NameSilo

Could L-L-L-L .coms be the next BIG thing ? Or L-L-L .nets ?

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

ama86

Account Closed
Impact
2
Hello all my lovely namepros people on board.

So recently all the L-L-L.coms is gone.

Is there a possibility the next big hit would be L-L-L-L .coms ?
or C-V-C-V .coms ?
or could it be L-L-L .nets ?
or could it be cute pronounceable 5 letter coms ?

:xf.love:
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
pronounceable 5 letter coms are already decent.

I don't know that L-L-L-L.com will ever really be popular unless it's a good dictionary word, and even then would be pushing it in my opinion.
 
0
•••
I'd say 48 chars domain names with a pattern that goes like this:
C-V-N-C-V-N- .... -C-V-N.com
where C is consonant, V vowel and N a number.
There are only 908 billions combinations, supply on demand baby!

- i'm kiddin, the only thing I can see for the (not so near) future are pronunciable 5L.com. imho.
 
0
•••
forget nets, full stop tbh imho

even cvcv.net are only worth low $xx, arent they? apart from odd freak sale

also L-L-L-L is stretching it, again apart from odd great word like P-O-R-N lol, or something.

seen a LOT of LL-LL words taken, quite a lot developed too
 
0
•••
I like 3 letter .nets. I have some(AND 1 N-N-N):

M-P-3 .net c-c-c
G-E-O .net
O-W-N .net
S-O-X .net
C-U-M .net
3-6-0 .net

I believe a premium "word" will def. hold their own (IMO).

good luck all, Gary.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
L-L-L-L.com won't happen. In my opinion there are too many affordable alternatives, L-L-L.com are alternatives to LLL.com, and if for some reason someone would need an L-L-L.com alternative, it wouldn't be L-L-L-L.com.

My view,
Declan.
 
0
•••
buckshotdots said:
I like 3 letter .nets. I have some:

M-p-3.net c-c-c
G-e-o.net
O-w-n.net
S-o-x.net

I believe a premium "word" will def. hold their own (IMO).

good luck all, Gary.

yers, actually, not to contradict my previous post, this is true of prime 3 letter words & prime acronyms

the ones you have are perfect examples.

G-e-o etc awesome

Barring these top keywords & 'key acronyms' (TM) lol, true i think
 
0
•••
l-l-l-l.coms won't be good ever (in nearest 20 years at least)
good 5L.coms will be the next big thing...
 
0
•••
i think that L-L-L-L wont be the next big thing...

LLLLL.com can be a good thing but they must be good ones, such as pronounceable or premium CVCVC (:imho: just these will have or already have some value)
 
0
•••
maybe the L-L-L .nets words...
 
0
•••
Imho l-l-l.coms are the only type of domains exclusively bought by domainers..

Nobody is using them for websites.. (correct me if I am wrong).. I mean who would ever type it in their address bar..

So as I see it .. They are bought by domainers.. To be resold to other domainers, that think they can sell em even higher to yet other domainers..

No end user really wants these.. But since there are getting more and more domainers each day, and we have to buy something, all l-l-l.coms are now taken. Only people that could be happy about this is the registrars...
 
0
•••
promo said:
Imho l-l-l.coms are the only type of domains exclusively bought by domainers..

Nobody is using them for websites.. (correct me if I am wrong).. I mean who would ever type it in their address bar..

So as I see it .. They are bought by domainers.. To be resold to other domainers, that think they can sell em even higher to yet other domainers..

No end user really wants these.. But since there are getting more and more domainers each day, and we have to buy something, all l-l-l.coms are now taken. Only people that could be happy about this is the registrars...

rofl

where you been?

here, try reading this:

http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/358026-examples-developed-l-l-l-coms.html

its only the tip of iceberg what we're discovering too
 
0
•••
promo said:
Imho l-l-l.coms are the only type of domains exclusively bought by domainers..

Nobody is using them for websites.. (correct me if I am wrong).. I mean who would ever type it in their address bar..

So as I see it .. They are bought by domainers.. To be resold to other domainers, that think they can sell em even higher to yet other domainers..

No end user really wants these.. But since there are getting more and more domainers each day, and we have to buy something, all l-l-l.coms are now taken. Only people that could be happy about this is the registrars...
Your wrong try searching namepros before acting next time.

Their is loads of L-L-L.com websites and quarter of them are corporate companies selling thier produtcs/info on thier product.

i really wish people wouldnt say somethink which they havnt even tryed to research.
 
0
•••
Arnie said somethng similar to me in the poll thread, so I did some spot checking, about twenty random L-L-L.coms . The high premiums were seeing a lot of use, middle premiums had some websites on them too (didn't bother to check the bad letters). An artist used his initials. A smallish but national company used the two letter acronym of its name and seemingly, a random third letter. Some Chinese company, who knows what they do. They were not world shakers, some were vanity sites, but yes, L-L-L.coms are being used, much to my surprise. And severely counter to the no-hyphens conventional wisdom.

Without any real data who is to say, but use of L-L-L.coms seems to be on a level with LLLL.coms. And I missed the boat. (I have other good stuff, no wories)
 
1
•••
I like LL-L.com L-LL.com NN-L.com L-NN.com =)
 
0
•••
accentnepal said:
Without any real data who is to say, but use of L-L-L.coms seems to be on a level with LLLL.coms. And I missed the boat. (I have other good stuff, no wories)
Spot on
 
0
•••
accentnepal said:
Arnie said somethng similar to me in the poll thread, so I did some spot checking, about twenty random L-L-L.coms . The high premiums were seeing a lot of use, middle premiums had some websites on them too (didn't bother to check the bad letters). An artist used his initials. A smallish but national company used the two letter acronym of its name and seemingly, a random third letter. Some Chinese company, who knows what they do. They were not world shakers, some were vanity sites, but yes, L-L-L.coms are being used, much to my surprise. And severely counter to the no-hyphens conventional wisdom.

Without any real data who is to say, but use of L-L-L.coms seems to be on a level with LLLL.coms. And I missed the boat. (I have other good stuff, no wories)

thanks for taking time to check out.
have you seen the developed thread also, where we meticulously work through each string of letters, so not to miss each series?
it's pretty amazing stuff

25-50% developed
every string


rep added
 
0
•••
Just purchase the L-L-L-L's right now and save it for years. It'll be worth something in the future.
 
0
•••
L-L-L-L.com ? Now seriously ... better invest in LLLL.com 's. I don't see any value in them unless they are a VERY VERY BIG acronym or keyword.

The dash is hurting, but in the case of LLL's, I see them working because there is a limited supply and multiple companies have them. So those who cannot afford to get the LLL will likely accept the L-L-L.

C-V-C-V 's? Nope. Not in the next 15 years. CVCV.com's are worth much because of their extremely good brandability potential. Is a domain with 3 dashes brandable? Nope.
 
1
•••
alexsimon said:
L-L-L-L.com ? Now seriously ... better invest in LLLL.com 's. I don't see any value in them unless they are a VERY VERY BIG acronym or keyword.

The dash is hurting, but in the case of LLL's, I see them working because there is a limited supply and multiple companies have them. So those who cannot afford to get the LLL will likely accept the L-L-L.

C-V-C-V 's? Nope. Not in the next 15 years. CVCV.com's are worth much because of their extremely good brandability potential. Is a domain with 3 dashes brandable? Nope.
I agree with alex.
 
0
•••
CatchedCatched
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
NameMaxi - Your Domain Has Buyers
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back