anyone who seeks to be moral arbiter (and a loud, angry, noncompromising one at that) needs to be without reproach. when you start defending yourself by saying "that depends on your moral compass," well,...sorry, but you're toast.
if you acknowledge, mr. pendleton, that your own "moral compass" may be questioned and possibly found by others to be lacking, you kind of lose the authority to condemn anyone else.
I'm not saying that the person who registered MichaelJacksonAutopsyPhotos.com shouldn't be condemned but you are not the person to do it. your team needs a new champion.
"Let ye who is without blame..." and all that.
One, maybe two, over the top posts i can understand. but when people can go on for days about how immoral and unethical someone else is without once stopping to examine him or her self...
that person is without shame.
and to say that your blatant tm violation is "the equivalent of reuters reporting the news"...
please, mr. pendleton, say that you're had one beer too many tonight and pack it in. and do not inflict us any more with your...