- Impact
- 326
Who is the safest registrar for .in domains ? I would especially like to hear from those who have developed high traffic .in sites.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.


dnk said:Who is the safest registrar for .in domains ?
dnk said:I would especially like to hear from those who have developed high traffic .in sites.
Thanks in advance.
dnk said:I would especially like to hear from those who have developed high traffic .in sites.
dnk said:Who is the safest registrar for .in domains ? I would especially like to hear from those who have developed high traffic .in sites.
Thanks in advance.
dnk said:In India, competence does not matter, contacts do.
Funny how people find you patronising or mocking when you ask for some proof why they think what they do.dnk said:Like some else said, in another post
http://www.namepros.com/2553790-post43.html
I also feel that you have an extremely patronising and mocking atitude.
dnk said:The biggest anti- .in, co.in argument is common to doing all business in India, corruption is rampant, few people / companies play by the rulebook.
dnk said:I have far more older, developed and popular .in sites than you have
But people advertise URLs on television, the web and in print everyday... so I must be missing something here.dnk said:I do not reveal my site names on forums, because they are then subject to DDOS attacks.
Tell me the facts and the ground reality.dnk said:There is a lot of hype about .in, which is not based on facts or the ground reality.
dnk said:Safe as in chances of your account getting tampered are low and information remains confidential.
.....
In India, competence does not matter, contacts do.
dnk said:If you have a valuable high traffic developed domain or even a nice domain, you obviously do not want to lose it, because some one was incompetent or wants to keep a "friend" happy .
mwzd said:Funny how people find you patronising or mocking when you ask for some proof why they think what they do.
mwzd said:And since we're quoting please read my rejoinder too -
http://www.namepros.com/2553856-post45.html
trevor said:It's about you saying your opinion is based on "fact" while no matter what someone else says, their "facts" are wrong.

