dotnom said:
I alredy notified Sedo for this before i post here
The url references are not a proof of an illegality
The don’t consider the privacy breach an illegality but a bad business tactic that expose the brand
However when you take the information from a person’s account and make them public you should first state it clearly to your agreement and ask him to approve these modifications. I didn’t see this happen to sedo but found it accidentally
I also can’t understand why all these are not optional or selectable. I can’t assume to think that Sedo’s managers don’t know what a variable is
I created a seperate post here
http://www.namepros.com/parking-and...030-serious-privacy-breach-from-sedo-com.html
It was not you who brought up this being illegal

I was replying more to the other allegations of this change being illegal.
This is what I found on their privacy policies:
"In general, you can browse a large portion of the site without telling us who you are or revealing any personal information about yourself. Once you give us your personal information, you are not anonymous to us. If you choose to use our services, we may require you to provide contact and identity information, billing information, and
other personal information as indicated on the forms throughout the site.
You always have the option not to provide information by choosing not to use a particular service or feature."
Also: "If you choose to make bids, buy or sell through the site, we may collect information about your bidding, buying and selling behavior and transactions."
Also: "In order to facilitate interaction among site users, our site may allow you limited access to other users' information."
Finally: "We reserve the right to make changes to this Privacy Policy at any time by posting the amended terms on the site, so please check it frequently. If we make material changes to this Policy, all amended terms shall automatically be effective 30 days after they are initially posted on the site."
It seems to me that they are well within there privacy policy. That is why I am asking what lines you guys think are being breached, so I can comment on that specifically, because I am not seeing them violating anything.
As far as them telling everyone about it, they did. There was an email sent a couple of weeks ago now. In their policies you have the option to opt out of anything by simply not using it (in this case don't list them for sale). I would guess that the reason it is not a selctable option, is because it is a test, they are trying to gather data about how effective it is and gauge the users' responses, and they want to keep it simple. If there are other reasons hopefully Carolyn and Stephanie can fill us in.