LLL.IN DROPPING LIST SCANNER

[hemantraj]

LLL.IN DROP SCANNER.
Previously there were many threads discussing dropping lll.in
Nowadays there are no list of new dropping lll.in from any user.why is it so.
Are no lll.in dropping???
If yes how to search those dropping names.
If anyone regularly scans lll.in drops.plse update lists here.
Thanks in advance..

 

[Chirag]

You wont be able to catch any so dont waste your time, some biggies catch them within 1 sec of drop so ye forget it brother

 

[hemantraj]

Thats not true. I got 2 of them regged in end of april very easily.but if som1 provides dropping list in advance.it would be easier to cath them through snapnames or pool

 

[Chirag]

april time was diff, now its diff brother. Anyways best of luck

 

[meditang]

Only mxp.in drops today

 

[kemjika11]

Someone is hungry for LLL.ins...lol. I think you generally have to pay the experts to get them for you or you get lucky and catch em...1-4 in a year. Supply has shrunk alot.

 

[Michael R.]

These last months, LLL.in dropcatching competition has drastically increased.
Good luck to catch only one!

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

 

[aceeca]

You wont be able to catch any so dont waste your time, some biggies catch them within 1 sec of drop so ye forget it brother

april time was diff, now its diff brother. Anyways best of luck

Someone is hungry for LLL.ins...lol. I think you generally have to pay the experts to get them for you or you get lucky and catch em...1-4 in a year. Supply has shrunk alot.

These last months, LLL.in dropcatching competition has drastically increased.
Good luck to catch only one!

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

Things have changed so much in the last few months. All the above are 100% on the money . but good luck.

These days there are hardly anyone offering a decent LLL

 

[Chirag]

But dropping list is available on www.expireddomains.net

Haven't seen a 3L.in in that list from days

 

[Branded Domains]

yeah no drops...but bought 5 3l.in for $40 each..(all are Chinese premium)...let us see if Chinese friends are interested in 3l.in or 3N,4N,5N .in...Also bought 3L.us for $15 each

 

[Chirag]

am pretty much interested in buying 3L.ins, let me know if you know any seller

 

[Branded Domains]

just contact them u will get in cheaper...btw I will list it soon

 

[FPForum]

ExpiredDomains.net is usually pretty accurate for listing dropping LLL.in... As for catching them, these days most all are caught by one of two people. The first has two accredited registrars with Registry.in, the second has really high spending (likely Super Bulk Pricing) with DynaDot. I'd look at going with the first option if it were me.. You could probably setup a few registrars yourself for what it would cost to get Super Bulk Pricing

 

[webm]

ExpiredDomains.net is usually pretty accurate for listing dropping LLL.in... As for catching them, these days most all are caught by one of two people. The first has two accredited registrars with Registry.in, the second has really high spending (likely Super Bulk Pricing) with DynaDot. I'd look at going with the first option if it were me.. You could probably setup a few registrars yourself for what it would cost to get Super Bulk Pricing

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

 

[Michael R.]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

But I think a bulk user, even super bulk, can't compete with a registrar, that has a direct link to the registry.

 

[FPForum]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

I am aware that NIXI doesn't provide zone file access. With that in mind, it doesn't matter what website you use, each would need to try and come up with the lists themselves. I don't pay close enough attention to IN to know the exact amount he has, but it's still the route I would go. Even DynaDot Super Bulk won't compete when you get enough registrar competition.

 

[Soofi]

And still no one is taking action against that first option :P

 

[FPForum]

And still no one is taking action against that first option :P

I have quietly been working on something over here. But, will need someone with the accreditation part mainly because I don't care about IN enough to buy that myself.. lol

 

[Soofi]

I have quietly been working on something over here. But, will need someone with the accreditation part mainly because I don't care about IN enough to buy that myself.. lol

We will discuss this on Skype bro!

 

[FPForum]

We will discuss this on Skype bro!

You know my contact. Reach out when you have a little bit of time to chat!

 

[NameInvest]

Andrew,

As for ExpiredDomains, Marco has his own database that he maintains which is pretty huge but not complete as the .in Registry (NIXI) doesn't release the official root zone file for public access so it's only a matter of how big your database can be, but it can never be complete. Just my two cents.

For the other issues, The first guy has not two, but actually 5 public registrars (and a few more private) that he uses for drop-catching .in names. And for the second guy, yes, he has the "Super Bulk" tier. Though I agree with you that having your own pool of registrars would definitely help with your catching rate but it may not necessarily be the best "Cost Effective Option". For starters, it would require 6000$ dollars bare minimum for the registrar, as COST, not as a funding. Whereas in dynadot, $5000 gets you in the super bulk status, out of which, all 5000 is completely usable. That's why I personally prefer the second option. Again, just my two cents : )

Bro to be Registrar it needs only 1000 USD not 5000 USD and being registrar is always faster then any other if you being as registrar and use own registry api it would be fastest

 

[Soofi]

Bro to be Registrar it needs only 1000 USD not 5000 USD and being registrar is always faster then any other if you being as registrar and use own registry api it would be fastest

You will still have competition from other registrars trying for same names :P

 

[Templr]

These could be good Investments for the next five++ years due to India's catchup with Internet speed, but you will have the pyramid buyers.

 

[Aslindo]

Are registars allowed to do drop catching?

 

[Soofi]

Are registars allowed to do drop catching?

.in registrars arent allowed to engage in dropcatching