 10%. 7 < 10.
 
1
•••
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back