Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

An Epik Statement on Racism and Injustice

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rob Monster

Founder of EpikTop Member
:heavy_check_mark: Epik Founder
Impact
18,367
upload_2020-6-12_10-14-29.png

Archived copy here: https://www.epik.com/equality
 
45
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Soviet Union was number 1 in space tech, and Kennedy (who is a good guy) said we will go to the Moon first. But he was killed for other reason (trying to eliminate deepstate control).. Anyway maybe space race would be bad both for Soviets and US, and I suspect they made a deal, US would create fake moon landing movies, and Soviets wouldn't make any objection, and this way space-race would slow down. Part of this story is my invention, but it makes a lot of sense. Most people on Apollo program didn't even know what the hell they were doing. Maybe they were building undreground cities. Anyway, I'm sure Apollo Moon landings are totally fake. They are movies by Kubrick (another good guy), and he hinted that it was all fake , in other movies, for example in Shining there is a sentence "A11 work and no joy makes Jack a dull boy".



the last I heard was that a CIA man at the back seat row
within Kennedys Car
accidentally shoot Mr Kennedy
while he was nervously trying to kill Oswald


if that's true:
if I would have been in charge at the CIA
I would have tried to cover that well, too
 
Last edited:
0
•••
before you think this is all off topic

no, it isn't

because that's what has been Epik specialty
for quite a while
talking about all crazy *hit

may it be likely or not
the more unlikely
even the better

as that gives traffic
and traffic at namepros
is good for epiks promotion at namepros

.. just in case you are not aware....
 
1
•••
It is hard to have a serious discussion with someone who thinks the Moon landing was a hoax. I know Rob has shared similar beliefs in the past as well.

Not everything is a conspiracy.

Brad

DomainIncite had linked/referenced a 2019 nP comment from @Slanted regarding Rob Monster and (moon/murder) conspiracies.

Slow down. Rob is not a monster. The worst thing that I could ever say about him is that he has a weird conspiratorial streak. In particular, he interprets every massacre as a "false flag" โ€“ from 9/11 to the synagogue shooting to this New Zealand attack. Yes, even the moon landing. Rob told me he believes that flag is false too.

True or False, there are some things we may never know for sure. Especially if we are the [it didn't happen unless I saw it] type. For most, the belief that the moon landing was real is simply a leap of faith.

And to this, I mean no disrespect. But I question if Rob Monster is some sort of savant. Completely unaware of his delusions because his intellect is so high and focused on other things. This theory would make more sense if Rob was an expert coder like some of Epik engineers. Sadly, I see a lot of Donald Trump in Rob Monster and I fear the advice given to him by his mustached accomplice is feeding other mustachian views.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Good point about statements being issued by other domain related companies, and that turmoil is being felt by most. Also thank you for pointing out that not all statements were made by domain registrars or were written by an advertising firm that may or may not be trained/experienced in psyops. I prefer to drink my lemonade with honey, rather than with a hint of psyops :penguin:

Take responsible industry leaders such as @DomainTools.com


<<<>>>


If you want to talk about a domain related service that saves lives, How come you haven't mentioned the security tools and professionals behind @DomainTools.com? (imo) DomainTools.com are the real unsung industry heroes taking note, empowering the masses, and speaking, yet doesn't appear to surround themself with controversy or take grand stances for marketing purposes. Simply put, great tech speaks for itself.

Historically similar to that of the many great secretaries always taking note and taking lead when needed. While secretaries don't always (or historically haven't) receive the credit they deserve, it is no secret that some secretaries are the glue that hold some companies together. And in some historical and present cases the secretary her(or him)self is more important to some companies than the CEO itself. Meaning positions don't run companies. People do.

#ActionsThatSpeakLouderThanWords

I dont use DomainTools.

Im too poor to pay $25 per per month cheapest

Spreading conspiracies relating to mass murders is harmless? Promoting ones services of resiliency by standing up to controversy? All in the name of ___________? Free speech? The bible? Marketing without ethics?

Are you suggesting Donald Trump's birther theory wasn't racist in nature?

Fully discrediting the American Government intelligence by suggesting they allowed a man to use a fake birth certificate to become president? If that wasn't racist by nature, what would you call that? A political grand stance?


A factual search reveals that MSNBC has failed fact checks, however most of these come from Political Pundits who appear on their various TV Shows and not related to straight news reporting. News anchors and MSNBC also failed fact checks such as these:
Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently favors the establishment left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to news hosts and the website producing 3 pants on fire claims. (5/13/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 03/10/2020)

Sources: https://www.msnbc.com/

MSNBC is Left-wing propaganda.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
You can place a mirror on the Moon surface via an unmanned soft landing.

If there was no VanAllen radiation belts, then you could easily approach the Moon, and turn around it, but landing on it and coming back back safely would still require a lot more , tech, skill , matter, and energy. (by matter I mean, fuel and oxygen,.. the only way to create movement when there is no air is to create momentum, you have to push some matter in very high speed in a chosen direction, to be able to move (accelerate) in the opposite direction, ..). (I'm not a rocket scientist, but I could easily become one, if I wanted to).

EDIT: Even if there were no radiation belts around the Earth, or cosmic radiation, still the heat problem would be a big problem, because there is no place heat can escape, and engines running all the time burning fuel, and sunlight directly heats the spaceship. Plus humans create their own heat. No cooling possible, because when you cool something you would create more heat, and it can't escape, because there is no air. But if your ship is big enough , you can fix part of such problems, but in Apollo case, this is far from being the case.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
this thread is going off-topic in an uncontrollable manner
i enjoy following it but every discussion is turning into an argument
 
Last edited:
4
•••
You can place a mirror on the Moon surface via an unmanned soft landing.

no that they couldn't at that time, I guess

any explanation of the need for 6 landings?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
that the nature of a discussion
in case you don't agree
it is a sh*t show to be honest
before i was able to keep up now it is getting to be a bit much
you people got some strength in you to carry on like this :D
enjoyable nonetheless go on
 
1
•••
no that they couldn't at that time, I guess

any explanation for the 6 landings?

6 fake landings... Many accidents happen when firing a rocket on the earth, but when we go to the moon everything happens smoothly? Leaving the earth . landing, and coming back. Landing on and leaving the Moon requires equal amount of energy, less than what is needed to leave the Earth, but still too big for the kitchen-sized funny looking Apollo module. We would need rockets on all sides (and at least 4 rockets) of it just to make sure we don't move in the wrong direction, and in such a case quickly correct the direction. I mean, just controlling the direction of the movement of the space craft would be a difficult thing at that time. Today we are much better in electronics and everything else. But still we are not ready.. Why didn't humanity celebrate 50th year of humanity's greatest achievement. and instead we talked about going to the Mars, just talked. But unmanned Mars landing may be real, there is atmosphere, and no life or coming back needed etc.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
6 fake landings... Many accidents happen when firing a rocket on the earth, but when we go to the moon everything happens smoothly? Leaving the earth . landing, and coming back. Landing on and leaving the Moon equires equal amount of energy, less than what is needed to leave the Earth, but still too big for the kitchen-sized funny looking Apollo module. We would need rockets on all sides (and at least 4 rockets) of it just to make sure we don't move in the wrong direction, and in such a case quickly correct the direction. I mean, just controlling the direction of the movement of the space craft would be a difficult thing at that time. Today we are much better in electronics and everything else. But still we are not ready.. Why didn't humanity celebrate 50th year of humanity's greatest achievement. and instead we talked about going to the Mars, just talked. But unmanned Mars landing may be real, there is atmosphere, and no life or coming back needed etc.


ok
so you don't know either

1 fake landing would have been enough
considering the risk of been discovered
it makes no sense to fake it 6 times

do you get it?


and hey:
Houston we have problem

wow they done everything to make it look real
 
Last edited:
2
•••
All are fake of course. If one of them was real , this would be as great thing as all 6 being real. Without Apollo movies, we could say, it is a very difficult thing to do, close to impossible, but after seeing those movies we don't need to argue. For example an astronaut climbing a 3M (10 foot) ladder, no need to do it, he could just jump that much. Ok this is not a proof but we should have seen such high jumps. A real proof, a car is moving on the moon (read, Nevada desert), tires of the car move moon dust, but moon dust "hits the air" instead of following a perfect parabolic path. When there is no air, a piece of paper drops in the same way a piece of rock does. Instead we see a very earth-like behavior. Flag is waving. No stars in the sky etc. But my favorite is moon dust hitting the air, there can be no excuse for it.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
All are fake of course.
Hi
No disrespect intended,
But by any chance are you Russian?

A rumor has been going on that Russian trolls
Influenced the 2016 US presidential election.

Though I'm not quite sure who are these alleged Russian trolls
But I imagine
They spread fake news
Like fake moon landings,
So if you are one,
Or if you could introduce me to one,
That'd be great!

Because I have a theory,
That America is great
And we have the greatest trolls
So I question if it even was Russian trolls?

For arguments sake,
Let's say they were Russian trolls,
I ask, (in seriousness)
Which is worse?
That they are trolls?
Or that they are Russian?
(Allegedly)
 
Last edited:
3
•••
You can place a mirror on the Moon surface via an unmanned soft landing.

If there was no VanAllen radiation belts, then you could easily approach the Moon, and turn around it, but landing on it and coming back back safely would still require a lot more , tech, skill , matter, and energy. (by matter I mean, fuel and oxygen,.. the only way to create movement when there is no air is to create momentum, you have to push some matter in very high speed in a chosen direction, to be able to move (accelerate) in the opposite direction, ..). (I'm not a rocket scientist, but I could easily become one, if I wanted to).

Iโ€™ll take a quarter of whatever your smoking buddy. Great thread full of both fact and fiction. I am considering hosting a couple controversial websites. Epik will get my business(y)
 
3
•••
Iโ€™ll take a quarter of whatever your smoking buddy. Great thread full of both fact and fiction. I

I agree.

Hat to the OP ๐ŸŽฉ

Do you know the difference between hate speech and free speech?

Your true color is starting to show.

I do. Hate speech is what you just did.

Just want draw some attention back to page 4 of this thread. And speak out against myself and up for @dna.

+1 for @dna calling a spade a spade.

Maybe he's correct.
And Maybe I was incorrect.
I disagreed with the post because of the context,
But rereading it, I do acknowledge,
From an academia stand point
There is certainly an argument,
That I should/could have used a more politically correct word,
Than color,
Ignorance being the first that comes to mind.
So my use of color in itself could be just as ignorant if not more, if you consider I knew better. In this instance I feel it was a good use for debate purposes.

Though, I do apologise if you were offended @dna.

โœŒ๏ธ๐Ÿ’—๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค™
 
Last edited:
2
•••
It is hard to have a serious discussion with someone who thinks the Moon landing was a hoax. I know Rob has shared similar beliefs in the past as well.

Not everything is a conspiracy.

Brad
Of course you mean the 6 moon landings.
(Corrected thanks frank), 7 moon missions.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Of course you mean the 7 moon landings.

quote google search:
"how many moon landings? "

--
Six missions landed people on the Moon, beginning with Apollo 11 in July 1969, during which Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the Moon. Apollo 13 was intended to land, however it was restricted to a flyby due to a malfunction aboard the spacecraft. All nine crewed missions returned safely to the Earth.

-

hey please,
explain to me
why they needed an emergency
with Appolo 13

if it was all fake

why did the not just fake it once
and bingo
"we landed on the moon"

7 tries and 6 actual landings

I don't know why there was dust
if any

but you won't convince me
as there is no way that 480000 won't talk

even 1
he would talk sooner or later
 
Last edited:
2
•••
quote google search:
"how many moon landings? "

--
Six missions landed people on the Moon, beginning with Apollo 11 in July 1969, during which Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the Moon. Apollo 13 was intended to land, however it was restricted to a flyby due to a malfunction aboard the spacecraft. All nine crewed missions returned safely to the Earth.

-

hey please,
explain to me
why they needed an emergency
with Appolo 13

if it was all fake

why did the not just fake it once
and bingo
"we landed on the moon"

7 tries and 6 actual landings

I don't know why there was dust
if any

but you won't convince me
as there is no way that 480000 won't talk

even 1
he would talk sooner or later
Yes 6 moon landings and 1 disaster in space.
 
2
•••
Free speech doesn't include the internet as it isn't only among peers regardless of subject.
 
1
•••
All are fake of course. If one of them was real , this would be as great thing as all 6 being real. Without Apollo movies, we could say, it is a very difficult thing to do, close to impossible, but after seeing those movies we don't need to argue. For example an astronaut climbing a 3M (10 foot) ladder, no need to do it, he could just jump that much. Ok this is not a proof but we should have seen such high jumps. A real proof, a car is moving on the moon (read, Nevada desert), tires of the car move moon dust, but moon dust "hits the air" instead of following a perfect parabolic path. When there is no air, a piece of paper drops in the same way a piece of rock does. Instead we see a very earth-like behavior. Flag is waving. No stars in the sky etc. But my favorite is moon dust hitting the air, there can be no excuse for it.


ok
here is the dust issue explained:
( and the video shown )

[you couldn't do it that way on earth
by the way]

https://www.wired.com/2013/03/the-acceleration-of-moon-dust/

quote
On the moon, the dust is just like a projectile motion. It goes up and it comes right down. There are no dust trails left by the lunar rover.
 
1
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Appraise.net
Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back