NameSilo

sales Brandable Daily Sales Analysis

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Dnbolt

Top Member
Impact
738
Started a series called Brandable Daily Sales Analysis and would like to share some useful discoveries.
Lets now dive in.

First would be Fitalytics (dot) com

Note the following.

Registration Date: 2010-06-02

Month of Sale: 2016-05

Domain Length: 10 Characters

Domain History:
brandbucket-domains.png


As you can see the current nameserver from the image suggests that the domain was recently added to brandbucket marketplace. Also that the domain was first registered back in 2008 although the current registration date is 2010-06-02 We can also see that it’s very likely that the domain has changed hands prior its sale on brandbucket.

Other Extensions : 1 other extensions has been taken

Google Popularity: On Google first page results it has 9 similar mentions excluding where domain is brandbucket. The most interesting part is that the name “Fitalytic” was mentioned on CrunchBase. We can conclude that it’s Google Popularity is strong.

Social Handles: It’sTwitter has been taking since 2012. The Facebook handle has also been taken.

Dictionary Keywords: Fit, and Italy.

Brandbucket Sold Keyword: Aly Example of sold domain that contain such keyword dailydealy.com .

Other Keywords: Taly, Alytic, Aly

Similar End User Domain currently in use: talytics.com This simply suggests some trends from the word Alytic.

Read More
 
Last edited:
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
0
•••
26 x 26 x 26 x 26 x 26 - I think this wrong because your including a-zzzzz I know this because I used it for something..

Past days I've been thinking 26^5 - 26^4 -26^3 - 26^2 -26 -2 ?

Maybe I am asking on the wrong forum?

Sure, I can easily know the most popular :xf.wink:. But need to know total for ranking purpose.

That's sort of what I was trying to explain above. If you are only looking for pronounceable patterns that eliminates several. Then is there a threshold for how often a pattern can actually make a word that is pleasing to the human eye before you count a pattern? This will skew the numbers as it is subjective. I don't think you can do this strictly as a math formula or you will always include or exclude possible scenarios.

I believe you would need to identify the patterns you consider acceptable and then doing the math on those to come to your total figure.

I arrived at 32 possible patterns just by the true possible patterns available in a 5L. 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2.
This does not take in to account the pronounce-ability of the pattern, only it's existence.
 
1
•••
To add: I think you are trying to make a math formula for something only the human eye can identify easily.

If I understand correctly you want to calculate the total number of possible pronounceable domains in a 5L? Either that or you want all possible patterns that can produce a pronounceable word?

A math formula can not account for things such as "i before e except after c" or "st" and "sh" are pronounceable (as in the CC in a pattern) but "mz" is not.

That is why I feel you could only extrapolate an estimated total. The method you choose to go about this would be entirely up to you.
 
0
•••
To add: I think you are trying to make a math formula for something only the human eye can identify easily.

If I understand correctly you want to calculate the total number of possible pronounceable domains in a 5L? Either that or you want all possible patterns that can produce a pronounceable word?

A math formula can not account for things such as "i before e except after c" or "st" and "sh" are pronounceable (as in the CC in a pattern) but "mz" is not.

That is why I feel you could only extrapolate an estimated total. The method you choose to go about this would be entirely up to you.

Nope, not trying to detect pronounceable but a way to easily detect junks. No need to reinvent the wheels when many specialised brandable sites has already done most of the heavy weight lifting for me. But cannot completely rely on them because of high percentage of junks.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
That's sort of what I was trying to explain above. If you are only looking for pronounceable patterns that eliminates several. Then is there a threshold for how often a pattern can actually make a word that is pleasing to the human eye before you count a pattern? This will skew the numbers as it is subjective. I don't think you can do this strictly as a math formula or you will always include or exclude possible scenarios.

I believe you would need to identify the patterns you consider acceptable and then doing the math on those to come to your total figure.

I arrived at 32 possible patterns just by the true possible patterns available in a 5L. 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2.
This does not take in to account the pronounce-ability of the pattern, only it's existence.

Thanks for your valuable feedback. Will ponder upon it until I fall asleep, and also back to drawing board.
 
0
•••
datezy/com =>$4,075
datesy/com =>$6,500

why was the "sy" version more cost? Also it looks the buyer bought both versions from 2 different owners and set both whois to private. Slight spike in "sy" names, let's see if it's just a temporary one.
 
0
•••
i was an early user there, my sell through rate was 20% - now less than 1%
 
Last edited:
1
•••
datezy/com =>$4,075
datesy/com =>$6,500

why was the "sy" version more cost? Also it looks the buyer bought both versions from 2 different owners and set both whois to private. Slight spike in "sy" names, let's see if it's just a temporary one.

really?! - because 'dates' is a word not 'datez'
 
0
•••
0
•••
no, the 'y' makes a word brandable,
 
0
•••
Dnbolt, do you have some lists with brandables sold on namebio, like most used dictionary words or registration dates for the brandables listed at namebio?

Also, as of now "free" is one of the hottest keyword in namebio sales data but NOT in brandables and startups.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
really?! - because 'dates' is a word not 'datez'

Maybe someone took it for the word date ( calendar ) instead of dating...weird though.
 
0
•••
Lovingly/com =>$28,000

Other names sold on bb that ends with ingly:

slingly/com =>$1,950
imagingly/com=> $1,795
meetingly/com => $2,145
cookingly/com

namebio has only 10

(not so lucrative)
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Lovingly/com =>$28,000

Other names sold on bb that ends with ingly:

slingly/com =>$1,950
imagingly/com=> $1,795
meetingly/com => $2,145
cookingly/com

namebio has only 10

(not so lucrative)
Lovingly is a real word and that's why it sold for a good price. The others are all random words with ly added to them.
 
4
•••
What is the sell through rate of brandables, ball park, 1%??? 1% is industry average for non brandables .com.
 
0
•••
What is the sell through rate of brandables, ball park, 1%??? 1% is industry average for non brandables .com.

I believe BrandBucket's sell-through rate is currently around 2.7% annually.
 
1
•••
284 sales recorded by DnBolt during the three months from November '16 thru January '17

Multiply that by 4 to get an annual estimate = 1,136 = the numerator

Average inventory over those 3 months of 42,838 = the denominator

1,136 / 42,838 = 2.7%
 
6
•••
My lifetime annualized rate at BrandBucket is 2.8%. Over the past year, it's 2.3%.
 
3
•••
Good brandables sell through rate 2-4%

Crap brandables less than 1% (maybe never)
 
1
•••
284 sales recorded by DnBolt during the three months from November '16 thru January '17

Multiply that by 4 to get an annual estimate = 1,136 = the numerator

Average inventory over those 3 months of 42,838 = the denominator

1,136 / 42,838 = 2.7%

Please could I get a copy for review?
 
0
•••
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Catchy
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back