NameSilo

Big companies not loving the new gTLD extensions proposal

Spacemail by SpaceshipSpacemail by Spaceship
Watch

equity78

Top Member
:heavy_check_mark: TheDomains.com
:heavy_check_mark: TLDInvestors.com
Impact
32,415
The Wall Street Journal is reporting several major companies are protesting the new gTLD extensions.

Verizon Communications, Marriott International and New York Life Insurance are among the companies arguing that the new domain extensions could open the flood gates to Internet fraud and drastically increase their costs of doing business online.

“Companies are in a difficult position. In one sense, they may feel compelled to register their crown jewels in all these locations because if they don’t, an infringer will come along, and you will have to deal with the consequences. But at the same time, it’s a huge waste of corporate resources,” says Sarah Deutsch, vice president and associate general counsel at Verizon.

The Journal reports that companies are debating whether they should buy up the rights to operate their own brand-specific domains, such as .marriott or .nylife and looking at registering their trademarks for more generic domains. For example, Marriott is considering acquiring the rights to Marriott.nyc, Marriott.travel or Marriott.vacations.

“”"The bigger issue for companies probably would be more-generic domains like .bank, which could attract interest from multiple parties and spark bidding wars.

The companies that end up operating such domains are expected to offer trademark owners the chance to register their trademarks early for about $500 per domain, about 10 times as much as the price to the public.”"”"

A typical company might register 20 sites within each new top-level domain, making the total cost to participate in all 200 of them $2 million, says Josh Bourne, managing partner of FairWinds Partners, an Internet-strategy consulting firm and a member of CADNA

According to the Journal, industry executives say consumers are likely to stick with .com’s, so they expect the new domains to have little business purpose.

“”"”Web surfers are more apt to continuing visiting sites with the standard .com suffix, such as NYLife.com, instead of visiting a Web site with the address customerservice.nylife, says New York LIfe’s Mr. Hittel.”"”

“It is difficult enough to get consumers to visit any domain name that doesn’t end with .com,” he says.

The Journal points out that companies have been through this before, with the launch of such domain extensions like .asia or .eu. They bought up hundreds of thousands of domains pre-emptively but say these sites either sit dormant or fail to generate traffic.

Credit goes to www.thedomains.com
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
.US domains.US domains
Thanks for sharing Equity. It still amazes me ICANN is going through with this... (out of how obviously stupid this is from a cybersquatting perspective)

What's stopping any .cybersquatter from forking out $185k and squatting an entire extension worth of trademarks? There's no way they're going to be able to control it... Extensions open up to the general public -- are companies expected to buy all those extensions too or risk members of the general public buying domains like ihatemicrosoft.software?

I wonder if more money will be made from releasing new extensions or from handling trademark disputes which arise courtesy of them :|
 
0
•••
I agree with the larger companies on this.... It makes no sence to have these new domains... It is, as they say, hard to get consumers to visit the non .com's as it is.... This is just forcing companies to register their brands, and for many companies, if they do this, they have to claim plurals, non plurals, and popular abbreviations - what a mess.... Just a money maker for ICANN...
 
0
•••
Probably the latter Reece ... Every time a new extension is released , Every entity/company out there Big or Small has just that much more to worry about when it comes to Brand Protection. Enough is enough IMO - But of course most potential investors in these new extensions think it's just the "Old .com Guard" being jealous or scared when something negative is said. I could see a few GTLD's and CCTLD's as necessary to keep the peace , But the market/web is now saturated with extensions.

BTW - http://www.domaining.com/news/2008/11/04/ Seems to me Verizon is about to liquidate a large portion of their online assets ;)
 
0
•••
I have read the official ICANN PDF file texts. You need $150,000 as a submission fee among a few others. But that does not mean anyone who can fork out the dough will be entitled to a TLD. ICANN will only honor submissions by companies of good standing. Individuals and sole proprietorships will not be considered according to ICANN.
 
0
•••
Good companies can go bad just like any other company.. Many domainers own their own company and are already planning to apply for extensions.

See: http://www.thedomains.com/2008/11/04/wsj-companies-are-protesting-new-domain-extensions/ (article cited by Equity)

and: http://www.thedomains.com/2008/10/28/rules-for-new-domain-extensions-announced-gtlds/

Some of the comments posted by others are also worth reading.

.h2o. said:
I have read the official ICANN PDF file texts. You need $150,000 as a submission fee among a few others. But that does not mean anyone who can fork out the dough will be entitled to a TLD. ICANN will only honor submissions by companies of good standing. Individuals and sole proprietorships will not be considered according to ICANN.
 
0
•••
Dumb idea more driven by greed than need IMHO, good for the lawyers though :$: :$: :$: :$: :$:



.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back