More than testing.
-db- said:
"hotel suites" is one thing.. but why would anybody search for the phrase "hotelsuites.tel" when looking for a hotel?
The broad type-in traffic for this term is over 1,000,000 & growing according to
Google Insight.
However, the foward-looking goal of
.Tel is to create better brand visibility for both online & mobile markets, namely through offering relevant & concise business contact information which is sort of a shortcut to marketplace, except without all the ads.
Typing in
HotelSuites.tel would be better than sifting through
17,100,000 search results [actual No. of competing sites on Google] on the web for the keyword phrase 'hotel suites'.
-db- said:
Maybe I am misunderstanding your claim, and excitement. Perhaps you are just happy to see the .tel extension get indexed (at all)? You are testing the waters? Trying to see how to approach SEO in the future, etc.
Well, I'm not testing my SEO methodology as it is already proven. Rather, I'm measuring how the
search engine algorithms will react to
.TEL records & non-terminal NAPTRS.
If you remember, Google
'Host crowding algorithm change' limited search results to only to URL resources per domain, including subdomains.
Thus far, It appears that Google is treating each
NAPTR record & non-terminal NAPTRS as individual & unique.
Why is this significant?
This is significant because it will now be possible to have more than two URLs representing
one brand name on a given page result. (as in the case of HotelSuites.tel)
To test this SEO theory, try searching Namepros.com. How many page results are returned for this specific URL? only two excluding .Mobi. Right?......
But when you reference
HotelSuites.tel, Google is returning 7 page results for the primary NAPTR record. Bear in mind, each of these sub-domains can be optimized out.
I suspect that Google will probably address this soon, but I hope not!
Thanks db-.
Your thoughts,