Unstoppable Domains — Get your daily AI drops report

opinion Should Domainers Be Developers?

NamecheapNamecheap
This argument comes up every now and then and it drives me a little crazy. Someone posts about building out one of their domains and the gatekeepers show up: "Real domainers don't develop, they invest." As if the two things can't coexist.

I don't get this mentality at all. When I'm looking at a domain to buy, I'm already thinking about what could go there. What kind of site makes sense? Who's the audience? How would it make money? That's literally part of my decision process on whether to pull the trigger on a purchase. If I can't see a viable end user business, something I would develop or be interested in partnering in, I probably shouldn't be buying it anyway.

The anti-development crowd acts like building a site somehow makes you less of a domainer. Like you've betrayed the cause or something. It's weird tribal stuff that doesn't make sense when you actually think about it.

Their main argument is focus. Stick to domains, let end users handle the development. And sure, there's logic there if you're doing high-volume flipping. Buy a hundred domains, park them, field offers, sell when the price is right. It's clean. It's simple. No complications. Good for you.

But the domain market in 2025 isn't the wild west anymore. All the obvious stuff is registered. You're competing with AI-generated domains, NFT domains, and a million other alternatives. Standing out requires more than a parked page and a BIN price.

I've got domains that sat dead for three, four, 10 years. Nothing but junk offers from people trying to steal them for $200. Then I'd build something simple - doesn't even have to be fancy, just a basic site showing the use case - and suddenly I'm getting real inquiries or making a few bucks on affiliate sales. They get offers because I removed the guesswork. I showed them what's possible instead of making them use their imagination.

Here's what nobody talks about: development gives you leverage. A domain doesn't sell for what you want? Fine. Build it into an affiliate site or lead gen business. Now it's covering its own renewal and maybe throwing off a few bucks a month. You're not stuck fire-selling it when you need to trim the portfolio.

Some of my best exits came from developed domains. Not because the buyer wanted my exact site, but because I had traffic data and revenue numbers. That changes the entire conversation. You're not selling a speculative asset anymore - you're selling a business with metrics. That doesn't have to be approach, but it is an option.

I hand registered CoolBars.com many years ago. I had a vision of developing it. I never popped up the actual business model I wanted, but tried a few different low effort approaches. At one point, I had a handful of articles about the nightclub industry and signed up to be an affiliate of a bar supply company with a 25% commission. That lasted a few years and paid for a lifetime of renewals for the name.

The "stay in your lane" people also ignore that the lanes don't really exist anymore. SaaS companies need domains. App developers need domains. E-commerce stores need domains. We're all playing in the same space. Why would I handicap myself by refusing to learn what these buyers actually need?

And honestly? Pure domain flipping gets boring sometimes. Always challenging but sometimes boring. I didn't get into this business to be a digital warehouse manager. Each domain is a possibility, a what-if. Exploring that through actual development is fun. It scratches a creative itch that looking at sale comparables never will. It makes me an active participant.

The skills overlap anyway. If you're good at domains, you already understand keywords, search intent, market demand. That's half of what you need to build something successful. Learning basic WordPress or how to commission decent content isn't rocket science. These are natural extensions of what we already do.

I'm not saying everyone should become a developer. If you hate building sites, don't build sites. But let's stop pretending development is somehow beneath domainers or outside our scope. It's a tool. Use it when it makes sense.

The focus argument isn't completely wrong - you can spread yourself thin. Trying to actively develop 50 sites while managing a portfolio of thousands? Yeah, that's not going to work. But that's true of anything. The answer is being strategic, not avoiding development entirely.

Maybe you develop your five best domains. Maybe you focus on one niche where you actually know something. Maybe you partner with someone who handles the technical stuff. There are ways to do this without abandoning domain investing.

I also think the industry needs domainers who develop. We bring a different angle than typical startups. We're not swinging for billion-dollar exits. We're building sustainable businesses that start generating revenue fairly quickly. We understand the domain itself has value as an asset, not just as a URL for our app.

Plus, when you develop sites, you learn what end users actually want. Which features matter, which don't. What converts, what bounces. This intelligence feeds back into your acquisition strategy. You start seeing opportunities others miss because you're thinking in complete business models, not just keywords.

Some of my domains that I thought would be instant hits went nowhere. By some I mean many. Others I bought on a whim turned into solid little businesses. You don't really know until you try. And trying means building something, even if it's basic.

The truth is, a developed domain with even modest traffic is easier to sell than an undeveloped one. Period. Buyers can see the potential realized instead of imagining it. That's valuable, even if you're not planning to run the business long-term.

Should domainers be developers? I think domainers should do whatever makes sense for their portfolio and skills. For me, that includes development. For someone else, maybe not. But this idea that the two are mutually exclusive or that development somehow makes you "not a real domainer" is ridiculous.

Try developing one domain. See what happens. If you hate it, you learned something and you've got better screenshots for your listing. If you like it, you just opened up a whole new dimension to your business.

Either way, let's retire this gatekeeping nonsense about what domainers should or shouldn't do. Do what you want. Do what you like. Do what works for you.
 
39
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains — AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains — AI Storefront
Its perception as usual in these cases because the domain only crowd are almost never anti-development. Its the opposite.

I'm pro development for end-users 100%. I never buy a domain for investment purposes and develop on it. I want potential buyers to always know one thing about this domain - it is for sale. Many opposed to not developing their domain assets have developed numerous sites for their own private purposes. For example, I developed a personal dotcom portfolio site to manage my domains and shift away from third party seller platforms.

Standing out doesn't require more than a BIN and parked page for the right domain and right buyer. The right domain stands on its own and a sales lander is practical enough. Some buyers get confused when they come across a developed domain and think immediately its not for sale.

Seeking a definition for Domainer versus non-Domainer isn't gate keeping but trying to define a term not well understood outside of domain investing.

I'm with the crowd that believes investment-grade domains should be left for development by end-users. Driving cross-country you will see acres upon acres of undeveloped, fertile land for sale. I want to be the guy with undeveloped prime fertile digital land.

Let the end-users envision the future they want to build.
 
1
•••
When I bought my first domain names, I bought them solely to build something on them - one was a blog, another was a forum, and another was a service. For example, when you buy cookies (.) com, you expect it to actually sell cookies, right?

I remember the old SEO days when some domainers created AdSense + content websites for their domain portfolios because it performed better than traditional parking.
 
1
•••
I am one of those Domainers who’s always looking to develop his names 😉
 
4
•••
It would make sense, if you were serious about domaining, to learn the ins and outs of website development as it pertains to domain investing. It does open up other revenue stream opportunities for your investments.

However, as someone who has developed at least 100 domains, I've only sold one website and nearly all of these domains would not be considered "top quality" from a domain investor standpoint.

I've also found (from my own experience and others) that website developers do not make the best domain investors. This is because even though they may be tech-saavy, they lack other important qualities that ensure success in investing like business and brand knowledge, marketing, portfolio and wealth management, etc.
 
1
•••
Personally, my thoughts are that while a domain investor doesnt not need to be a developer to be successful, it's definitely helpful if one understands how a potential end user/start up will use/develop a domain asset they invested into for the purpose of reselling.

With that in mind, understanding the fundamentals of development and monetization, could help a domain investor make a more educated decision when it comes to establishing the potential value of a domain, possibly leveraging the 25% rule against a 12-month revenue projection.

To each their own though. We all do it differently. ;)
 
7
•••
Should domainers be developers?
Hi

should developers be domainers,

and if they were, then would "domaining" even be?

imo...
 
3
•••
I didn't get into this business to be a digital warehouse manager.
That says it all. I’ve developed a few of my domains—just landing pages—and received some very interesting queries. Your articles are a pleasure to read, especially as I’m not a native English speaker.
 
0
•••
While there might be some overlap, I see them as a completely different business.

It also depends what "development" means. If it means putting up some low quality mini-site, this isn't 2005.

Proper development requires a fair amount of time, money, and energy with often no return.

I have seen domain investors mention "development" when they have unsellable domains. In those cases, it's usually throwing good money after bad.

I would only develop something I had a passion for.

Brad
 
Last edited:
12
•••
Standing out requires more than a parked page and a BIN price.
If I were an end user searching for a potential name and came across a developed website on it, I’d naturally assume it’s already taken and in actuall use.

I wouldn’t waste time and money trying to persuade an established business to sell their domain.
 
Last edited:
11
•••
Standing out requires more than a parked page and a BIN price.
Another consideration is where to point the domain’s nameservers.

For example, if I want to keep the name listed in Atom Premium, the nameservers would need to point to them — which prevents me from simultaneously running a live site on the domain.

Certain brokers also require NS control.

Though, there could be workarounds for certain marketplaces.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I don't get this mentality at all. When I'm looking at a domain to buy, I'm already thinking about what could go there. What kind of site makes sense? Who's the audience? How would it make money? That's literally part of my decision process on whether to pull the trigger on a purchase. If I can't see a viable end user business, something I would develop or be interested in partnering in, I probably shouldn't be buying it anyway.

Aren't we capable of thinking what we would/could build, without building it? I don't think the anti- (or non-) development crowd is against that.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Absolutely!
 
1
•••
Aren't we capable of thinking what we would/could build, without building it? I don't think the anti- (or non-) development crowd is against that.
Many domain investors own thousands of domains.

At some point it's just not feasible to properly develop every domain.

Not to mention, many valuable domains are not really suited for development.

How are you going to develop a LLL, branding words, and things like that?

As others have pointed out, development can hinder sales. If that is your actual goal, then development might not be the right option.

Brad
 
Last edited:
10
•••
Domaining is actually great for people who have too many ideas and never execute any of them.
 
18
•••
How are you going to develop a LLL, branding words, and things like that?

As others have pointed out, development can hinder sales. If that is your actual goal, then development might not be the right option.

Brad
Here is an example of that.

I just sold WhiteBark in .com for around $11k.

It's a solid branding term, but how could I have developed that? A website on information about the tree?

Some domains are more suitable for development than others.

Brad
 
13
•••
I believe some domainers are pro-development because they don't like to be called squatters.
 
10
•••
I believe some domainers are pro-development because they don't like to be called squatters.
The same ones who have "development plans" for domains they have owned for 15+ years sitting idle. :)

Brad
 
Last edited:
11
•••
The same ones who have "development plans" for domains they have owned for 15+ years sitting idle. :)

Some publish those development "plans" on their landers to create urgency (or fake urgency). Acquire this domain now before I start developing it myself.
 
5
•••
Here is an example of that.

I just sold WhiteBark in .com for around $11k.

It's a solid branding term, but how could I have developed that? A website on information about the tree?

Some domains are more suitable for development than others.

Brad
Congrats on the sale...

My first thought would have been: WhiteBark = A new luxury white-chocolate brand, specializing in high-quality white-chocolate products :) - (For the hobbyist, that might mean a white-chocolate ecommerce populated with white-chocolate affiliate/commission products, maybe even a white-label partnership with drop-shipping.
 
2
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomDB
NameFit
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back