Child Porn Domain Names

[markfromslo]

I just saw FreeChildPorn.com on snapnames this morning and it sickened me so that I wrote a quick article about this topic here. I'm interested in your comments.

 

[gazzip]

I'm interested in your comments.

It makes my ******* blood boil :yell: - nameing and shaming would be the "polite" thing to do to them but I suspect some would say it would be against their "Human rights". Like they deserve any ?


.

 

[bobdigital]

I consider it immoral, but is sex with minors illegal in countries other than the US?

 

[scandiman]

It makes my ******* blood boil :yell: - nameing and shaming would be the "polite" thing to do to them but I suspect some would say it would be against their "Human rights". Like they deserve any ?

Human rights are reserved for humans only.

I wonder if a name like this could be used to track IP addresses of perps.

 

[Spade]

I wouldnt be suprised to see Snap Pull this name.

 

[gazzip]

Human rights are reserved for humans only.
.

One would have thought so !


.

 

[TheBaldOne]

BobDigital, the answer to your question is YES, it is generally illegal around the world, although age of consent may differ.

This name should be immediately pulled and either handed over to the registry not to be allowed the light of day again.

By the way, stuff their Human Rights, what about the kids HUMAN RIGHTS to grow up without being abused.

 

[gazzip]

By the way, stuff their Human Rights, what about the kids HUMAN RIGHTS to grow up without being abused.

Please do not take what I said in the wrong way

I was trying to say that THEY DO NOT DESERVE ANY HUMAN RIGHTS

- But unfortunately some people say otherwise and it would probably be illegal to name and shame them, I do know it is illegal in the UK to print their address in newspapers etc. This is something people here want to change for obvious reasons.

Please read what I said again and if its not crystal clear then ask me.


.

 

[HBK216]

I am in no way defending child porn as I think it is wrong!

However depending on the location, wouldn't the age of consent in certain places imply to many that they are still children because they are not of legal adult age yet?

In the end though, even with that possible counterpoint, it is pretty obvious visitors will go there hoping to find children below the legal consenting age.

I don't think taking a name away for good is fair as many illegal things have their own domain & that will start a whole mess on what is legal & what is not. I would like to see the name used as a way to track pedophiles.

Maybe they sign up for content thinking it is real content & the info gets passed to authorities instead. A name like this would lure in many I bet.

 

[gazzip]

Maybe they sign up for content thinking it is real content & the info gets passed to authorities instead. A name like this would lure in many I bet.

This part is a great idea IMO - I would bet they would catch quiet a few for sure.


.

 

[markfromslo]

Child porn is often with children 4-5 years old. No way it would be legal in any country. If it is, we need to just nuke that country because they don't deserve to exist.

 

[Optinom]

Its not just about legal/illegal.. pedo abuse exists,and continues despite this.

This is really sick. Sometimes I get pedo abuse reports on my server and I wonder why the hell on earth ppl do this.. after-all for little money. People indulging in these should be caught & have their private-organs removed. Only then people wont go to such extents for money..

 

[scandiman]

I would like to see the name used as a way to track pedophiles.

Maybe they sign up for content thinking it is real content & the info gets passed to authorities instead. A name like this would lure in many I bet.

Anything to take more of these perps off the streets would be great!

 

[TheBaldOne]

Hi Gazzup,

Sorry, just skimmed the posts, my mistake intirely. Living in the UK we are used to 'everyone' being given these rights except for the poor victims of these people (I only class them as people biologically).

I also think a 'sting' operation is the perfect use for such a name.

Removal of anatomical parts would be a superb solution, the rate of abuse would decline tremendously.

 

[tetrapak]

Imho this is exxegerated. Why? Because you go to Cambodia and there are underage prostutitues who are being exploited by mostly British but many other nationalities as well, we are talking about thousands of incidents a day. What is a domain or even a photo on a website compared to this? Nothing.

My blood boils when a teacher gets 200 years of jail for having 10 "pedo photos" on his computer (the name suggests they are but who knows what is it), on the other hand those people that travel to third world countries with huge budgets just to exploit underage individuals do not get anything. And another thing that you should keep in mind, this country that gives 200 years for owning some photos (which doesnt harm anyone), the average age of losing virginity is 12. Weird laws, weird thinking, weird world.

 

[Broker]

Should be an illegal domain period and snapnames should be ashamed. Looks like they got hacked anyway

 

[slaughterbeck]

It’s needless to write about how disgusted this domain name makes me. There’s simply no justification for its existence other than to promote the nauseating tendencies of those who would exploit young and defenseless children. As the mother of a little girl I feel the responsibility to do something about this.

 

[angisson]

Child porn is often with children 4-5 years old. No way it would be legal in any country. If it is, we need to just nuke that country because they don't deserve to exist.

I don't think thats right, from what reports show its of all ages not just 1 age. but usally older from what reports have showed.

Thats a good idea to use it to catch people like that but I'm sure it will catch on fast.

about the age of consent, in different places in the world are different, like Zimbabwe, Mexico, Panama, Philippines (and etc.) are as low as 12 (years old) but with some causes. (source: here)

I think the domain was wrong but its just like the KKK domain that was sold awhile ago, people just do it too make a buck, I can almost bet a org. will take it.. just as they have done in the past with other domains.

 

[slaughterbeck]

I think the domain was wrong but its just like the KKK domain that was sold awhile ago, people just do it too make a buck, I can almost bet a org. will take it.. just as they have done in the past with other domains.

The KKK is deplorable and has been responsible for thousands of ghastly crimes. However, they can, and do argue that their existence supports a form of free speech, the same as many other hate groups in existence; there is absolutely nothing regarding “Free Child Porn” which could ever possibly argue the same.

 

[MinionDH]

This name should be immediately pulled and either handed over to the registry not to be allowed the light of day again.

This would be good, but I'm not sure they would do this.. but here's another idea:

The NAACP registered the "N" word in most major extensions. Maybe some organization should do the same with these types of names.