Galel said:
If there were any .mobi that I'd think would do well, its the short ones.
Maybe when the 1 and 2 letter .mobi's are released, it'll cause the LLL to pick back up?
Sounds like someone here might have a length complex :hehe:
I actually had the same feeling over 2 years ago. The shorter, the better. I figured people wouldn't want to bother typing in longer names on a mobile.
I was wrong.
My shortest developed name gets about 25 X less traffic than some of my longest developed names.
Even in my parked names, there seems to be no difference. My LLL's get very little traffic while multiple two and three word phrases bypass them. My longest name (parked) is freecrosswordpuzzles dot mobi and it ranks # 3 on my list of most visitors to a parked name.
Sure, one and two letter mobis will be sought after and valuable. No different than other TLD's.
The real value in LLL's , LL's & L domains seems to be their attraction of end users....what we all want. The more companies that fit the acronym, the higher the probability of a sale. With that said, I'm feeling pretty good about LLL mobi future. Basing your failures of an extension on the lack of individuals not willing to pluck down $$ for a "crappy" LLL (which is pretty much what's left) is quite interesting. I saw the "Buy, Buy, Buy" frenzy of the peak of LLL.mobis and sat back shaking my head.
But saying longer mobis don't have a shot is quite short sighted indeed. The keywords, no matter the length, are still rulers of the mobile web. The only question that remains is, are the keywords that people search from a PC going to be the same keywords (or popularity) of mobile searches :?