.link sales report

[mobilespecialists]

I have not found it using the search option so I thought its time to start such a thread.
I'm a big fan of .LINK domains though I was very sceptical to the so called new TLDs.
The reason why I like .LINK though no fan of the new TLDs are:

• "link" has a natural universal relation to Internet. We use sentences like "send me the link". You can combine it with every keyword. And its logical - a link to the keyword.
  
• it's very easy to remember. Its also new so it sounds interesting. It's just sexy
  
• in my opinion it sounds better than "web" as long you are not some working in the web industry
• the word has got common in other languages. In Polish we also say link, in German too. Though for some languages it sounds better than others. For example in general german domains with a keyword and .link sound more natural and nicer than in Polish.

So far I have bought some. Maybe my best is notebooks.link. But jet sold none. Since the domain is at start I was interested in the sales. I really think .link will happen to be a big thing.

 

[GoKaizen]

Flippa sale

Crowdfund.link - $1

 

[Hypersot]

I have earned 4 cents in revenue from my referrer link ... maybe that's something :P

ofc no sales in .link for me, or any other ngtld for that matter

 

[Michael Ehrhardt]

da.mba 400$

 

[GoKaizen]

Again, any recent sales?

Seems like this is a dead extension for aftermarket sales. Unless you are the North Sound Names.

http://www.hosterstats.com/link-website-usage-survey.php

 

[GoKaizen]

Beauty.link - $117

Sedo, wasn't sold by registry looks like.

Still feel Blockchain.link should sell.

 

[mobilespecialists]

Hoped so much in this .link stuff. Was wrong.

 

[MolaRam]

Don't like .link at all. It means its just a link and not an app or site.

 

[GoKaizen]

@equity78 had this sale.

https://tldinvestors.com/2020/03/sponsored-link.html

Also;

Shopify.link - $3,800
Finance.link - $5,635

 

[GoKaizen]

In case anyone is interested.

https://www.namepros.com/threads/link-thread-sales-regs-discussion-news-debates.1282438/

 

[Tatiana_B]

preety zone for my opinion but I own only one .link domain name orderstar.link

 

[topdom]

.link, not too bad, better than .click, but investable ones are already premium with premium renewal.
Maybe good for the registry, but not for me.

 

[BoGoKing]

.link, not too bad, better than .click, but investable ones are already premium with premium renewal.
Maybe good for the registry, but not for me.

thanks for chiming in topdown.....i luv your comment "not too bad" It's sort of like what Rob M. said to me, ".LINK is no worse than .XYZ". i believe i have a few "investable ones" like Nursing.link, Hollywood.link and Socialism.link to name a few. Premium renewal for these is actually $116 which isn't too bad.

One of the reasons I like .link is because "link" is considered a keyword and it's served Linkedin well. The FACT that most single word .com's are already in use makes .link a viable alternative.

Finally, the new owners of the .LINK extension have identified some nuances they believe will make them successful. I've read about their plans, and have invested accordingly.

 

[MadAboutDomains]

One of the reasons I like .link is because "link" is considered a keyword and it's served Linkedin well.

What does LinkedIn having "link" as a SUBSTRING have anything to do with anything....

I suppose that inked has served them well as well? And "in"?

Sorry but it's just stupid.

 

[BoGoKing]

What does LinkedIn having "link" as a SUBSTRING have anything to do with anything....

I suppose that inked has served them well as well? And "in"?

Sorry but it's just stupid.

So you think "keywords" like link and linked are stupid do you? Do you have any idea why they're considered keywords

There was a time i thought we might be able to work together, but I'm glad it didn't happen

 

[MadAboutDomains]

So you think "keywords" like link and linked are stupid do you? Do you have any idea why they're considered keywords

There was a time i thought we might be able to work together, but I'm glad it didn't happen

The keywords in their name are Linked and In. Nothing has served them well in the sense that you described. Therein lies the stupidity.

With all due respect I could never work with someone who deviates so far from the point that it is impossible to have a conversation that means anything just so that they can repeat the same inane points over and over again.

 

[lock]

http://dnpric.es/?q=.link

Domain name	Date​	Price​	Broker​
eth.link​	September 2022​	$ 851,919.31 USD​	Dynadot​
app.link​	April 2016​	$ 30,000.00 USD​	Uniregistry​
cloud.link​	July 2016​	$ 18,500.00 USD​	Uniregistry​
secure.link​	August 2015​	$ 15,000.00 USD​	Uniregistry​
8.link​	January 2016​	$ 14,500.00 USD​	NameJet/NamesCon/RightoftheDot​
we.link​	January 2016​	$ 11,000.00 USD​	NameJet auction​
e.link​	January 2016​	$ 10,200.00 USD​	NameJet auction​
smart.link​	September 2015​	$ 10,000.00 USD​	Uniregistry​
z.link​	May 2016​	$ 10,000.00 USD​	Uniregistry​
one.link​	November 2020​	€ 8,000.00 EUR​	Sedo​
one.link​	November 2021​	€ 8,000.00 EUR​	Sedo​
i.link​	January 2016​	$ 8,250.00 USD​	NameJet/NamesCon/RightoftheDot​
hello.link​	July 2015​	$ 7,500.00 USD​	Uniregistry​

 

[Robert27]

please discard. Thought it was a showcase thread not a sales thread.

 

[BoGoKing]

The keywords in their name are Linked and In. Nothing has served them well in the sense that you described. Therein lies the stupidity.

With all due respect I could never work with someone who deviates so far from the point that it is impossible to have a conversation that means anything just so that they can repeat the same inane points over and over again.

I agree....that would really be STUPID .....both link and linked are keywords

 

[MadAboutDomains]

I agree....that would really be STUPID .....both link and linked are keywords

No, "link" isn't a keyword of "LinkedIn".

The words in their brand name are exclusively as follows:

- Linked
- In

In that sense, "link" hasn't "served them well".

 

[BoGoKing]

No, "link" isn't a keyword of "LinkedIn".

The words in their brand name are exclusively as follows:

- Linked
- In

In that sense, "link" hasn't "served them well".

The past tense of LINK is LINKED.....so "link" hasn't served them well? Are you MAD