LLL.IN DROPPING LIST SCANNER

[hemantraj]

LLL.IN DROP SCANNER.
Previously there were many threads discussing dropping lll.in
Nowadays there are no list of new dropping lll.in from any user.why is it so.
Are no lll.in dropping???
If yes how to search those dropping names.
If anyone regularly scans lll.in drops.plse update lists here.
Thanks in advance..

 

[kemjika11]

Someone is hungry for LLL.ins...lol. I think you generally have to pay the experts to get them for you or you get lucky and catch em...1-4 in a year. Supply has shrunk alot.

 

[FPForum]

.in registrars arent allowed to engage in dropcatching

They aren't, but they do anyways..lol. Who's gonna be the one to report Mitsu to NIXI? :x

 

[kriss05]

Found this:

Registry Advisory LA 01: Sales of .IN Names by Registrars

Advisory No. LA 01

15th FEBRUARY 2005

Advisory to the Registrars against any sort of hoarding, auctioning or selling of the .IN domains at prices higher than they usually charge from their

customers

The .IN Accredited Registrars have been appointed to market and sell the .IN domain names to the public at large. Because of their critical role in the registration of .IN domain names the Registrars are at an undue advantage to register the generic and other popular domains available under the .IN and auction them or sell them at prices higher than the usual price they charge for the domain names. In the public interest it has been decided that any kind of hoarding, auctioning or selling of the .IN domain names at a higher price than they are regularly charging by the Registrars should be discouraged and penalized.

The Registrars are advised through this advisory to desist, at all times, from involving themselves, or through their re-sellers, in any way in the squatting, grabbing, hoarding, auctioning or selling of the .IN domain names at a higher price than they are regularly charging from the public. Any such involvement of the Registrar will lead to termination of Accreditation, financial penalty and any other legal action as provided under the laws of India.

 

[kriss05]

So this means that .in registrars and affiliated with them structures aren't allowed to be involved in dropcatching. So they can't keep domains for themselves, nor they can charge more than regular registration fee, i.e they can't offer dropcatching services. But from this it follows that ordinary people can use registrars APIs to dropcatch domains for themselves, as they pay ordinary fee in case of successful catching.

 

[Chirag]

april time was diff, now its diff brother. Anyways best of luck

 

[meditang]

Only mxp.in drops today

 

[Michael R.]

These last months, LLL.in dropcatching competition has drastically increased.
Good luck to catch only one!

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

 

[aceeca]

You wont be able to catch any so dont waste your time, some biggies catch them within 1 sec of drop so ye forget it brother

april time was diff, now its diff brother. Anyways best of luck

Someone is hungry for LLL.ins...lol. I think you generally have to pay the experts to get them for you or you get lucky and catch em...1-4 in a year. Supply has shrunk alot.

These last months, LLL.in dropcatching competition has drastically increased.
Good luck to catch only one!

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

Things have changed so much in the last few months. All the above are 100% on the money . but good luck.

These days there are hardly anyone offering a decent LLL

 

[Branded Domains]

yeah no drops...but bought 5 3l.in for $40 each..(all are Chinese premium)...let us see if Chinese friends are interested in 3l.in or 3N,4N,5N .in...Also bought 3L.us for $15 each

 

[FPForum]

ExpiredDomains.net is usually pretty accurate for listing dropping LLL.in... As for catching them, these days most all are caught by one of two people. The first has two accredited registrars with Registry.in, the second has really high spending (likely Super Bulk Pricing) with DynaDot. I'd look at going with the first option if it were me.. You could probably setup a few registrars yourself for what it would cost to get Super Bulk Pricing

 

[webm]

ExpiredDomains.net is usually pretty accurate for listing dropping LLL.in... As for catching them, these days most all are caught by one of two people. The first has two accredited registrars with Registry.in, the second has really high spending (likely Super Bulk Pricing) with DynaDot. I'd look at going with the first option if it were me.. You could probably setup a few registrars yourself for what it would cost to get Super Bulk Pricing

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

 

[FPForum]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

I am aware that NIXI doesn't provide zone file access. With that in mind, it doesn't matter what website you use, each would need to try and come up with the lists themselves. I don't pay close enough attention to IN to know the exact amount he has, but it's still the route I would go. Even DynaDot Super Bulk won't compete when you get enough registrar competition.

 

[FPForum]

We will discuss this on Skype bro!

You know my contact. Reach out when you have a little bit of time to chat!

 

[NameInvest]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

Bro to be Registrar it needs only 1000 USD not 5000 USD and being registrar is always faster then any other if you being as registrar and use own registry api it would be fastest

 

[Soofi]

They aren't, but they do anyways..lol. Who's gonna be the one to report Mitsu to NIXI? :x

NIXI is aware of everything

 

[FPForum]

Here's a link to the Terms and Conditions for registrars which you guys might find helpful. I got them after contacting NIXI myself about becoming a registrar.
https://registry.in/system/files/Terms_and_Conditions_for_Registrants_1.pdf

They won't release the exact limits for each command, but I can guess they are similar to the other registries I've worked with in the past. Considering the drop period for IN domains is so short the limits don't really mean much aside from the total number of connections available for all registrars as a whole per second (usually in the low-mid hundreds)

What Soofi said is exactly what I've heard in the past as well, that registrars are not allowed to drop catch and/or resell names themselves. Keep in mind, if you're a registrar then you aren't using an API, you're using the EPP (extensive provisioning protocol) to send your requests. It's similar to what an API might look like, but requires a different kind of connection and not just a web request with some parameters in it.

I guess if Mitsu does it and gets away with it then NIXI must not care too much. I'll do the EPP stuff if someone else wants to get the registrar(s) setup, lol

 

[Chirag]

Can anyone tell which registrar API is best to catch dropping .in for the average Joe?

none, for average joe its possible only when thr are no requests from registrars. So ask every registrar to stop for few days and then try it ?

 

[Chirag]

You wont be able to catch any so dont waste your time, some biggies catch them within 1 sec of drop so ye forget it brother

 

[hemantraj]

Thats not true. I got 2 of them regged in end of april very easily.but if som1 provides dropping list in advance.it would be easier to cath them through snapnames or pool

 

[Chirag]

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

Haven't seen a 3L.in in that list from days

 

[Chirag]

am pretty much interested in buying 3L.ins, let me know if you know any seller

 

[Branded Domains]

just contact them u will get in cheaper...btw I will list it soon

 

[Michael R.]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

But I think a bulk user, even super bulk, can't compete with a registrar, that has a direct link to the registry.

 

[Soofi]

And still no one is taking action against that first option :P