Dynadot — .com Transfer

ICANN Blog FAQ on Registerfly.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
I hadn't seen this until today, and if it's been posted I've missed it. ICANN posted this blog on 4/4/07:

http://blog.icann.org/?p=85

Here's a partial quote. If you have names there, you should read the whole FAQ:
Q. If ICANN terminated Registerfly’s accreditation agreement on 31 March, why do they still claim to be accredited?

A. Registerfly decided to file an arbitration action to stall the termination. For better or worse, this is their right under the accreditation agreement. The accreditation agreement is a contract that ICANN has to follow. If we didn’t follow the agreement, Registerfly could potentially continue operations as an accredited registrar indefinitely. So please be patient and understand that we are doing everything we legally can to protect registrants without jeopardizing our right to terminate Registerfly’ accreditation.

Q. What will happen when Registerfly’s accreditation is finally terminated?

A. There are a number of paths we could pursue, and to some extent, the one we follow will depend on the behavior of Registerfly. In the ‘big picture’ the process looks like this: (1) Registerfly loses its access to the registries; (2) a competent and qualified accredited registrar is selected by ICANN to receive a ‘bulk transfer’ of names (and underlying data) from Registerfly to it; (3) former Registerfly customers will be able to contact the new registrar to manage or transfer their names.

Q. How does the bulk transfer work? UPDATED

A. ICANN has the power to approve a bulk transfer from one registrar to another. We will not do so unless the transfer is in the community interest. We have told Kevin Medina he should name a “gaining registrar” now and stop hurting his customers, but he has not done so. If Kevin does name a gaining registrar, we will only approve the transfer if it is in the community interest.

In a bulk transfer, there is no fee to the customer. However, a bulk transfer is different from a normal transfer in that it does not add a year to the registration.

Some people have observed that there are names in their Registerfly control panels that are no longer registered at Registerfly. In the event of a bulk transfer, the registries will move the names that are actually at Registerfly to another registrar. It makes no difference whether Registerfly thinks it has the name or not.

Q. Why doesn’t ICANN bulk transfer the names now?


A. Like it or not, Registerfly is still technically accredited, pending the outcome of our lawsuit against them or their arbitration action. Because Registerfly is accredited, we cannot initiate a bulk transfer. When Registerfly’s termination is final, we will bulk transfer the names, either to a registrar suggested by Kevin Medina or one chosen by ICANN.
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
When Registerfly’s termination is final, we will bulk transfer the names, either to a registrar suggested by Kevin Medina or one chosen by ICANN.

That's the important part and why people who panicked over the whole affair aren't gaining much.
 
0
•••
labrocca said:
When Registerfly’s termination is final, we will bulk transfer the names, either to a registrar suggested by Kevin Medina or one chosen by ICANN.

That's the important part and why people who panicked over the whole affair aren't gaining much.

And if Kevin Medina is going to pick, what would maximize his monetary gain or minimize his loss?....Selling to someone who does NOT have low prices rather than letting ICANN move them with nothing for him. Someone might pay him $5 or so per domain if they think they can get a good percentage of renewals at $15-25. If he picks, there's no incentive for it to go to a registrar with $6-$9 reg/renew fees.
 
0
•••
Yes but if it goes to a registrar via bulk we do not pay anything. This might piss off the registrar being chosen. Also the gaining registrar may not want to deal with the thousands of support requests that will be needed initially.

It's gonna be a mess and imho ICANN will most likely work with a reputable registrar like Godaddy, Enom, or Moniker.
 
0
•••
it might be better for icann to choose a handful of gaining registrars rather than medina choosing one...
 
0
•••
The part I noticed was further down. After assuring those whose names were about to drop that they would not be deleted (hope hope)...

ICANNT said:
Q. What if my name was deleted before the registries began prohibiting deletions by Registerfly?

A. If the name is available for registration, by all means, register it.
If the name was registered by someone else, you have at least four options:

1. Work out an agreement with the current registrant.

2. Wait and see if the current registrant lets it expire.

3. File a lawsuit in court against the current registrant.

4. For cases involving “abusive registrations” (this is a narrow category, so you should proceed with caution), begin an administrative proceeding under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy.
"File a lawsuit in court against the current registrant"
EXCUSE ME????

Assuming there is no trademark involved (and ICANN says nothing of TM's), the new registrants legally purchased their names from ICANN's system and probably from ICANN's (very wealthy these days) drop catchers. Barring trademarks I see no grounds for suing the new registrants.

This is ICANN's mess and now they want the victims to fight EACH OTHER.
 
0
•••
accentnepal said:
The part I noticed was further down. After assuring those whose names were about to drop that they would not be deleted (hope hope)...


"File a lawsuit in court against the current registrant"
EXCUSE ME????

Assuming there is no trademark involved (and ICANN says nothing of TM's), the new registrants legally purchased their names from ICANN's system and probably from ICANN's (very wealthy these days) drop catchers. Barring trademarks I see no grounds for suing the new registrants.

This is ICANN's mess and now they want the victims to fight EACH OTHER.

I agree. If not a TM domain, your only recourse would be against those who have been negligent in not allowing you to manage your domain. That would be Regsiterfly (join the crowd), or possibly ICANN for not acting sooner (harder to prove in court).

Unless you're talking a $X,XXX domain, the legal fees would cost more than the domain is worth. Probably best to file a small claims case against registerfly and hope there's an asset left lien or account to garnish.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
accentnepal said:
This is ICANN's mess and now they want the victims to fight EACH OTHER.

This whole matter would never have happened if Registerfly didn't cause this
whole mess to begin with. ICANN is trying to clean it up, although that's not
stopping people from demanding they do more than what they currently are
able to do.

But what's done is done. It's up to you to decide whether it's worth pursuing
the matter or not on your own rather than relying on others to handle it.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back