IT.COM
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    134 
    votes
    22.3%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,558
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
And you believe you have a chance of impeachment with that guy?

Show attachment 134408
Fyi, it hasn't been Officially confirmed that he is the guy.

And at this point in the process we have moved way ahead of even needing this guy any longer.
You guys are just behind the times at this point.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
Yes, because it's already been corroborated and it just doesn't matter who the whistle blower is. I'm not sure if you've been watching the news?

And:
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=whistle+blower+laws
Fyi, it hasn't been Officially confirmed that he is the guy.

And at this point in the process we have moved way ahead of even needing this guy any longer.
You guys are just behind the times at this point.

Even here you dummycrats can't get your story straight lol
Screenshot_20191106-172107_Chrome.jpg


"It's already been corroborated" vs "it hasn't been confirmed" lmao
 
0
•••
Even here you dummycrats can't get your story straight lol
Show attachment 134409

"It's already been corroborated" vs "it hasn't been confirmed" lmao

I'm talking about the evidence, not the person. Doesn't matter who the whistle blower is. Wasted your time on a screenshot.

Well, that rules out 33 year olds such as Lady Gaga, the Olsen twins, Drake, Megan Fox, and Shia LaBeouf.

JK.

Carry on...

It can't he Shia, he works at Epik - https://www.namepros.com/members/gube.1015966/
 
Last edited:
0
•••
1
•••
Even here you dummycrats can't get your story straight lol
Show attachment 134409

"It's already been corroborated" vs "it hasn't been confirmed" lmao
Did I or didn't I give you the correct initials?

Trump Jr says its the guy but lets see who is the first to go on Official record declaring its him.
 
0
•••
Did I or didn't I give you the correct initials?

Trump Jr says its the guy but lets see who is the first to go on Official record declaring its him.

You did indeed give the correct initials.
Hence the link and photo.
 
0
•••
You did indeed give the correct initials.
Hence the link and photo.
Well then so much for your theory that I am full of BS :-P
 
0
•••
Well then so much for your theory that I am full of BS :-P

Because when we subpoena the bidens it's going to be Christmas for the Republicans and the dummycrats are going to tuck tail and run.

giphy.gif
 
2
•••
0
•••
2
•••
0
•••
Dude, take a breather and read the following slowly.

Dummycrats want to impeach a sitting U.S. president for ilegitly doing what his opponent did himself and admitted to on live TV and 3x as much.

Lmfao!
Think about that for a sec, or in your case 2,3
 
0
•••
Dude, take a breather and read the following slowly.

Dummycrats want to impeach a sitting U.S. president for ilegitly doing what his opponent did himself and admitted to on live TV and 3x as much.

Lmfao!
Think about that for a sec, or in your case 2,3
Oh brother, Get real.
 
0
•••
So “Russia Rand” Paul is threatening to out the whistleblower?

Hmmm, slandering a patriotic elected American. Rand Paul would make a great president.

Meanwhile, the saboteur/"whistlebower", like Enlytend, also speaks Russian. And that woman who testified the other day against Trump - another Russian.

Interesting all the people working so hard to subvert a democratically elected leader are so well versed in Russian. Maybe all this Russian conspiracy nonsense is a clever diversion. I have to hand it to you - pretty good....
 
2
•••
0
•••
0
•••
If you think the Republicans are going to impeach the President, you probably watch MSNBC
 
1
•••
1
•••
If you think the Republicans are going to impeach the President, you probably watch MSNBC
????
We don't need no stinking Republicans to Impeach.

Just a simple majority in the House, we got that.

We need Republicans to Convict and Remove the President. And that is a different story.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
????
We don't need no stinking Republicans to Impeach.

Just a simple majority in the House, we got that.

We need Republicans to Convict and Remove the President. And that is a different story.

Whistleblowers lawyer in 2017.

Screenshot from 2019-11-06 17-07-18.png



I'll vote for Trump again no-problem.
 
2
•••
Whistleblowers lawyer in 2017.

Show attachment 134441


I'll vote for Trump again no-problem.
That has nothing to do with needing Republicans to impeach.
So you realize you were Wrong :-P

Your Orange leader will be Impeached.
 
0
•••
2
•••
2
•••
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back