I have a 100's of domains that I want to develop, but it takes a lot of time to do it properly. Yes I know that unique, original content is optimum, but is there anything wrong with aggregating free content from the web?
- All Wikipedia content is free (as in beer and speech) and can be copied verbatum, but it's already mirrored all over the internet.
- I can find related rss feeds and pull content, having fresh content every day (hands free even!)
- There are all kinds of free article archives, for example http://www.articlesphere.com/ . The quality is generally horrid, a step above lorem ipsum, but it is free, keyword rich copy+paste content.
I can mass produce sites like this, probably 20 in the time it would take to make a single proper one, but is there any point? Will the great GoogleBot know what i'm doing and say "no rank for you"?
- All Wikipedia content is free (as in beer and speech) and can be copied verbatum, but it's already mirrored all over the internet.
- I can find related rss feeds and pull content, having fresh content every day (hands free even!)
- There are all kinds of free article archives, for example http://www.articlesphere.com/ . The quality is generally horrid, a step above lorem ipsum, but it is free, keyword rich copy+paste content.
I can mass produce sites like this, probably 20 in the time it would take to make a single proper one, but is there any point? Will the great GoogleBot know what i'm doing and say "no rank for you"?
