Dynadot

So I definitely..,

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

wcpthree

Established Member
Impact
217
Just spent over an hour with a dictionary in my lap trying to register 1 word domains. No success. I will keep trying though. Please nobobody steal my idea :)
 
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Thank you everybody for your input!
 
0
•••
To speed up your process to failure copy about 250 words per page drop them into Microsoft Word. Copy the entire column from Microsoft Word and go to godaddy bulk search and drop them in. I've already been down this road wasted hrs on this. You can find words but no keywords and nothing with significant value Imo
 
1
•••
Here is the shortcut and the way professionals get it done.

You can download a text file of the entire English dictionary. Use Google, you will find it.

Then download the Zone file... which is the list of all registered domains in the world. Use Google, you will find it.

Toss both databases into Microsoft Access, and then run a DELETE query for dictionary words that are exact matches for domains in the Zone file. Use Google, you can teach yourself.

You will have to split the .COM zone file into 3 different databases, because the size of the file is massive. Google.

What you will have left is a list of exact matching dictionary words that are unregistered.

Do this once a month, because names are always falling through the cracks; so to speak. You can add to the dictionary database lists of last names, first names, whatever.

I registered a few decent names using this method. It's not the best way to hunt for domains, but it's another way to look where others aren't looking.

Go ahead and start clicking that 'like' and 'thanks' button below. ;)
 
Last edited:
6
•••
1
•••
1
•••
You can download a text file of the entire English dictionary. Use Google, you will find it.

Then download the Zone file... which is the list of all registered domains in the world. Use Google, you will find it.
Yes, but why limit yourself to English keywords ;) Granted, the market is more limited for foreign keywords.
Generally, domains left unregistered are available for a reason.

On the other hand, there are things you can do with zone files. For example you can cross check several different zones. So you can find domains taken in certain TLDs (eg .net .org) but available in .com. Plenty of .net are unregistered in .com.

But it's probably not the most productive approach to domaining anyway.
 
2
•••
Yes, but why limit yourself to English keywords ;) Granted, the market is more limited for foreign keywords.
Generally, domains left unregistered are available for a reason.

On the other hand, there are things you can do with zone files. For example you can cross check several different zones. So you can find domains taken in certain TLDs (eg .net .org) but available in .com. Plenty of .net are unregistered in .com.

But it's probably not the most productive approach to domaining anyway.

I agree with you 100%. To the EN database I added lists of the most popular last names, first names, country names, and foreign words that have to do with buying/selling and tech.

I used this strategy to pick up "Brasils" as a .COM, as it is the natural spelling of "Brazil". Portuguese speakers prefer this spelling in South America. So saying Brasils is referencing the entire Brasil region, or that which is possessed by Brasil. It was previously registered since 1996 (not that it matters),and dropped sometime in the month I regged it. I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't have it as a country match in my list.

I think it's a pretty decent geo/travel domain for someone in the Brasil area. Would I prefer Brasils {d0t} br, yes; but who knows; a future buyer may be a corporate entity that prefers .COM over geo. I think it's worth the hold.

It's defiantly not the most efficient way to buy, but it's something I do once a month to see if anyone missed a reasonably decent name I can get for a coupon.
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back