Oh, really? No idea? And we need you to enlighten us with your arrogant and holier-than-thou condescension? No thanks.
I understand, no offense taken. But I can't stand the opposite, that is the populists who insult your intelligence, drag the conversation down and spread lies. Especially when the stakes are so high. Making promises like Johnson or Farage have is easy, but I'd like to know they are going to fulfill them ?
Farage is already backtracking on his BTW, and Johnson has said the UK will divert monetary contributions to Brussels to the NHS, as if NHS wasn't a failure too.
The majority of people in the UK have voted to reclaim their sovereignty, dignity and democracy.
Democracy the British way, you mean RIPA, the snoopers charter and all that stuff (that has been going on for a long time). It's not my idea of dignity and democracy. Even the EU is not pushing for such draconian measures. (Sometimes the EU acts as a safeguard too, but admittedly it's not working anymore with Hungary etc).
This idea is spreading not just in Europe but everywhere. This is the beginning of the universal revolt against globalism, regulation and centralisation and for independence, peace and prosperity.
What I see is a return to the old Europe of the 30s. Small nations driven by nationalism, competing against each other, and eventually waging war against each other because they are incapable of getting along.
Where will the newly-found prosperity come from ? I thought the EU was your main trading partner... To continue to enjoy free trade like the other non-member countries, you'll still have to implement a good chunk of EU law into your own legislation, and play by EU rules (but this time without the opportunity the shape them). It's catch-22.
This
exposรฉ (from a mildly pro-EU think tank) puts it like this:
If Britain were to leave the EU, it would face a difficult dilemma: having to negotiate access to the
EUโs single market in exchange for continued adherence to its rules โ or losing access in return for
regulatory sovereignty that would be largely illusory.
Some interesting points are made. The level of discussion is certainly more thorough than what we have seen throughout the campaign, and it doesn't even address all the stakes, just the economy.
I remember when Soros bet against the Pound in 1992 and he won, forcing the Pound out of the EMS. I realized back then that since the UK couldn't even control its own currency, it was not sovereign... it's hubris. Nations are less powerful than Global Finance. In today's world, the UK is not that strong. No European country is influential alone on the global stage.
But the big unstated reason for the Leave was anti-immigrant sentiment and the fear of immigration in general.
Since the UK already controls its own borders and does not adhere to to the free movement of persons - how leaving the EU is going to change things ?
PS: sorry for the long post.