sales Brandable Daily Sales Analysis

[Dnbolt]

Started a series called Brandable Daily Sales Analysis and would like to share some useful discoveries.
Lets now dive in.

First would be Fitalytics (dot) com

Note the following.

Registration Date: 2010-06-02

Month of Sale: 2016-05

Domain Length: 10 Characters

Domain History:

As you can see the current nameserver from the image suggests that the domain was recently added to brandbucket marketplace. Also that the domain was first registered back in 2008 although the current registration date is 2010-06-02 We can also see that it’s very likely that the domain has changed hands prior its sale on brandbucket.

Other Extensions : 1 other extensions has been taken

Google Popularity: On Google first page results it has 9 similar mentions excluding where domain is brandbucket. The most interesting part is that the name “Fitalytic” was mentioned on CrunchBase. We can conclude that it’s Google Popularity is strong.

Social Handles: It’sTwitter has been taking since 2012. The Facebook handle has also been taken.

Dictionary Keywords: Fit, and Italy.

Brandbucket Sold Keyword: Aly Example of sold domain that contain such keyword dailydealy.com .

Other Keywords: Taly, Alytic, Aly

Similar End User Domain currently in use: talytics.com This simply suggests some trends from the word Alytic.

Read More

 

[Justin Matmor]

Show attachment 38183


These are featured listings since 3 or 4 days. I requested them to make my domain Beamza.com as featured. They didnt. I give up.

Do you know how to get featured?

in what basis they selected these as featured domains ?

They feature randomly.

 

[BrandZen]

The only person who is guaranteed to sell any/a bunch of names every month is the person who never gets any of his names rejected (even some not so good ones) and pays no listing fees .

I'm not protecting He-who-must-not-be-named but what's your proof of this?

 

[DNGear]

They were saying they select randomly.
But how come they featured some 5 or 6 domains of a same person in the featured section?

 

[disaac81]

It's just frustrating for me, and I admit, that is why I post my past comments.

If I wanted to build a solid size portfolio, BB is not letting me. Not because my names are rubbish, because I feel they are approving names based on the user, and not the name itself.

The issue of the person we shall not name is still on going and it is clear BB will never address it. So for all of us here, we are at a disadvantage, however hard we try. It is nearly obvious that they do not go through the same process we all do.

I am still positive, but I really do not know what to expect anymore when it comes to BB rejections. For the number one marketplace they should make sure their reviewers know what they are doing and are not biased.

 

[arslan riaz]

3 month ago not sale anything just looking 1st buyer..








..................................................................................................................................
Walletzip.com | CusTomers.ws | ComanyCustomer.com | Sellz.net | AdditionalTv.com | Brandz.us | InsuranceAdd.com | InsuranceMod.com | EyeT.org | Vezat.com | Youv.org
Make Offer pm

 

[Candace]

@Justin Matmor
1. It'll do you well to have an attitude where you win friends and influence people. If you've never read the book, try looking it up. Enjoy it!
2. Did you get that first BB sale yet? You don't have to answer, but your continued strong defense of the platform makes me wonder. Maybe you did get that sale, or maybe you're still defending a platform on which you still have no sales.....hmmmmm?????

@L2 Media
1. Between some of the articles I've read, and a private webinar that I was able to sit in on from Krell where he discussed his investments and his profit, I deduced that he didn't pay the listing fee.
2. However, since that was a deduction on my part, I just sent him an email where I asked if he did. I've emailed him before (multiple times) and he was polite enough to answer. So we'll see.

 

[Justin Matmor]

It's just frustrating for me, and I admit, that is why I post my past comments.

If I wanted to build a solid size portfolio, BB is not letting me. Not because my names are rubbish, because I feel they are approving names based on the user, and not the name itself.

The issue of the person we shall not name is still on going and it is clear BB will never address it. So for all of us here, we are at a disadvantage, however hard we try. It is nearly obvious that they do not go through the same process we all do.

I am still positive, but I really do not know what to expect anymore when it comes to BB rejections. For the number one marketplace they should make sure their reviewers know what they are doing and are not biased.

BB is running a business. They will only list names they think will sell. If you get a rejection it is because they think your name will not sell. Pure and simple.

 

[DNGear]

BB is running a business. They will only list names they think will sell. If you het a rejection it is because they think your name will not sell. Pure and simple.

Lol...So all the selected names would sell?

 

[Justin Matmor]

Lol...So all the selected names would sell?

They reject names for a reason. They're entitled to reject rubbish names.

 

[DNGear]

They reject names for a reason. They're entitled to reject rubbish names.

I guess they accept names for a reason.

 

[Justin Matmor]

@Justin Matmor
1. It'll do you well to have an attitude where you win friends and influence people. If you've never read the book, try looking it up. Enjoy it!
2. Did you get that first BB sale yet? You don't have to answer, but your continued strong defense of the platform makes me wonder. Maybe you did get that sale, or maybe you're still defending a platform on which you still have no sales.....hmmmmm?????

@L2 Media
1. Between some of the articles I've read, and a private webinar that I was able to sit in on from Krell where he discussed his investments and his profit, I deduced that he didn't pay the listing fee.
2. However, since that was a deduction on my part, I just sent him an email where I asked if he did. I've emailed him before (multiple times) and he was polite enough to answer. So we'll see.

If I was the MD and someone accused me of not paying listing fees, I would be insulted.

 

[BrandZen]

1. Between some of the articles I've read, and a private webinar that I was able to sit in on from Krell where he discussed his investments and his profit, I deduced that he didn't pay the listing fee.
2. However, since that was a deduction on my part, I just sent him an email where I asked if he did. I've emailed him before where he was polite enough to answer. So we'll see.

I've asked for discounts on listing fees and was offered an additional discount for purchasing 1000 credits at a time. An additional discount would have been offered for purchasing more. I'm sure Lord Voldemort gets a steep discount.

 

[disaac81]

They reject names for a reason. They're entitled to reject rubbish names.

So tell me....which one of my names was rubbish?

 

[Justin Matmor]

So tell me....which one of my names was rubbish?

Sorry but I am not familiar with your reject list.

 

[disaac81]

I've asked for discounts on listing fees and was offered an additional discount for purchasing 1000 credits at a time. An additional discount would have been offered for purchasing more. I'm sure Lord Voldemort gets a steep discount for all the names he's listed.

With the number of names he sells every month on BB he must be a millionaire by now. I still remember his post when he said he will give BB a try. I suppose in life we have luck too, and he certainly found his golden ticket.

 

[BrandZen]

They were saying they select randomly.
But how come they featured some 5 or 6 domains of a same person in the featured section?

Show attachment 38187


Show attachment 38188

I do think its random. I've had many of my names featured. Below is a screen shot I just took and 4 out of 10 names below are mine. I can promise you I don't have any more affiliation with BB then you do. The more names you list the more chances of your name being featured - I think

 

[Candace]

I do think its random. I've had many of my names featured. Below is a screen shot I just took and 4 out of 10 names below are mine. I can promise you I don't have any more affiliation with BB then you do. The more names you list the more chances of your name being featured - I think

Show attachment 38196

Actually, it's not that random. I think it's names that get an A+ brandability rating by the branding team (rating given on the landing page. Might be some A rated ones as well, not sure). At least, that's what it's been for me. What were the ratings for the names that you have featured?

 

[BrandZen]

Actually, it's not that random. I think it's names that get an A+ brandability rating by the branding team (rating given on the landing page). At least, that's what it's been for me. What were the ratings for the names that you have featured?

A, A+, A+, A+
Fundnomi/c, credov/o, credov/a, premite/x

 

[Michael M]

If I recall correctly they used to be called "Staff Picks" a while back... So I would imagine that the staff picks which ones are featured - or at the least there is an algorithm in play.

I have had some names featured and some names not. Generally I can agree that my names that are featured are better than the ones that weren't.

I personally have no knowledge of rather anyone gets free listings at BB or not, but in all honesty - if you ran a brandable marketplace would you charge yourself to list on it? I mean honestly, pretty much everyone will answer that (even if under their breath) with an "of course not".

Would this bring into question ethics? Possibly, but the root of the ethic question would be if you would allow employees to list names on the marketplace. But in the particular case you are referring he was hired because he was such a good seller. So I couldn't imgaine it would be reasonable to ask him to step away from listing on the platform.

The only way you would be able to have a 100% unbiased brandable marketplace is if it is ran by a team who do not own any of the inventory... But that would be a very odd thing as the only people interested in building a brandable marketplace would be domainers. (or marketers - but that is a blurry line where the marketers are of course into domaining as well)

Basically it comes down to BB opened up the flood gates on new sellers and domains, which in turn is going to open the flood gates on people who feel mistreated for one reason or another. IMO BB has no real good way to respond to the recent criticisms as it will continue to come at them no matter what they say.

The best thing BB can do is continue to sell names, and to work hard at keeping their sale through rate up as the inventory rises. This will keep the majority of sellers happy. Past that I do not believe they have any responsibility to appease every seller that has a domain with them. That is an impossible task when you consider that everyone here on NP has their own personal interest in mind, a keyboard, and time to spend blasting everything they consider unfair.

On the other side of the coin you have blind BB supporters who drank too much koolaide, foaming at the mouth like a rabbid retarded pit bull - quick to personally attack anyone who has anything to say, even when it is constructive critism. This, I believe, just further fans the flames of any discontent and damages chances of a productive conversation.

None-the-less everybody just needs to calm down... Decide if a partnership with BB is in their best interest, and make business decisions based off of reality and math - and not from emotion or conspiracy theories.

Just my $0.02 ...

 

[hookbox]

Actually, it's not that random. I think it's names that get an A+ brandability rating by the branding team (rating given on the landing page. Might be some A rated ones as well, not sure). At least, that's what it's been for me. What were the ratings for the names that you have featured?

Oqora has a brandability rating of B+ but it's owned by Keith Deboer so I guess that's why it's featured. Those insiders get all the perks!