

dmblea said:I've been told it's not the size of the portfolio that matters, but more importantly, what you do with it![]()
B33R said:Quantity isn't important, quality is.
brindle123 said:I thought i was addicted until i read this thread, now i know i am. i have about 1500 domains. i'm going to try to get down to 1000. it's going to be tuff. i need an intervention.
I'm just hoping that is the case with at least a few of the 3000 that call me daddy.domainer50 said:Quality over quanity![]()
I'm so with you on this, but that will require some sort of 12 step program. If you find something that works, do tell...Binfus said:Have around 4000....the target for 2007 is to trim it down to about 1500.
B33R said:Quantity isn't important, quality is.
I've lost count of how many I own, more than 100 for sure. Spread across at least 10 registrars.
If you play the drop game, sometimes you have no choice but to have many names at different registrars.HBK216 said:I disagree with this strongly. What is the point to spreading across 10 registrars? This is how names get lost in the loop among other issues. 1-3 rock solid registrars should be more than enough.



