I was thinking along the lines of a childrens extensioni tend to think of .xyz as a directory style extension
As JBL says, there are many better ways of doing this.
*
Well, .archi is now in General Availability.
*
I'm guessing somebody must've got a little tect offWell, .archi is now in General Availability.
The new gTLDs have enough of an uphill battle without using a strange truncated keyword.
What were they thinking?
The problem with managed TLDs (from the registry point of view) is that they are very slow to grow and even when they do grow, they incur more expenses for the registry. The problem for many of the new gTLDs at the moment is that there isn't any real confusion in the marketplace. There isn't any real awareness of these new gTLDs at all.I really wish that more of the gTLDs were managed.
They missed the launch of .PRO and thought that this would be a great idea?What were they thinking?
.com forever
Most of the kids look like victims of fetal alcohol syndrome or worse, so it might not mean too much.The interesting thing about that video is that none of the kids knew what .com meant and none of them cared.
The interesting thing about that video is that none of the kids knew what .com meant and none of them cared.
people won't say . anything when searching. only if they are searching for a specific site would anyone do that.
This one is funny too and it is interesting the one kid trys to give voice commands.
and the other end, seeing the geezer reaction to new tech. now think about voice search not type in "hint hint" and with new gtlds people will say joe dot shoes not joe shoes dot com when searching![]()
people won't say . anything when searching. only if they are searching for a specific site would anyone do that.
my point was unless someone was searching for a specific site, why would they include .com or a "dot" in any kind of search? if they are searching for joe shoes, they'll type in or say joe shoes. if they know its on a .com or .ca or .whatever they might type that in but otherwise, why would they?huh? I'm pretty sure you just ask a general question these days and you get options, No?
my point was unless someone was searching for a specific site, why would they include .com or a "dot" in any kind of search? if they are searching for joe shoes, they'll type in or say joe shoes. if they know its on a .com or .ca or .whatever they might type that in but otherwise, why would they?
I think you're right, this is why the gtlds have validity because they are the shortest word combos available online. .com is a gtld, so why would people search for commercials in the future when they can search in the specific niche.
But when going to a specific extension they will just have to say "dot" not "dot com"
.com will be the main business extension for a couple more decades but the gtlds will have their day imo.
the pulic knowing .com aside, the biggest hurdle for new gtlds to make their way into the public eye is the registries selling them, hoarding the good ones for themselves, charged ridiculous premium renewals on second rate domains, etc.I think you're right, this is why the gtlds have validity because they are the shortest word combos available online. .com is a gtld, so why would people search for commercials in the future when they can search in the specific niche.
But when going to a specific extension they will just have to say "dot" not "dot com"
.com will be the main business extension for a couple more decades but the gtlds will have their day imo.


