discuss Internet of Everything (IOE) Domain Names.

[SirDrago]

I didn't see a (IOE) Internet Of Everything thread if I missed it my Apologies.

Please share your Regs and sales here if you wish.

As of lastnight I hand regged these...

Internet Of Everything....

IOECASH
IOEDOWNLOAD
IOEDRONE
IOEXTRA
IOEFOGCLOUD
IOEHOLO
IOESTREAM
IOESECURE
IOEWEAR

All in .Com

What's your outlook on the IOE industry ??

 

[Uber9]

FYI....
"IoE" dot coms currrently owned by Cisco:
IoE.com
InternetofEverything.com
ConnectingEverything.com

all forwarded to Cisco.com

 

[disaac81]

IoECertification
com

 

[Uber9]

IoECertification
com

good reg...!! that will be a good one to hold on to!!!

 

[disaac81]

ioeNFC
ioeMonitor

 

[bytedo]

Cisco also upon the importance of the term "IoE" acquired the domain "IoE.com" privately recently and is thus now forwarded to Cisco.com, yes the "IoE" term is important enough that Cisco has reported paying millions for that name.

Who is arguing about the importance of the term IOE? Important to who? Cisco. So what if Cisco paid millions for it? Lucky them the domain wasnt owned by Rick, you know the one that sits on the throne, he`d probably ask for 20% shares on top. If Cisco see IOE as a marketing ploy then it only makes sense for them to pay up for the domain. Nothing new.. Companies have been doing that since the advent of domaining.

To thus add to the importance of the term "IoE" Cisco Systems is already gearing up for "IoE" certifications not "Iot"

Incorrect
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/specializations/iot-specialization.html

With Cisco pumping billions into IoE and basically taking to the next level by hiring ISVs to create the software/delivery of IoE into production, thus Cisco is the worlds top "networking" delivery product, platform, service & applied certification suite, and thus if they are leading he way with - IoE Routers, IoE Firewalls, IoE Hubs, IoE Switches, IoE Servers, IoE Security & IoE Certifications to operate those devices thus creating the IoE industry standard as Cisco already has done. So Cisco is currently creating the standards for IoE, in time others will follow have the need to have their IT engineers become IoE certified and evolve into the IoE, it's no clearer then that IoE is the real deal and here to stay.....

Calm down please. Cisco is pumping money into IOT, which it sometimes refers to as IOE. Copying and pasting Cisco`s products and putting IOE in front of them does not support your claims. These are IOT network products. If you want to call them IOE products please go ahead. Changes nothing.

http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/trends/iot/iot-products.html

http://www.cisco.com/web/solutions/trends/iot/network-connectivity.html

Standards are created usually by a collection of stakeholders in an industry. Whereby members agree to a set level of quality,compatibility of products and best practices. So how can Cisco set any such standard unitarily? Cisco is not. Cisco is not claiming to be. Cisco is a member of many bodies trying to find a working standard for the IOT.

 

[DNGear]

Badluck...I have so many IOE's now

 

[bytedo]

In addition to your statement "Really? Is Cisco bigger than Microsoft?" you are speaking in two different technologies/sectors,Microsoft deals with PCs = platforms = software = PC, Cisco =platforms= telecommunication devices= networking, thus two completely different sectors - this of the very fundamentals when learning IT.

Stay on point please. The point of reference here is IOT and your claim that Cisco and Qualcomm are THE major players in it not what is the core business of either company or what aspect of IOT either company has products for. I mentioned Microsoft because of its size, investments and activities in IOT not because of what you are now mentioning here.The fact is Microsoft is a big company and they spend a lot on this tech just as Cisco like a host of other household names.

 

[bytedo]

Badluck...I have so many IOE's now

No at all. No one can say which name will sell and which name wont. Just that the massively accepted and industry name for this thing is IOT. Simple truth

IOEuser.Com
IOEfocus.Com

Looking good

 

[DNGear]

Internet of Things is a Trademark? or not?

 

[Uber9]

Who is arguing about the importance of the term IOE? Important to who? Cisco. So what if Cisco paid millions for it? Lucky them the domain wasnt owned by Rick, you know the one that sits on the throne, he`d probably ask for 20% shares on top. If Cisco see IOE as a marketing ploy then it only makes sense for them to pay up for the domain. Nothing new.. Companies have been doing that since the advent of domaining.



Incorrect
xxx



Calm down please. Cisco is pumping money into IOT, which it sometimes refers to as IOE. Copying and pasting Cisco`s products and putting IOE in front of them does not support your claims. These are IOT network products. If you want to call them IOE products please go ahead. Changes nothing.

xxx
xxx

"Standards are created usually by a collection of stakeholders in an industry. Whereby members agree to a set level of quality,compatibility of products and best practices. So how can Cisco set any such standard unitarily? Cisco is not. Cisco is not claiming to be. Cisco is a member of many bodies trying to find a working standard for the IOT.

"


You Are VERY WRONG ON MANY LEVELS! Standards are NOT created via the stakeholders (stakeholders are those whom have only stake in the company, and DO NOT have anything to do with the direction of it's technology OR deposition) This is why it's called stakeholders. Only the
Governing body of the executive/board members have that ability...

Standards are created by the Industry set forth by ICS 35.110: Networking, as well as empirically leveraged and gauged and thus created by the real gross product index (rgp) "ICS Networking" thus it is the industry needs basis for a products and/or products in a sector/market, in which case the case we are discussing is product sector of InterNetworking/Telecommunications = devices, platforms, ISVs and intelligent connected devices.

In addition..before you actually write as though you knew the industry. I am an Industry Veteran who has worked in the field for over 22 years. I have been an employee for IBM for the last 17 years. IBM Global Services is in partnership with Cisco Systems, Broadcom, Qualcomm, Sun, Avaya etc etc. thus we all rely on their devices tools/routers switches,PIX/Firewall, in which we will All need to obtain our certifications from our partner and one major partner is Cisco. Cisco being our partner is stating the the IoT will evolve into the IoE, thus when IoE becomes standard we will have the need to again re-certify to become compliant to those standard set forth. Again as mentioned...whether folks like yourself agree or disagree, the point is, is that Cisco ultimately sets the standard for certifications In the case of contiguous and discontiguous networks i.e., CCNA, CCNP, BCRAN etc., etc...and soon the IOE InterNetworking Certifications.
Albeit, Cisco still does refers to the term IoT, as well as the integrated term and end result is IoE. Cisco sets the standards and the industry quickly follows. As for the IoE certifications IBMs is committed adhering to those certifications.

I simply joined this forum to see why there was this interest the ownership of IoE domains, however this discussion has become somewhat serious of a debate.

Whether the debate is IoT or IoE will thus be determined on who has deeper pockets to thus promote their brand, Cisco basically sets the standards and the industry follows i.e., as stated... IBM etc.

 

[DNGear]

Oh no...I just regged WelcomeIOT.com

 

[SirDrago]

IOEProgram * Com

 

[BostonDomainer]

BusinessIoE.com

 

[bytedo]

"


You Are VERY WRONG ON MANY LEVELS! Standards are NOT created via the stakeholders (stakeholders are those whom have only stake in the company, and DO NOT have anything to do with the direction of it's technology OR deposition) This is why it's called stakeholders. Only the
Governing body of the executive/board members have that ability...

Stakeholders in business speak are those people involved in a given industry. Device or product producers, raw material/components suppliers,logistic, service providers,consultants,partners,firms.start ups, end users, clients,marketing people,designers etc. Anyone involved in both the demand and supply sectors of that industry. What is called an ecosystem. For you to say what you just said above is beyond palpable. Diabolical!.

"
Standards are created by the Industry set forth by ICS 35.110: Networking, as well as empirically leveraged and gauged and thus created by the real gross product index (rgp) "ICS Networking" thus it is the industry needs basis for a products and/or products in a sector/market, in which case the case we are discussing is product sector of InterNetworking/Telecommunications = devices, platforms, ISVs and intelligent connected devices.

Again incorrect. Even Cisco has to rely on many other companies to operate in this field. Talk less of setting standards for it. Just to make it brief and separate the wheat from all these chaff above oneM2M is a good example of an IOT standard.

http://www.tianow.org/videos/onem2m-the-global-interoperable-standard-for-m2m-and-iot/14161/

"
In addition..before you actually write as though you knew the industry. I am an Industry Veteran who has worked in the field for over 22 years.

I wouldn`t make this personal if I were you. Saying you are an industry veteran yada yada is not very smart. Does your years in an industry decide another mans knowledge of that industry? Why dont you stop making baseless grandiose claims and misrepresentations and you wouldnt have to worry if others know about the industry or not.

I have been an employee for IBM for the last 17 years. IBM Global Services is in partnership with Cisco Systems, Broadcom, Qualcomm, Sun, Avaya etc etc. thus we all rely on their devices tools/routers switches,PIX/Firewall, in which we will All need to obtain our certifications from our partner and one major partner is Cisco.
Cisco being our partner is stating the the IoT will evolve into the IoE, thus when IoE becomes standard we will have the need to again re-certify to become compliant to those standard set forth.

You are taking this "evolve" issue too literally. Cisco has a set of networking certifications which are geared towards administration and support engineers working on IOT networks which are running on Cisco systems. That is what it is now, that is what it will ever be. The only thing is once a new version of these products is released, then an engineer would have to upgrade his certification by sitting a new exam to prove he is capable of supporting the newly released version.
IOT evolving into IOE simply means that not only would machines connect and generate data (IOT), but how do we retrieve this data, analyse it and make informed business decisions with it (IOE). According to CIsco this would become the norm for businesses. However only Cisco makes this distinction and uses the term IOE when it thinks it can. Most agree that its all IOT and separating them is just silly. Cisco wouldn`t dare go all out against IOT. That would be harakiri.

Again as mentioned...and soon the IOE InterNetworking Certifications

As for the IoE certifications IBMs is committed adhering to those certifications.

You mean this?
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/specializations/iot-specialization.html

This?
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/iot

Could it be:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/internet_of_things

I simply joined this forum to see why there was this interest the ownership of IoE domains, however this discussion has become somewhat serious of a debate.

Hearty welcome to Namepros. Its a serious website with a laid back informal feel. Mainly

Whether the debate is IoT or IoE will thus be determined on who has deeper pockets to thus promote their brand, Cisco basically sets the standards and the industry follows i.e., as stated... IBM etc.

Like I said Cisco is very clever how its pushing this IOE slogan. Cisco does not have a hold on the technology as it does over traditional conventional networking. So it has to be careful. Any loss of sales. loss of profits, investors get agitated and heads start to roll. This is a whole new ball game. Even inside Cisco, there are dissenting voices over what is considered a silly marketing strategy. No I am not an insider. Dont ask me how I know but I do.

 

[Uber9]

Dont embarass yourself please. Stakeholders in business speak are those people involved in a given industry. Device or product producers, raw material/components suppliers,logistic, service providers,consultants,partners,firms.start ups, end users, clients,marketing people,designers etc. Anyone involved in both the demand and supply sectors of that industry. What is called an ecosystem. For you to say what you just said above is beyond palpable. Diabolical!.



Again incorrect. Even Cisco has to rely on many other companies to operate in this field. Talk less of setting standards for it. Just to make it brief and separate the wheat from all these chaff above oneM2M is a good example of an IOT standard.

sss




I wouldn`t make this personal if I were you. Saying you are an industry veteran yada yada is not very smart. Does your years in an industry decide another mans knowledge of that industry? Why dont you stop making baseless grandiose claims and misrepresentations and you wouldnt have to worry if others know about the industry or not.



You are taking this "evolve" issue too literally. Cisco has a set of networking certifications which are geared towards administration and support engineers working on IOT networks which are running on Cisco systems. That is what it is now, that is what it will ever be. The only thing is once a new version of these products is released, then an engineer would have to upgrade his certification by sitting a new exam to prove he is capable of supporting the newly released version.
IOT evolving into IOE simply means that not only would machines connect and generate data (IOT), but how do we retrieve this data, analyse it and make informed business decisions with it (IOE). According to CIsco this would become the norm for businesses. However only Cisco makes this distinction and uses the term IOE when it thinks it can. Most agree that its all IOT and separating them is just silly. Cisco wouldn`t dare go all out against IOT. That would be harakiri.



You mean this?
sss

This?
xxx

Could it be:
xxx







Like I said Cisco is very clever how its pushing this IOE slogan. Cisco does not have a hold on the technology as it does over traditional conventional networking. So it has to be careful. Any loss of sales. loss of profits, investors get agitated and heads start to roll. This is a whole new ball game. Even inside Cisco, there are dissenting voices over what is considered a silly marketing strategy. No I am not an insider. Dont ask me how I know but I do.

You are an embarrassment, and continue to babble on showing your ignorance in two fields you have no idea what you are speaking of...

Also who here is getting personal...
1) You say "Stakeholders in business speak" What is that, I've never heard of that term do you care to explain yourself? There is no such thing...bytedo
You have no business explaining about "Stakeholders" and misinforming
these great people here. Go do yourself a favor and take a entry level class in business administration and learn what actually a stakeholder is...
Stakeholders are merely are investors who's primary purpose is the performance of the company's stock, assets of the company, not standards, again "Standards" is governed by the ISO not stakeholders.
Go take a class, quit misinforming these good folks here...
You are easily pointed out as one whom is ignorant and an embarrassment only to yourself. In addition, the way you write and thus construct your statements, while using improper and convoluted information regarding the IT industry is rather appalling.

You are surreptitiously giving misinformation, why and to what extent you are doing so is beyond comprehension, especially yours... give it up bytedo... your answers are not convincing nor professional to the least...

In addition - I do take offense and resent you mocking my character as an industry veteran and professional in my field - you have Zero Basis to attack my character in such way i.e., "Yada Yada"...which is very childish to the least..

 

[Uber9]

bytedo
I will not respond to you any longer...
Its one thing to engage in good discussion, without going after someone's character and defame them ignorantly and thus continue to be belligerent, not my idea of a good healthy discussion.

 

[bytedo]

@Uber9 Dude let it go. You made statements which are wrong, I pointed this out and showed you with facts. Its up all there for any fair minded, reasonable person to see. End of

I tried to end the debate on a light-hearted friendly note but you came back with this? I havent insulted you or ever been belligerent to anyone on this forum. I can accuse you too of attempting to insult me.

No one is wrong all the time and I dont think anyone is right all the time but I can proudly say my contribution to this forum has been largely constructive, insightful, friendly, helpful and on point. If anyone has been misinforming the forum, on this occasion its you.

Just for the records, everything I say on the forum especially regarding tech and finance is based on years of working and writing certification after certification in these fields.

PS: Stakeholders and business speak are fairly well used terms these days. You never heard of them. Somewhat strange for someone who has worked for IBM for such a long time.

Business Speak : Wikipedia
Stakeholders: BusinessDictionary

 

[bretttina]

My only 1 IOE name

IOEWearables . com

 

[Dominium]

ioe.news

 

[SirDrago]

My only 1 IOE name

IOEWearables . com

Nice reg indeed.

 

[Apple888]

My only 1 IOE name

IOEWearables . com

very good reg...when did you score that one? I believe it will very valuable in the near future!!

 

[Apple888]

ioe.news

Nice reg!!! I've been doing lots of research on IoT and the IoE it appears that these domains are already selling on sedo...well IoT that is.. however once IoE becomes more common I bet IoE name will kick in...and start selling - and if cisco is correct in IoT will eventually evolve from things to "everything" IoE TLDs will indeed prove to be even more valuable.

 

[Apple888]

Business Speak : Wikipedia
Stakeholders: BusinessDictionary

HI just curious cruising through the IoT and IoE domain forums - do you have a link ? for your claim there? I've not heard of that statement either?... Been workin' at HP for awhile in IT really haven't heard of that one?

 

[Apple888]

You are an embarrassment, and continue to babble on showing your ignorance in two fields you have no idea what you are speaking of...

Also who here is getting personal...
1) You say "Stakeholders in business speak" What is that, I've never heard of that term do you care to explain yourself? There is no such thing...bytedo
You have no business explaining about "Stakeholders" and misinforming
these great people here. Go do yourself a favor and take a entry level class in business administration and learn what actually a stakeholder is...
Stakeholders are merely are investors who's primary purpose is the performance of the company's stock, assets of the company, not standards, again "Standards" is governed by the ISO not stakeholders.
Go take a class, quit misinforming these good folks here...
You are easily pointed out as one whom is ignorant and an embarrassment only to yourself. In addition, the way you write and thus construct your statements, while using improper and convoluted information regarding the IT industry is rather appalling.

You are surreptitiously giving misinformation, why and to what extent you are doing so is beyond comprehension, especially yours... give it up bytedo... your answers are not convincing nor professional to the least...

In addition - I do take offense and resent you mocking my character as an industry veteran and professional in my field - you have Zero Basis to attack my character in such way i.e., "Yada Yada"...which is very childish to the least..

wow, I really wouldn't get caught up in this, most folk specially in forums like to sound "tekky" even if they don't make a lick of sense, and trying to correct them like your doing is not worth it bro, it's like running against the wind...... chill bro! or maybe even "I hear you Brother" as Hogan would say....ha!

 

[bretttina]

very good reg...when did you score that one? I believe it will very valuable in the near future!!

Thank you

I got this one last year aand have had 4 offers thus far upto high $xxx but I'm holding out for more