This should be controversial.
If you really want to understand the value of .tel, please read this whole post. If you want to constructively challenge the information here, please go right ahead, but let’s stop talking about .tel as a TLD that we can build minimalist web pages on. That's not going to get us where we want to go.
Acroplex, thanks for the comments. I could see your point here if .tel was supposed to function "like any other TLD," but it's a TLD in name only. It's really a way of standardizing contact data in a way that it can be utilized by a multitude of communication devices (mobile phones, computers, etc.). .tel is not about what you the user sees when s/he pulls up Example.tel in his/her browser (so, the "images, audio, video, etc." aren't important) it's what your mobile device “sees” and can do with properly formatted contact data. Read the quote below for clarity’s sake:
When I posted that earlier in this thread, I didn't see a single response to my claims. This suggests to me that even the folks who are investing heavily in .tel are thinking about .tel addresses as turnkey websites with free hosting, which in my opinion, suggests most don't fully understand what they've purchased. Obviously, toe-to-toe, a standard TLD (.com/.net/.org) will always beat out a .tel if the two are competing as websites. .tel wasn't meant to compete against .com/.net/.org, it was meant to *standardize* contact data (note that, for example, phone numbers on .tel addresses must have the proper country codes or they can't be entered, etc.).
.tel is much more similar to a phone number than a webpage, though it shares some of the characteristics of both. If the folks who have invested heavily in them don't realize this (and soon), it'll become much harder to transfer this idea to the public.
One more try: The beauty of .tel is not what *you* see on the .tel "page," it's that…
(1) The contact data conforms to the same rules across all .tel addresses (so a mobile device knows how to rip and use a phone number regardless if it is asked to do so from Houses.tel, Joe.tel or NickName.tel).
(2) The data is stored not on mobile devices (like contact info is now), but on a central server, so that management of that data (updating, deleting, etc.) is controlled not by the mobile device owner, but by the data-"owner." This means that FINALLY, my friend Jill can change her contact info in MY phone and I don't have to do anything to make that happen. I don't even have to know that she's doing it, because Jill2.tel (assuming Jill.tel is taken) is already in my phone.
(3) If you follow the vanity number logic, .tel domains will have much higher recall rates than regular phone numbers (see the data below).
Please, folks, this is a telecom tool, not a TLD. Let's change the discussion and start discussing how we're going to get this idea out there, rather than talk about building "web pages" that are limited from step one. These web pages might be a good way to attempt to monetize in the interim (I say this having plenty that would be suitable for this -- Advertising.tel, Electronics.tel, Shoes.tel, Houses.tel, Tourism.tel, etc.), but they won't be a good way to go in the long run. Someday, I hope to be able to dial Tourism.tel on my phone and have whatever number I've entered on Tourism.tel ring on the other end (no intermediate step of me going to Tourism.tel to look up the number). Similarly, Tourism.tel could forward to the email address listed on Tourism.tel at the time. Just like vanity phone numbers, I could lease or sell the .tel. (And recall rates for vanity phone numbers versus "digits-only" numbers are extraordinarily higher.*)
Everyone, your thoughts? I'd especially like to hear (publicly) from those who have been constructive critics so far -- Acroplex, DubDubDubDot, bmugford, Steven, MicroGuy, etc. -- about these claims. If their opinions change even a little, perhaps folks will stop talking about only realizing the partial value of their .tel addresses through limited development and start talking about bridging the domain/telecom gap.
-------------------
*From NumericDomains.com, with permission:
“800response and their friends at Infosurv and e-Rewards teamed up to determine the consumer recall rates of vanity 800 numbers compared with recall rates of numeric toll-free phone numbers that are used in visual and audio advertisements… What they found supports our original supposition that 800 vanity telephone numbers retain significant value that continues to grow over time.
- Over 70% of respondents recall the vanity telephone number over the numeric version.
- Advertisers can expect an 84% improvement in recall rates for vanity 800 numbers vs. numeric phone numbers shown in visual media (TV, billboard, print) - and a much more significant 9-times higher recall rate in the case of audio (radio) ads.
- 58% of consumers prefer to dial a vanity 800 number vs. a numeric toll-free to reach a local business.
-------------------
My comment: In addition to the two primary benefits of .tel addresses listed above (the first two numbered points), .tel would mean a VANITY number for everyone. Individuals, businesses, etc. could benefit from those high recall rates. No longer: “Call me at 1-789-555-1234,” but “Call me at JohnDoe5.tel” (and 1-789-555-1234 would be the number your friend’s phone call routes through because it’s listed on JohnDoe5.tel).
-------------------
