I was just checking out thedomains blog of Michael who is also into the new gTLDs and saw his latest article about Rick. Looks like the new gTLDs are getting more and more traction with serious domainers entering the arena
I'm guessing they were mostly at his own tlds.
I slightly misappropriated your quote, but to me this about sums up the entirety of the "neo" gTLD gangbusters ruse. Shady from the get-go.I'm slowly losing faith that anyone is doing anything properly.
I'm not an expert on which gtld's he is the registrar for. I think .link and .ninja are his. But my point is basically, that he isn't paying much, if anything, for these domains. And he isn't probably paying the prices we pay for those gtld's he doesn't control. He's stating he controls the keywords. What keywords in which gtld's? They might be goldmines, or they might be a repeat of his flowers.mobi purchase. Only time will tell. But one thing is for sure. He won't be selling anything cheap. Not until they bomb, at least.
i have not heard that rick has his own tlds ,,,,,,, can anyone expand on this please
That's Frank, with .link.
Think there was just confusion with getting Frank Schilling mixed up with Rick Schwartz. Frank is the one with the new registry, lots of new extensions coming.
That project is a joke.
ah ok lol
Well, he might be serious with it, but selling premium sub-domains? I just don't see it. And it's kind of getting clowned on in the comments on his site.
oh ok, i know you guys dont see it but i think gtlds have higher sub domain potential than the .com.
oh ok, i know you guys dont see it but i think gtlds have higher sub domain potential than the .com.
You might say used.cars but that's a domain, even tho it kinda looks like a subdomain.
It is a subdomain of the root domain cars.
So, .xyz looks like it did 31,119 the first 24 hours.
First day is 18,384 - http://ntldstats.com/tld/xyz
Since it launches sometime in the afternoon, first day is more like half a day.
Think .club did more actually, 26,000 first day, remember posting about it. - https://www.namepros.com/threads/th...se-and-discussion.817267/page-12#post-4642081
Think .co did 60,000 first day? 300,000 first week
Was reading some people posting about some unusual numbers at Netsol, then somebody said they got an xyz free for their .com:
"netsol users got an email from Netsol offering a complementary .xyz for their .com FREE for 1 year"
more to that:
“.i will explain how it was possible. i recently got the email from Netsol offering me a complementary .xyz for my so-so .com free for 1 year. and in order to decline such an offer i had to visit a link and click decline, otherwise the domain would be mine automatically."
That can't be right can it?
Blog on it:
http://www.thedomains.com/2014/06/03/did-networksolutions-com-give-away-free-xyz-domain-names/
Not sure if that's true, tried going thru some old emails, couldn't find it.
Next few days will give a better picture.
I'm saying if .cars was the new extension, not cars.com
What's an example of a subdomain with one of these new extensions? Let's say, sex.guru
"but in reality used.cars is a subdomain"
"but used.cars.com is a subdomain of a subdomain"
What on both of those? The first is just a domain, just like sex.guru. The second "used.cars.com" is just a subdomain.
Can't tell if you're just playing around with those 2 examples.
oh ok, i know you guys dont see it but i think gtlds have higher sub domain potential than the .com.
used.cars -> Used is a Subdomain of the TLD cars
used.cars.com-> Used is a Subdomain of the domain cars.com and cars is a subdomain of the TLD com
I don't know how anyone would say used.cars is inferior to used.cars.com.
I do know how you could say used.cars is inferior to usedcars.com
'Potential' can always be perceived as higher when starting from nothing. For me, investing in a subdomain of anyone elses private domain (regardless of the tld) is plain foolishness unless it was associated with some sort of existing community that could be mined commercially, ie 'businessmember'.facebook.com (assuming they ever did that)
I don't think facebook would need the .com to show they are legit, .facebook would be just fine.