Just had one domain accepted for appraisal. I decided to give it a try but I didn't know that flippa will have to decide if that name can be posted up for appraisal. Took about a week until that name got approved. If I would know about this I would not post my name up for appraisal. Waste of time
-- It usually takes 2-5 days, tops. And all are accepted, unless they're defamatory.
Kill it with fire. I thought that was the plan. It's always going to be a low end attraction, which is a negative, not a positive for Flippa.
-- I have my agreements with this, as I have stated before; and yet, as you see above/below, people like
@muttus find value in the tool ...and thus, those people, and those very reasons of theirs, are why the tool exists, will continue to exist, and why the removal of the incentive is not as cut and dry as once thought.
If that's what we need to make Flippa appraisal more credible then why not? As long as the free listing per week exists, there will always be someone whose comment is "Wow! Great domain!" even without looking at the extension.
My suggestion is that you keep the free listing but limit it to one per month.
-- That's a possibility; what I think would be better, though, would be to reward appraisers based on honest and valuable feedback, like a points or "like" system. Perhaps greater account exposure could be part of that reward, instead of credits. However, for new domainers and new Flippa sellers in particular, credits are a welcome thing and we believe giving new sellers a risk-free sales trial is important. As far as the lack of quality of domains are concerned (with all the free credits), that's why we'll soon be showcasing our brokerage inventory separately, why we have Editors' Choice, Exclusives and why we work with sellers to provide subsidies on upgrades to promote their best inventory. Our continual aim is to make sure the best inventory on the platform is able to be seen.
Let me guess....you are still looking for, searching, thinking about, evaluating....
Please forgive me if I don't take your word as liquid gold.
For months Flippa has been informed about this practice, for months pros ( yeah..the main users of your marketplace ) have pointed out how ridiculous the system is ( for ALL reasons ) and yet nothing has changed. As expected.
If you don't mind me asking; who does make decisions there? And how long does it take for whoever is in charge to make a common sense based decision?
No wait...I got it....how could you get all those success fee otherwise....
Flippa domains : 07 / Jan / 2015
" As has been mentioned on other posts, we're soon discontinuing the appraisal credit/incentive "
-- I'm the one making the decision, and truth be told, it's about last on my list at this moment. My responsibility extends past making sure I handle something in a timely manner to suit your timestamps, and while I do think the credit provides problems, I've come around to a more nuanced position on this. For all the people who think the tool has fallen prey to scammers, I've heard from more who find use out of it, despite the credit incentive, as well as a sizable swath of people who deem this credit valuable in learning more about how to sell domains on our platform, for free. It's not perfect, nor will it ever be no matter what we do. But I do think the solution now spans further than just killing the credit; there are different ways to address the issues. As much as I value everyone's feedback on this, I appreciate the understanding that there is more in the product pipeline that we have a far greater and more time sensitive responsibility to address.
I am new to Domaining and I have to say that any input from the community is good, even if it is skewed.
For me the appraisal tool has 3 main dimensions which are equally important.
1) It allows to put my domain out and seek advice. This is of course the whole point, but the question is how this is achieved. If you get in a week 3 spammers just copy pasting exactly same answer to everybody, then the value is rather limited.
2) I want to get exposure to my profile and my listing so I could sell better. In this case having good name in appraisal is very good commercial, since I often check other listings of that person to look for a gem. But I do not see same feedback when appraising. I am dedicated and try to appraise about 100 names a week, regardless the quality, but as the system is set right now the reward is rather small. Redoing the system so one could get good exposure from HONEST appraising would definitely improve the quality and number of appraises
3) Free listing bonus. We all like this. Especially for person like me which has almost 0 experience with domains the ability to try to put your listing out there without being afraid to loose is priceless. Through this processes I can all learn what works and what does not and of course go to use flippa platform. In case of success sale Flippa will anyway collect their share, so it is always win win. And once I feel confident with both my gut and the marketplace 9 - 349 dollars will not be such a deal because I will be convinced that I can sell with profit.
So to your question, if I would be interested in appraisal tool without free listing is. YES and NO.
If the system is set the way that I get decent DIRECT exposure to my listings and appraisals received are somehow HONEST answers and not spam my answer is YES
If the system stay the way it is.I believe that the bonus is good option to have NO
The question for you is whether you can risk to loose all those potential customers like me, who right now do not have ton of money to spend, but which may have it after few successful sales. Even if 10 % of free listings help people to sell isn't it best commercial for your site?
Muttus
-- Case in point in my answer just above. There's more value for you as a new seller, despite potential pitfalls. Rewarding those that provide useful insights/thoughts/valuations, and having the copy/paste people drop off the page (en route to being suspended or removed entirely from the marketplace), while keeping the incentive credit (if not maybe modifying it's dispersal), is what we're looking towards now.