As soon as I saw who the author was I felt it will be lightning rod but I don't have anything bad to say about Roger Stone and wanted to suggest something comprehensive and well reviewed. If you don't understand the extent of judicial corruption you should know that it exists and is stacked. Especially if there is a extensive PR campaign associated with a political case. That was part of the Muller investigation into russia collusion that came up empty.
You could also take a look at General Flynn's case. If you know the exact basis for their trials it would offend your cannuck soul
Dinesh D'Sousa's case and story are an interesting.
In Canada, the Liberal government had the RCMP charge Vice-Admiral Mark Norman, that case is very interesting if you can get the details rather than the CBC perspective.
Back to the post..
I don't know if you are just playing devil's advocate but you already are aware that there are sexual allegations against Clinton so not sure how my post of double standards could be invalid.
I do enjoy a real point of view because it is tiring to live in a bubble and I am more interested to know what others think.
"It Ain't What You Don’t Know That Gets You Into Trouble. It’s What You Know for Sure That Just Ain’t So"