- Impact
- 18,367


Soviet Union was number 1 in space tech, and Kennedy (who is a good guy) said we will go to the Moon first. But he was killed for other reason (trying to eliminate deepstate control).. Anyway maybe space race would be bad both for Soviets and US, and I suspect they made a deal, US would create fake moon landing movies, and Soviets wouldn't make any objection, and this way space-race would slow down. Part of this story is my invention, but it makes a lot of sense. Most people on Apollo program didn't even know what the hell they were doing. Maybe they were building undreground cities. Anyway, I'm sure Apollo Moon landings are totally fake. They are movies by Kubrick (another good guy), and he hinted that it was all fake , in other movies, for example in Shining there is a sentence "A11 work and no joy makes Jack a dull boy".
It is hard to have a serious discussion with someone who thinks the Moon landing was a hoax. I know Rob has shared similar beliefs in the past as well.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Brad
Slow down. Rob is not a monster. The worst thing that I could ever say about him is that he has a weird conspiratorial streak. In particular, he interprets every massacre as a "false flag" โ from 9/11 to the synagogue shooting to this New Zealand attack. Yes, even the moon landing. Rob told me he believes that flag is false too.
Good point about statements being issued by other domain related companies, and that turmoil is being felt by most. Also thank you for pointing out that not all statements were made by domain registrars or were written by an advertising firm that may or may not be trained/experienced in psyops. I prefer to drink my lemonade with honey, rather than with a hint of psyops
Take responsible industry leaders such as @DomainTools.com
<<<>>>
If you want to talk about a domain related service that saves lives, How come you haven't mentioned the security tools and professionals behind @DomainTools.com? (imo) DomainTools.com are the real unsung industry heroes taking note, empowering the masses, and speaking, yet doesn't appear to surround themself with controversy or take grand stances for marketing purposes. Simply put, great tech speaks for itself.
Historically similar to that of the many great secretaries always taking note and taking lead when needed. While secretaries don't always (or historically haven't) receive the credit they deserve, it is no secret that some secretaries are the glue that hold some companies together. And in some historical and present cases the secretary her(or him)self is more important to some companies than the CEO itself. Meaning positions don't run companies. People do.
#ActionsThatSpeakLouderThanWords
Spreading conspiracies relating to mass murders is harmless? Promoting ones services of resiliency by standing up to controversy? All in the name of ___________? Free speech? The bible? Marketing without ethics?
Are you suggesting Donald Trump's birther theory wasn't racist in nature?
Fully discrediting the American Government intelligence by suggesting they allowed a man to use a fake birth certificate to become president? If that wasn't racist by nature, what would you call that? A political grand stance?
You can place a mirror on the Moon surface via an unmanned soft landing.
i enjoy following it but every discussion is turning into an argument
it is a sh*t show to be honestthat the nature of a discussion
in case you don't agree
no that they couldn't at that time, I guess
any explanation for the 6 landings?
6 fake landings... Many accidents happen when firing a rocket on the earth, but when we go to the moon everything happens smoothly? Leaving the earth . landing, and coming back. Landing on and leaving the Moon equires equal amount of energy, less than what is needed to leave the Earth, but still too big for the kitchen-sized funny looking Apollo module. We would need rockets on all sides (and at least 4 rockets) of it just to make sure we don't move in the wrong direction, and in such a case quickly correct the direction. I mean, just controlling the direction of the movement of the space craft would be a difficult thing at that time. Today we are much better in electronics and everything else. But still we are not ready.. Why didn't humanity celebrate 50th year of humanity's greatest achievement. and instead we talked about going to the Mars, just talked. But unmanned Mars landing may be real, there is atmosphere, and no life or coming back needed etc.
HiAll are fake of course.
You can place a mirror on the Moon surface via an unmanned soft landing.
If there was no VanAllen radiation belts, then you could easily approach the Moon, and turn around it, but landing on it and coming back back safely would still require a lot more , tech, skill , matter, and energy. (by matter I mean, fuel and oxygen,.. the only way to create movement when there is no air is to create momentum, you have to push some matter in very high speed in a chosen direction, to be able to move (accelerate) in the opposite direction, ..). (I'm not a rocket scientist, but I could easily become one, if I wanted to).
Iโll take a quarter of whatever your smoking buddy. Great thread full of both fact and fiction. I
Do you know the difference between hate speech and free speech?
Your true color is starting to show.
I do. Hate speech is what you just did.
Of course you mean the 6 moon landings.It is hard to have a serious discussion with someone who thinks the Moon landing was a hoax. I know Rob has shared similar beliefs in the past as well.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Brad
Of course you mean the 7 moon landings.
Yes 6 moon landings and 1 disaster in space.quote google search:
"how many moon landings? "
--
Six missions landed people on the Moon, beginning with Apollo 11 in July 1969, during which Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the Moon. Apollo 13 was intended to land, however it was restricted to a flyby due to a malfunction aboard the spacecraft. All nine crewed missions returned safely to the Earth.
-
hey please,
explain to me
why they needed an emergency
with Appolo 13
if it was all fake
why did the not just fake it once
and bingo
"we landed on the moon"
7 tries and 6 actual landings
I don't know why there was dust
if any
but you won't convince me
as there is no way that 480000 won't talk
even 1
he would talk sooner or later
All are fake of course. If one of them was real , this would be as great thing as all 6 being real. Without Apollo movies, we could say, it is a very difficult thing to do, close to impossible, but after seeing those movies we don't need to argue. For example an astronaut climbing a 3M (10 foot) ladder, no need to do it, he could just jump that much. Ok this is not a proof but we should have seen such high jumps. A real proof, a car is moving on the moon (read, Nevada desert), tires of the car move moon dust, but moon dust "hits the air" instead of following a perfect parabolic path. When there is no air, a piece of paper drops in the same way a piece of rock does. Instead we see a very earth-like behavior. Flag is waving. No stars in the sky etc. But my favorite is moon dust hitting the air, there can be no excuse for it.
