Dynadot

warning Does Rami Steitieh A/K/A steitieh Shill? You Decide.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

N-A

Account Closed
Impact
7,590
In March of 2016 @steitieh was found guilty of shill bidding on NamePros with @tha-she. While these two members are no longer permitted to conduct business with each other here, @steitieh is still able to participate in the marketplace and carries an undeserving PRO badge.

Recently, Rami was accused of shill bidding again. However, the evidence is circumstantial, at best, but it's admitted by him that he had close personal acquaintances bid on his auctions – something that we all know that most other marketplaces would never tolerate.

Beware: if you choose to bid on one of @steitieh 's auctions, know that someone else may be purposefully bidding you up.
 
19
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
I have watched many of Steitieh's auctions. I always wonder whether he is pure genius or something going on backdoor. The bidding price goes up dramatically. I have few dictionary COM names and I find it hard to cross even $50. Noway I am implicating Steitieh but just stating my observation. I am still an intermediate domainer and not a pro like Steitieh. He was very polite in the brief interaction we had once.
I also think Eric is unbiased. May be he does not have sufficient proof to ban the members. The case seems to be a case of 'plausible deniability.'
 
1
•••
0
•••
@iAchilles - I'm going to need you to explain how you came to these conclusions.

The domain names from those auctions are showing different registrants (They do not show @steitieh). Several of those domains have since been relisted on NamePros by other members (Indicating a sale to other members).

I was certainly never contacted and informed the highest bidder backed out. If @steitieh did contact other highest bidders I'm sure he can show pms to refute my question. You just called my post inaccurate via PM, based on my experience it's entirely accurate. I never saw that name listed again on NP. It was 046.me

I will rephrase my question to @steitieh . Did you contact the users below to inform them that the highest bidder backed out?

@ExeatGH not online since May

Were you offered the name as the next highest bidder?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/sold-and-closed.929999/#post-5393881

@vickyhunter
Were you offered the name as the next highest bidder?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/closed.916939/page-2#post-5296375

@dname
Were you offered the name as the next highest bidder?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/sold-and-closed.929208/#post-5398173

@Brandon432 - not online since April 2016
Were you offered the name as the next highest bidder?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/sold-and-closed.918621/page-2#post-5320983
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Ouch, bloody hell!

Oh wait, that's not a shill because we can't 100% prove it! :)
Exactly. It's external to namePros and I highly doubt Flippa would verify why these two bidders were suspended / banned. His nefarious activities aren't just isolated to namePros as to why I didn't make this a namePros specific warning.

Circumstantial. But, I see that you have a brain and can put 2 and 2 together yourself.

Does Rami Steitieh A/K/A steitieh Shill? You Decide.
 
1
•••
You just called my post inaccurate via PM, based on my experience it's entirely accurate. I never saw that name listed again on NP. It was 046.me
That domain name is not registered to @steitieh which indicates he sold it since then.

Your post is misleading:
You had an interested party at the table on 5 different occasions yet you didn't relist, you didn't contact the next highest bidder, you made no further effort to try and sell the domain via Namepros. May I ask what your reasoning behind this decision was?
Your post says that on 5 different occasions he did not relist, contact the next highest bidder, or try to sell the domains on NamePros. That means he did not do any of those three things for all 5 of those cases. How do you know he didn't relist them on NamePros? How do you know he didn't sell it to another NamePros member in private messages?

Keep in mind that once a thread has been edited to remove the domain name, it will not show up in our search anymore.

Here are a couple facts:
  • The domain names from those auctions are showing different registrants (They do not show @steitieh).
  • Several of those domains have since been relisted on NamePros by other members (Indicating a sale to other members).
 
2
•••
That domain name is not registered to @steitieh which indicates he sold it since then.

Your post is misleading:

Your post says that on 5 different occasions he did not relist, contact the next highest bidder, or try to sell the domains on NamePros. That means he did not do any of those three things for all 5 of those cases. How do you know he didn't relist them on NamePros? How do you know he didn't sell it to another NamePros member in private messages?

Keep in mind that once a thread has been edited to remove the domain name, it will not show up in our search anymore.

Here are a couple facts:
  • The domain names from those auctions are showing different registrants (They do not show @steitieh).
  • Several of those domains have since been relisted on NamePros by other members (Indicating a sale to other members).

Fair enough, feel free to remove my post, but my question above (rephrased) is valid and I would appreciate an explanation from @steitieh as to why he never informed me of the fact that the name was available due to the winner backing out.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
We're fortunate that namepros does not take commission and therefore has an incentive to root out and punish shill bidders.

But it appears near impossible to catch a competent offender. The standard of infallible proof is basically unattainable, which means any ruling, of either guilt or innocence, will have an element of guesswork involved. So the outcome is always going to be unsatisfactory for somebody.

It's in the hands of the toaster ovens now...
 
3
•••
0
•••



You Forgot this One As Everybody Become Sherlock Holmes

https://www.namepros.com/threads/closed.976865/page-2#post-5782377
What's that have to do with anything? Is @4better (the OP of that auction thread) the same as @steitieh? I know business accounts are allowed a personal account, and if this is the case, it could open up a whole new can of worms as his "personal" account is unknown/non-existant. Thanks for sharing, and clarifying, if that so happens to be the case.
 
0
•••
What's that have to do with anything? Is @4better (the OP of that auction thread) the same as @steitieh? I know business accounts are allowed a personal account, and if this is the case, it could open up a whole new can of worms as his "personal" account is unknown/non-existant. Thanks for sharing, and clarifying, if that so happens to be the case.


David you are a sick person, I put this example to know that there is what is called an auction in who wins and who loses
It seems that everyone in namepros is thieves and you are the only honest person
It seems that you have personal grudges with Mr. Rami
 
0
•••
David you are a sick person, I put this example to know that there is what is called an auction in who wins and who loses
It seems that everyone in namepros is thieves and you are the only honest person
It seems that you have personal grudges with Mr. Rami
Then, that's off topic. We're discussing your nefarious activities bidding up @steitieh's auctions as a shill; not your personal business decisions elsewhere.
 
0
•••
Leaving positive feedback for a transaction that never completed goes to show what type of character someone has.
In what world the non paying winner leaves positive feedback for a transaction that never took place?
New sheep! Follow along, please.. because you missed this:

Why don't you actually check what you're copying/pasting before you believe it to be true. Show us screenshots of these "fake reviews."

All of those auctions are from February 2016 and March 2016 and there is not a single TradeReview to/from Tha-She from/to steitieh during that time.​

I always wonder whether he is pure genius or something going on backdoor. The bidding price goes up dramatically.
It's called outbound. He's already explained this. Ali Zandi does the same thing to success: outbound. His auctions will always be higher than all of us that don't do it (myself included) for the same reason.
 
0
•••
I don't want to get involved in the drama, and these are serious accusations with flimsy evidence. I just had to speak to the "evidence" regarding Rami's Flippa auction where several of the bidders were subsequently banned.

I went through my last five auctions on Flippa and checked the bidding history. Four out of the last five auctions had one or more users who placed bids that have since either been marked Suspended, Banned, or Account Closed. On two out of the four auctions one of the banned users won and paid for the auction.

I have never participated in shill bidding, so clearly this isn't "proof" of anything, other than that a lot of Flippa users are unprofessional and their vetting process needs some work, but also that Flippa is very aggressive at getting rid of problematic users which is how it should be.

I think that bit of evidence points more to the rampant problem in this industry of people placing bids and not treating their bids as binding contracts. This happens for many reasons including pure stupidity, bidding on many auctions simultaneously and winning more than was expected, wanting that rush of bidding despite lack of funds, etc. NONE of which are valid excuses. That said it could certainly be failed attempts at shill bidding.

This also shows how very difficult it is to prove shill bidding. The best circumstantial evidence is a consistent pattern of one or more people winning his auctions and then not paying, while also bidding heavily in other auctions but bailing before winning. Even that isn't undeniable proof, but I doubt NamePros will be getting subpoenas on communications between the parties to see if they colluded.

There are several problems with this. First, it could very well be that the winning bidder who didn't complete is just an idiot and there was no collusion. Second, you only catch the people who are bad at shill bidding, the good ones don't have their shill accidentally win very often, if ever.

Finally, without that proof of communication between the parties showing collusion it is still circumstantial, and given that people are smart enough not to collude via NamePros PM admins will never have access to this proof. So in my view admins need to get comfortable with the idea of banning people even without 100% proof in order to protect the integrity of the marketplace. That is what other marketplaces do. Most have a zero-tolerance policy for non-payment, others will let one "mistake" slide but after that you're banned. Here you can do it five times on one person's auctions and continue to participate?!

Yes, I have allowed many people who won my auctions not pay – but not only auctions, many people came to me with offers and backed out and it was cool with me. And like the “Yellow Tagged Dancer” asks, did I get other un-payers and never reported them: YES

Plus, Cecill (Tha-She) came out and said clearly that she asked for that (Backing out of the auction due to personal issues and lack of funds as my auctions are usually long) and YES I agreed. And If anybody else did the same, I would have agreed too – that’s just me and it’s not anybody’s business to judge.

This is what really concerns me in this thread. First of all, someone admitted to bailing on no less than five of his auctions after winning... why was the response to not let this person bid on his auctions, rather than removing their marketplace access entirely? Someone who habitually doesn't take their winning bids seriously is not someone I would want tainting the "integrity" of the marketplace.

But more importantly, Rami's attitude of letting people bail on their bids like it is no big deal. As a member of the community and the marketplace it is partially your responsibility to help NamePros police it and keep it clean. Not reporting people for breaking the rules isn't being a "nice guy", it is condoning unprofessional behavior and ensuring that it can continue, which can and will harm others. It is not your decision whether or not to let people break NamePros' rules, you need to report them and let the mods decide if their reasoning is acceptable. Period.

In that comment I quoted above, you're basically advertising to everyone who reads this thread that they can bid on your auctions regardless of their intention of winning, without fear of repercussions. They get the rush of bidding in an auction and feeling important, which for some reason a lot of newcomers get a kick out of. And you get increased bidding activity where it might not have otherwise been. That seems like an invitation to shill to me, but in fairness it could just be a misguided attempt at being likable.

It should be added to the marketplace rules that if you get a non-paying bidder you *must* report them, otherwise you risk getting your own access terminated. It will still be hard to catch and will require precious time to monitor, but it will end this buddy buddy bullsh!t because doing "favors" will put your own account at risk and most people aren't that "nice".

Do I think you're running a shill-bidding ring? I don't see nearly enough evidence. Do I think you've made some really poor decisions by taking it upon yourself to decide when forum rules should be enforced and when they should not? Definitely.
 
Last edited:
20
•••
Then, that's off topic. We're discussing your nefarious activities bidding up @steitieh's auctions as a shill; not your personal business decisions elsewhere.

Listen, boy, I'm a wealthy person and I don't need for boys games I have come here to invest my money
and I bought many domains from other people why no body says I'm doing something wrong with them
 
0
•••
@Michael - Very good post. Thank you for that contribution.
 
1
•••
@Michael -

When other marketplaces are careless or less thorough, I do not consider those examples of being more aggressive. Very few companies would spend as many hours as we've spent on this, because doing so is impractical, but that doesn't mean that lazily clicking a ban button is aggressive (It's just lazy). We pride ourselves on being impractically thorough when it comes to investigations and that is aggressive.


Edit: Please see the posts below for more details.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Here you can do it five times on one person's auctions and continue to participate?!
This is what really concerns me in this thread. First of all, someone admitted to bailing on no less than five of his auctions after winning... why was the response to not let this person bid on his auctions, rather than removing their marketplace access entirely? Someone who habitually doesn't take their winning bids seriously is not someone I would want tainting the "integrity" of the marketplace.

To clarify, the person backing out of 5 auctions with Rami was also backing out of most of her other auctions with other members, as she seemed to have overbid. Normally, this would have gotten her banned, but the other members--not just Rami--were willing to work things out. She seems to have learned her lesson and has been quite reliable since then.

This also shows how very difficult it is to prove shill bidding. The best circumstantial evidence is a consistent pattern of one or more people winning his auctions and then not paying, while also bidding heavily in other auctions but bailing before winning. Even that isn't undeniable proof, but I doubt NamePros will be getting subpoenas on communications between the parties to see if they colluded.

We spend a lot of time and effort resolving disputes and investigating any allegations of fraud. While it's true that there are times when it's not possible to prove or disprove shill bidding, we firmly believe this is not one of those times. There is sufficient evidence that Rami is neither shill bidding nor attempting a massive effort to avoid getting caught. The evidence we've obtained through private conversations and audit logs is far more objective than any patterns you may be observing.

It's in the hands of the toaster ovens now...

The toaster ovens are fairly certain there was no malicious intent. Obviously we can't share all of the conversations we've witnessed, but Eric's posts have made it pretty clear that the continuation of this thread only serves to promote various misunderstandings of the situation at hand. @Michael has done a good job explaining just how narrow some of these views are.

Thirteen pages later, we're not any closer to proving that shill bidding took place, and there's significant evidence in Rami's favor in the form of private conversations, audit logs, and video. It's impossible to formally disprove David's theory, but the chances of it being true are quite slim. It's time we lay this issue to rest.
 
Last edited:
6
•••
Update

I would like to give an update on our investigations and respond to concerns that were expressed.

First and foremost, I want to assure everyone that NamePros is very aggressive at removing unethical users from our marketplace. We close accounts and revoke marketplace access all the time, and we almost always do it before any serious problems occur. This all goes on behind the scenes thanks to member reports, a proactive staff, and automated systems that we have in place that help us quickly detect and stop unethical behavior. The vast majority of the time, things run smoothly without anyone knowing about all of this work going on in the background and the measures being taken to keep everyone safe.

The great thing about NamePros is that it offers everyone the ability to conduct their own thorough investigations on potentially unethical members. If anything is found, they can report it to us and we’ll swiftly take action. If nothing conclusive is found from a member’s research but there is still suspicion, we’re always happy to investigate it ourselves to see if we can uncover anything. We’re the only major domain marketplace that offers this level of transparency, and it is the reason that we’re one of the safest places to do business.

Even with an unparalleled level of scrutiny on every member, there are very few reports of misconduct or scams taking place on NamePros, and that is fully accredited to our processes, members, and team working diligently to keep the community safe. I guarantee that if this same level of scrutiny and research could be applied to certain other websites by their members, you'd be shocked at what you found and how much fraud goes completely undetected by them, because they don’t have a community of people checking their work. At NamePros, you have the largest domain community and our dedicated staff looking out for each other, and that’s what makes it so special and unprecedented.


Live Domain Auctions

In August 2015, Rami began informing those in the domain community about his wife’s unfortunate prognosis with Hepatitis C.

In September 2016, Raymond Hackney presented the idea of running Live Domain Auctions to help quickly sell/liquidate Rami’s domains to turn them into cash for his wife’s life-saving treatment. These auctions were for domains that Rami owned and the winners of each auction received the domains they bid on after paying their winning bid amount. NamePros and Raymond did not collect any commission or charge any fees for running this auction. It was 100% free and allowed the buyers and sellers to transact freely in the same way that members do daily using the NamePros Marketplace.

I have personally verified his story: Rami sent me the login to the Diagnostic Laboratories’ website that ran the tests and provided me with video proof that his wife’s tests results for Hepatitis C were positive (confirmed as true). This proof is indisputable.

Although the auctions were a success in their own right (selling about $20,000 USD in domains), they generated a small fraction of the money that Rami needed to be able to afford his wife’s treatments, which can cost upwards of six figures for the medicine, doctors, and associated bills. That left Rami with one option: continue working and doing what he knows best to try to make more money for his wife’s treatment. Rami is a veteran domainer and the best way he knows to make money is buying and selling domains. He’s not buying domains to hold them, he’s buying them to flip for a profit so he can use the profits to pay for the medical expenses associated with his wife's condition. He regularly buys and sells domains on NamePros for a profit, and he is still working to this day to earn enough money so that he can afford his wife’s treatment. If you’d like to learn more about the treatment she needs, the name of it is HARVONI.


Bidding on Friends’ Auctions

Here’s how we look at it: If it were against the rules to buy domains from your friends, then it would be in your best interest to not make any friends within this industry so that you were never prevented from buying domains that you wanted. If it were against the rules to buy domains from your friends, then it would be to your benefit to not go to domain conferences and meet people who have the same passion as you. People you can talk about domains with, your sales, and share your experiences with. You'd need to be a loner and not make any friends with like-minded people. You’d either have to miss out on potentially really good domains or meaningful relationships. You shouldn’t have to choose between the two.

NamePros, and the domain industry in general, encourages building relationships with one another and meeting other domainers. Our industry is small enough that you could go to a domainer meetup and speak with the most successful domainers to learn from them and possibly even befriend them. We’re a friendly community and building friendships is encouraged. It's part of what makes this industry so great.

@Michael, a well-respected domainer, said it best: “I know hundreds of investors and call many of them friends, it would be crazy to not be allowed to bid on something they're selling.”


Member @tha-she

Rami’s auctions were not the only auctions that she backed out of during that time period. All auction holders (Rami and other members) released her from her commitment as the winning bidder. NamePros was not informed by any sellers of this activity. Once this was brought to our attention by uninvolved parties (concerned members of the community), we thoroughly investigated it. In an effort to err on the side of caution, @tha-she and Rami were told not to participate in each other auctions. Here is more information on that: https://www.namepros.com/posts/5787984/

At the time we verified evidence of @tha-she either requesting to back out or completing deals with Rami after the auctions completed except for one auction where they believe the request to back out took place over the phone. Here she explains it in more detail: https://www.namepros.com/posts/5787854/

Important: It only takes cancelling 2 deals for a member’s marketplace access to be revoked. However, all of the sellers in this case permitted her to back out of the deals without informing us. Since we never got involved, we don’t know what would have happened if the sellers informed us and we told her that she must complete the deals. She may have found a way to pay for all of those deals if she was given that opportunity. Since she was never given the choice between paying or us taking further action, the fairest solution we came up with was to forbid her from bidding on Rami’s auctions. Additionally, to avoid this from happening again, we’ve updated our policies to penalize sellers if they do not report non-paying auction winners.


Member @Skyvisum

@000 raised a concern about this member. @Skyvisum informed us that he hadn’t accepted the transfer of the domain name yet, which is why the whois was still showing Rami’s information. My message served as a reminder to him and he accepted it. The whois updated to his information after that.

Another common scenario to keep in mind for the future is that buyers sometimes forget to update whois after accepting a domain into their account and it's not within the seller’s control at that point. However, this was simply a case of a winning bidder forgetting to accept the transfer.

We did not find any connections/matches between @Skyvisum and Rami. They have bid on and purchased domains from several different members on NamePros over the years.


Member @DNBank.com

Here’s the conclusion:


Policy Update (New Rule)

We have added a new rule for domain auctions:
  • Rule 6.2.14. Auction holders (sellers) and the winners (buyers) must report auction sales that will not be completed.
This means everyone involved is partly responsible if the issue is not reported to us.

@Michael - Thanks for this suggestion.


Summary

We work aggressively to check, double check, and triple check every report. We have (re-)investigated several reports about Rami since this thread was created and none of them showed wrongdoing on his part. We appreciate everyone who has sent us reports because they want to protect the community, but the only questionable thing we've seen was allowing a small number of members to back out of auctions when those members were in financial distress. We have since informed Rami that he may not let anyone back out of his auctions, and he has assured us it won't happen again. He did not know that would be frowned upon, because it's actually the opposite with Buy Now and Make Offer deals: if both parties agree to cancel their non-auction agreement, that it perfectly fine and happens every day with deals everywhere: over email, phone, etc. It only becomes an issue when that happens with auction winners. All of this has been clarified to him and those involved. We also updated our policies to dissuade others from it in the future.

After days of research and countless hours, we have found zero instances of Rami violating the rules or asking anyone to violate the rules for him. We have found no evidence of anything close.

We know that it would have been easier to just ban, but we choose to take the right path instead of the easy one. NamePros does not earn any money from Rami's domain sales or his auctions. There is zero financial benefit for us to allow him to use our marketplace. The reason he is allowed to use our marketplace is simple: we investigated every report about him and no wrongdoings were found.


Closing / Status Resolved

David opened this thread with the best intentions of helping protect the community. We treated this thread like a customer support thread by investigating and responding to each report. Our investigations are complete and there were no signs of misconduct by Rami.

We value our members’ safety and satisfaction above all else, and I hope everyone understands that we never play favorites. We do everything we can to keep our members safe. We aren't perfect and oversights happen, but we will never stop working tirelessly to make NamePros everything you expect it to be.

As always, if you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us.
 
22
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back