Somebody ought to send a copy of this thread to Alanis Morissette so she can write a song about irony. I would value Worth.info low to mid $X,XXX. On the plus side, it's short, commercial, and generic.
The main negative is the awkward fit between the keyword and the extension. As a proxy for goodness of fit with the .info extension I would put the following into a Google search "Worth info", "Worth information", "Information on Worth". "Worth info" comes up with just 766 uniques which is very low for a premium .info.
Another downside is that it's unlikely that somebody visiting Worth.info will buy something after getting the information they came for. For example, they might want to know how much something is worth but after you tell them they are more likely to want to sell it to you than buy something. The trick would be to monetize the desire to sell after finding out what something is worth (e.g via a pawnbroker) or sell the valuation itself (e.g jewellery valuation certification).
Using the domain for an MTV Cribs or Forbes Rich List type website would be interesting. I bought Tycoons.info with this use in mind. The problem is most rich lists are compiled at significant expense to promote a brand, e.g. Forbes magazine or The Times newspaper in the UK. It's not something that can be put together by an individual or small company.
One minor issue I noticed is that the trademark registration date used to register Worth.info is stated as 1 October 2000 in the .info WHOIS but 6 July 1993 on
www.uspto.gov. As a buyer, that would slightly concern me. I would want to check with the current owner of that trademark that they originally registered the name and then sold it on or speak to Afilias to double check they are satisfied that the original registration was legitimate.
