The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[GILSAN]

Probably won't be mentioned, since it has nothing to do with Domestic Policy. But it were, is religion off topic or something just for Republican candidates? As if, we didn't here a bunch of Christian/Muslim stuff with Obama, like from Gilsan in this thread, during the last campaign, throughout his presidency.

They're both going to get tough questions as usual, just one side seems to cry about it more.

The only tough questions Obummer will get already happened last week at Univision. These Liberal Moderators should be sent to Mexico for several years to learn how to ask tough unbiased questions.

 

[JB Lions]

The only tough questions Obummer will get already happened last week at Univision. These Liberal Moderators should be sent to Mexico for several years to learn how to ask tough unbiased questions.

Feel free to go thru the moderators and show me something. Something a little more than your incessant whining about the media. And the audience during the town hall debate, I guess Obama rounded up some liberals/socialists and will plant them in the audience.

You have moderators like Lehrer whose done 11 of these. Doesn't seem like either candidate has a problem with them.

I think your real problem is, you know Mitt will wilt to tough questions, so you need somebody to blame. I can tell you one that will go in his direction. To try to show he has a heart recently, he talked about what he did with healthcare in his state, you know the same thing Obama is trying to do with the country. He'll be asked about it, it won't look good, I expect you here on that day doing your blah blah blah liberal media routine.

Republican gets asked a tough question or even just a basic one, liberal media out to get them. I think old Republicans would be ashamed of some of this whining today, don't remember them being that soft in the past.

 

[verbster]

The only tough questions Obummer will get already happened last week at Univision. These Liberal Moderators should be sent to Mexico for several years to learn how to ask tough unbiased questions.

Nope. No truth there. Strike one. Batter up.

 

[GILSAN]

Truth? If you don't know what truth is (not the truth, just truth) how can you know if it hurts or not? Show me you know what truth is. Write one single unassailable truth that supports one single political view you hold.

Read the whole bloody thread if you want examples. Liberals only understand one truth; their own. That's the result of all the brainwashing they receive every day from their biased media, and you are a good example of one.

 

[JB Lions]

Read the whole bloody thread if you want examples. Liberals only understand one truth; their own. That's the result of all the brainwashing they receive every day from their biased media, and you are a good example of one.

From someone who gets brainwashed from YouTube videos, haha. You just posted one of them, I just took it apart. It's pathetic. It's like you don't know how to Google or something and find the truth. You're the perfect target for this kind of stuff, just lazy.

 

[GILSAN]

Nope. No truth there. Strike one. Batter up.

You seem to think that only you know what the truth is. I suggest you leave Alaska for a while and let your brain cells defrost a little

 

[verbster]

Read the whole bloody thread if you want examples. Liberals only understand one truth; their own. That's the result of all the brainwashing they receive every day from their biased media, and you are a good example of one.

Nope. Strike two. C'mon, batter, stop acting like a batboy. . . step up to the plate and slap the motherf*cker out of the park and trot the bases.

 

[GILSAN]

From someone who gets brainwashed from YouTube videos, haha. You just posted one of them, I just took it apart. It's pathetic. It's like you don't know how to Google or something and find the truth. You're the perfect target for this kind of stuff, just lazy.

You're calling me lazy? Of what? Not finding the truth? You mean the BS the Liberals have been brainwashed into believing is the truth?

Listen, you and I account for about 70-80% of the posts in this thread, and thats not counting the Ron Paul thread. You call that lazy? Yea I suppose so, after all you're a Liberal; you're the owners of the truth, right?

 

[JB Lions]

You're calling me lazy? Of what? Not finding the truth? You mean the BS the Liberals have been brainwashed into believing is the truth?

Listen, you and I account for about 70-80% of the posts in this thread, and thats not counting the Ron Paul thread. You call that lazy? Yea I suppose so, after all you're a Liberal; you're the owners of the truth, right?

90% of your posts are the same thing. I think you have some sort of post template about liberal media and change a few words here and there. Yes, you are lazy. You watch a YouTube video, post it here. Don't even take the time to find out for yourself if it's true or not - see the phone video above. You've done that many times.

Look at post 456 - http://www.namepros.com/4387205-post456.html

same stuff. You'll probably talk about it some more within your next few posts. You talk more about the media than an actual political topic.

 

[GILSAN]

Nope. Strike two. C'mon, batter, stop acting like a batboy. . . step up to the plate and slap the motherf*cker out of the park and trot the bases.

I don't care much for Baseball, so all that Baseball jargon you're blabbering about is like writing in Chinese. If you want to talk a REAL SPORT then lets talk Soccer.

 

[verbster]

You're calling me lazy? Of what? Not finding the truth? You mean the BS the Liberals have been brainwashed into believing is the truth?

Listen, you and I account for about 70-80% of the posts in this thread, and thats not counting the Ron Paul thread. You call that lazy? Yea I suppose so, after all you're a Liberal; you're the owners of the truth, right?

STEEErike Three. Takes the first K without the stick even leaving the shoulder. The crowd was expecting more. I'll settle for a grounder with eyes. At least take a swing. Kick the dirt off your cleats. Spread the lines and dig in. It's one down, two to go.
Batter up! Slap the crap out of it.

 

[GILSAN]

90% of your posts are the same thing. I think you have some sort of post template about liberal media and change a few words here and there. Yes, you are lazy. You watch a YouTube video, post it here. Don't even take the time to find out for yourself if it's true or not - see the phone video above. You've done that many times.

Look at post 456 - http://www.namepros.com/4387205-post456.html

same stuff. You'll probably talk about it some more within your next few posts. You talk more about the media than an actual political topic.

The Videos I put up don't need much explanation. They are easy to comprehend, except for Liberals of course, who don't appreciate the truth.
I'll stop talking about the Media when Obama gets his ass whipped next month!

---------- Post added at 06:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:51 PM ----------

STEEErike Three. Takes the first K without the stick even leaving the shoulder. The crowd was expecting more. I'll settle for a grounder with eyes. At least take a swing. Kick the dirt off your cleats. Spread the lines and dig in. It's one down, two to go.
Batter up! Slap the crap out of it.

Are you still talking to the wall? :zzz: Tell me when the game is over :zzz:

 

[verbster]

Are you still talking to the wall? :zzz: Tell me when the game is over :zzz:

Yeah, thanks for showing what you know about truth. You know in the debates when a candidate spews all kinds of evasive drivel when he's asked a question he can't answer? Well, how does that drivel taste?

 

[Theo Goodman]

the phone video could be:
1. an organization really did give people a phone
2. she means that now she can afford a phone
3. they (the organization) offered her a deal on a phone
4. totaly out of context as we dont know the discussion 30 seconds before and after.
-
Keep in mind this does not show some kind of nationwide free phone give away.
-
Really what is the big deal with people that get paid 11 bucks an hour to take part in a protest? What is wrong with using a bus to transport people to an event to protest it?
Every lobby group does this in different forms.
They have people that are paid in their organization. They are paid to lobby, could be holding a sign or meeting with people or recuiting members door to door. As in the video this is not a secret or uncommon. Should we investigate every anti abortion group a tie them to funding activists that kill or threaten to kill doctors ( ironic and very prolife )? Or the recent tea party group that sent in hunderds of thousands of voter fruad claims of which zero where found out to be relavant by the NC goverment. This group was claiming to be non-profit publicly. You can do research and see where non-profits get money with state records. But since they are not registered as a non-profit but as a business the source of their funding is not public- Looks like paid or funded lobby group. So many examples on both sides.
As for people being paid to go door to door to get new members ,sounds like the mormans to me.

Maybe this guy was in some US trained death squads?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgec9WX21ik&feature=related"]Exploding Tea Party Protester Threatens Interviewer (Original) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[RogueWriter]

Hey Gilsan, since you don't seem to know a whole lot about baseball, here is a short instructional video that might help clarify the game for you:

[ame="http://youtu.be/AP4keCkYHYU"]http://youtu.be/AP4keCkYHYU[/ame]


Now, Bill Clinton, to his credit, did a fine job, but perhaps that's because he got a little experience in before stepping onto the mound:

[ame="http://youtu.be/O_PytAcOWug"]http://youtu.be/O_PytAcOWug[/ame]

---------- Post added at 04:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:12 AM ----------

Don't intend to inundate the thread with vids, but here was an old one I wanted to share, Ronald Reagan getting in a zinger at the end of the video. I think it is especially valid today, though:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK3Eo9cScEQ&feature=share&list=PL01190315DCD89259"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK3Eo9cScEQ&feature=share&list=PL01190315DCD89259[/ame]

 

[GILSAN]

Hey Gilsan, since you don't seem to know a whole lot about baseball, here is a short instructional video that might help clarify the game for you:

Now, Bill Clinton, to his credit, did a fine job, but perhaps that's because he got a little experience in before stepping onto the mound:

[/COLOR]Don't intend to inundate the thread with vids, but here was an old one I wanted to share, Ronald Reagan getting in a zinger at the end of the video. I think it is especially valid today, though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK3Eo9cScEQ&feature=share&list=PL01190315DCD89259

OK, after watching the Videos, I now know that Bush and Clinton can throw a ball better than Obama.

However, Barack does look more like a Baseball player but his throw was too short, just like the way he governs the country.

As for Reagan, there's only one thing to say; Brilliant. :kickass:

Is that Reagan "Zinger" what they call a curved ball?

 

[RogueWriter]

Now, maybe a better analogy for the fanatic left would be to use another sport. Bush may be retired, and Romney's golfing ability may be untested, but Obama has had more time to work on his golf game, so that would be a safe framework to go with. Oh, sore subject, that. Bet he doesn't play another round until after the election. So, no golfing analogies. Hmmm, let's see.

Soccer? Obama is probably pretty good at that, but that might remind people that he grew up on another continent, because frankly soccer just isn't quite in that top tier of popular sports in the U.S. . Don't get me wrong; played it in high school, loved the game, but we are trying to come up with a positive analogy that most in the U.S. would appreciate. So, no soccer analogies.

Football? Maybe. Obama might even be able to take Romney in a game of football, if they used pads. There are many aspects of football that could be used in trying to make a point, pass interference, illegal shifts, fumbles, 4th and goal, a plethora of ways in which you could make digs on Obama's behalf. So maybe an occasional nod to the football analogy would work.

Basketball, certainly, Obama prides himself on his game, so how 'bout a reference to half time, overtime, help defense, full court press, a three pointer, nothing but net, THAT is a sport folks could associate with an Obama Presidential run.

But a baseball analogy? Obama just can't get it over the plate, perfect summary of his Presidency. Fail.

 

[GILSAN]

Now, maybe a better analogy for the fanatic left would be to use another sport. Bush may be retired, and Romney's golfing ability may be untested, but Obama has had more time to work on his golf game, so that would be a safe framework to go with. Oh, sore subject, that. Bet he doesn't play another round until after the election. So, no golfing analogies. Hmmm, let's see.

Soccer? Obama is probably pretty good at that, but that might remind people that he grew up on another continent, because frankly soccer just isn't quite in that top tier of popular sports in the U.S. . Don't get me wrong; played it in high school, loved the game, but we are trying to come up with a positive analogy that most in the U.S. would appreciate. So, no soccer analogies.

Football? Maybe. Obama might even be able to take Romney in a game of football, if they used pads. There are many aspects of football that could be used in trying to make a point, pass interference, illegal shifts, fumbles, 4th and goal, a plethora of ways in which you could make digs on Obama's behalf. So maybe an occasional nod to the football analogy would work.

Basketball, certainly, Obama prides himself on his game, so how 'bout a reference to half time, overtime, help defense, full court press, a three pointer, nothing but net, THAT is a sport folks could associate with an Obama Presidential run.

But a baseball analogy? Obama just can't get it over the plate, perfect summary of his Presidency. Fail.

GOLF? Since Obama has spent more time on the golf courses than on fixing the economy, I might be led to believe that he'd probably beat Bush. As for Clinton I remember him enjoyed his jogging, but at least he did that while working on the economy

SOCCER? Only if Obama sent Sasha and Malia to play against his opponent would he have a chance of winning.

Basketball? (Soccer and Basketball = My favorites) Now there's a game Obama would whip their asses. If only he could govern the way he plays the hoops, then I wouldn't be here bashing him. :D

 

[Theo Goodman]

I think they should require some activity like 1 on 1 basketball for 3-5min or a home run durby with a pitching machine to go along with the debates. Although "winning" would not really matter how they carry themselves could show character, or lack thereof.

 

[JB Lions]

Ole Mitt is already wilting before the debates even start - http://news.yahoo.com/romney-camp-d...RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3

We might see a nervous breakdown live on stage

Ryan is probably trying to find a way to call in sick for his debate with Biden