You're not comparing the same thing.You say that third party platforms have sold thousands of such like domains.
The Newbie in me compares that to tens of millions of similar transactions at GD and I know what I put more faith into.
Thankfully - there seems to be a better understanding of these bots than I thought here at NPs
52 votes for ZERO Value, (at this timestamp)
My confidence in the membership is restored - shame though that all the advocates of the Appraisal services are the most vocal in the threads
You're not comparing the same thing.
Brandable name third party sites set prices on the names they sell, and people agree to pay them.
The GD appraisal bot does not sell the names it prices.
I think you need to clarify what you mean by GD's "transactions" in this comparison.
I believe we're now getting away from discussing the value of a number assigned by an appraisal bot.I think that what I was referring to was the GD which shows you 'More comparable domains sold'. This is using actual and factual data I presume.
In the original question it states...'As a buyer etc....' and I was thinking as an end user buyer rather than as a domain investor. There is the real world and then there is domain investing.
I saw yesterday that on one of the 3rd party sites there was a domain for sale for $3,000 and the GD appraised value was for less than $100. At least it was a .com.
I don't think I would ever buy a domain from this forum again as the prices seem to keep going up irrespective of a worldwide crisis. Everyone needs to knock some zeros off their prices in my opinion.
Still, what do I know huh?
Agree to disagree again.
Moving on......
Absolutely agree. This poll only addresses the value assigned by the tool.There is a bunch of information gathered to appraise a name that is the information your looking at not the price do not dismiss every tool as useless you might just find how often it is searched for or similar names sales history.
Exactly but wanted to let people know what there is probability in the math even if the end result isn't accurate.Absolutely agree. This poll only addresses the value assigned by the tool.
I really think some sort of rating system will be a more efficient component of appraisal tools. I have been considering creating a database of all registered domains that allows visitors to rank domains on a scale of 1-10. Price ranges will be estimated based on the overall domain score.
I think what you're missing is that, in general, successful domain investors do not benefit from appraisal tools.The irony of this thread is that although overwhelmingly obvious that many experienced and badged domain investors have shot down automated appraisals not many, if any of them has come up with a tangible alternative and continue to over price their domain names.
I see the challenges you've outlined and I appreciate the wisdom in it. With that said, I will also argue that the amount of work a domain owner puts into promoting and branding a domain name adds to its value, however 'unscrupulous' the tactics employed may be. It will get more endusers involved in the process of appraising domain names. After all, they ultimately determine the commercial viability of a domain name.Good evening,
It is a nice idea as something is definitely needed and quick.
However, it will never work as for example if I have domain name that I want to be more highly rated I will get my family and friends to over inflate the scores. Obviously, the bigger the family the higher the scores.
Down the line it will then be possible to just buy random scores from unscrupulous dealers similar to likes on social media.
The irony of this thread is that although overwhelmingly obvious that many experienced and badged domain investors have shot down automated appraisals not many, if any of them has come up with a tangible alternative and continue to over price their domain names.
The world has changed and will keep turning so I guess I will have to just flip a coin to decide on values.
Regards,
Reddstagg
I think what you're missing is that, in general, successful domain investors do not benefit from appraisal tools.
If it was so easy to know exactly what a name is worth, and as a result to have all buyers agree to pay that amount without question, then anyone could do this. What's more, there would be no aftermarket.
Since you say you have a good handle on this business, this is one that you should be able to answer.I guess my point is this. Why don't we know how much a domain is worth? Why cannot all the smart people here from business, finance, maths or science backgrounds, or indeed from any background, race, creed, religion or socio-economic standing come up with something that we can all agree on.
They are commodities. In addition, they are both assets and liabilities. They are brands. They are property. They are trademarks. They are advertisements. And you can never actually own them!These were and continue to be traded as commodities like gold, silver, cadmium or oil.
It's quite the dichotomy, don't you think...? On one hand you want to re-invent the industry, but on the other hand you wonder why there isn't a better robot out there to do the hard work for you.It has taken me just one year to get a good handle on domain investing as a business and people are afraid in case the likes of me learn all the secrets and begin to turn the business on its head.
Lots of interesting discussion points there, but I'll try to focus on a couple.
Since you say you have a good handle on this business, this is one that you should be able to answer.
The reason is that the domain aftermarket is not regulated. Nothing is stopping anyone from asking whatever price they want for a name. And nothing is stopping a buyer from paying $40K for a name most others would only spend $500 to own. How can a value be computed for something like that?
To make matters worse, every name is unique. Names you think should have similar value often don't, and it likely comes down to no more than:
I actually think professional athletes make a great comparison for this purpose. Does it bother you that some athletes make $20+ million dollars per year for no other reason except that there are wealthy teams who will pay that amount just to be the best?
- the seller's experience and patience; and
- the buyer's resources and personal tastes
They are commodities. In addition, they are both assets and liabilities. They are brands. They are property. They are trademarks. They are advertisements. And you can never actually own them!
Nothing in the world is like a domain name. So many factors go into determining the value of any single name for any possible buyer... How could an automated tool ever account for all of it?
It's quite the dichotomy, don't you think...? On one hand you want to re-invent the industry, but on the other hand you wonder why there isn't a better robot out there to do the hard work for you.
How will increased regulation will help domain investors who are already profitable?Good morning and thank you for your reply.
So basically, you are saying that it is impossible to value a domain name as there are too many un-quantifiable parameters and the aftermarket cannot be regulated.
I don't care what people earn by the way and as we are individuals rather than teams or corporations I cannot comment on other situations. Any athlete, footballer or popstar has paid their dues over the years and deserve their payday. Their chosen fields are heavily regulated too.
I look more to the motor insurance industry where there too there are many un-quantifiable parameters at play. The only difference between the two industries is they have top level Actuarial teams who have quantified everything and from those calculations they are able to determine values, costs and everything in between and this is why we are able to get comparable quotes for motor insurance.
The seemingly impossible was made possible by getting the best people for the job, allocating a sufficient budget and by introducing regulation.
It can and should be done , it's just that as an industry we choose not to and pore scorn on any system which attempts to do so without suggesting a better alternative.
My question is this. Why aren't we as an industry crying out for regulation as in the long run it can help all of us?
We call ourselves professional, business people and yet we want to ride around like it is the WWW...Wild Wild West.
Every other type of commodity is regulated and has benchmark figures for buying and trading so it is not too far a stretch of the imagination to assume that the same cannot be done for domain investing.
Maybe those who are so against the idea are the ones who have the most to lose or hide. Maybe they will not be able to continue to act in a regulated industry.
I see it as a good idea and I think that it will make the industry more professional, more controlled and more transparent.
Only time will tell, but it is coming and I for one have no reason to not embrace it as I have everything to gain and nothing to hide.
Again, I think we shall just have to agree to disagree.
Regards,
Reddstagg
Are we agreeing to disagree or discussing? You seem to be doing both. But yes, feel free to move on after my response.Good afternoon,
I worked in many different areas of the UK Insurance industry prior to and after the introduction of 'The Financial Services Act 1986' and can assure you that this specific piece of regulation helped every facet of the industry, whether that be Insurance Companies, Financial Advisors, Administration Staff, Brokers, Direct Insurance Companies, Regulatory Bodies, Law Companies, Estate Planners, Accountants and most importantly of all, the General Public.
In my honest opinion the industry was a better place to be after the introduction of this act and everything is more transparent, professional, honest, straightforward, less complicated and better regulated. It is definitely a win-win situation for everybody concerned.
Domain investing as a business makes people money. I can't deny that and wish everyone continued good luck as they move forward.
However, what I object to is making money from those who can ill afford to lose it in the first place or who have been told blatant lies, deliberately mis-informed or mis-directed or even manipulated and although this applies to many businesses we are only concerned with one.
Again, I state that if we want to be seen as honest, ethical professionals we need to be beyond reproach and above suspicion and we can only achieve this through either self-regulation or direct regulation.
If we cannot agree between ourselves on a methodology of determining prices then if we are not careful, we will be told to use one that we do not trust or have faith in.
There are subtle, minor changes that are occurring on both sides of the business and this may just be the first steps towards clarity and regulation.
If your house is not in order, now is the time to make the changes before it is too late.
There have been many people throughout history who have made money but that doesn't mean we should worship them, aspire to be like them or let history paint them as without sins.
My conscious is clear and I have nothing to hide and as I have not made any sales I don't have any cash to bury in the back yard. It happens.
For now, we should agree to disagree and move on.
Regards,
Reddstagg