HappyBunny no offence but I think you get the jest of the L-L-L.com thing.
I think youโre trying to squeeze out info you know already but just want it justified. Your posts donโt make sense. L-L-L.com is short sweet and brandable Period!
All I "know" about L-L-L can be read on my previous posts.
I am not hiding anything.
What do you mean by
"trying to squeeze out info you know already but just want it justified" ?
What info?
TheBaldOne: I am not American, maybe that's why I have different perception regarding acronyms. But if L-L-L acronyms are good then we might as well invest in L-L-L-L acronyms too.
buckshotdots, thank you for your advice. There are 80 pages... Wow.
hugegrowth, your post is very informative. You made me realize the nice thing about L-L-L: "One thing the dash does, is it really separates the letters and makes them stand out clearly."
Maybe that's the answer why their prices are so high.
Used for acronyms, AND clarity.
One thing, though: how could you say 25% are developed sites? Do you mean 25% of all registered L-L-L.coms? That's a pretty big number and I find it hard to believe...
equity78: yes there is a reason for everything. I took the name "nosupplies.com" as an example, the "no" can be anything of course. Maybe nysupplies.com.
The other thing being missed here is these were domains regged for $7 where people are selling at 5,10,100,500 times what they paid to register the domain.
I started this thread to find the "why".
The sales are amazing, but why?
Upon reading all your replies I think the answer is best summarized by gemstar:
L-L-L.com is short sweet and brandable Period!