Dynadot

.tv What Fortune Magazine Says about .TV

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

SKG

Established Member
Impact
45
What Fortune Magazine Says about .TV and others

Here is what Fortune Magazine has to say:



Dot-tv gets a second chance at life
Back in 2000, the video-specific domain name didn't catch on, but now the time is right for a Web explosion, says Fortune's Adam Lashinsky.
FORTUNE Magazine
By Adam Lashinsky, Fortune senior writer
December 12 2006: 8:19 PM EST

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- What makes new media so damn entertaining is that yesterday's heroes all too often become today's goats. Yahoo (Charts) and eBay (Charts) could do no wrong two years ago. Today, not so much.

The flip-side is true as well. Social networking sites were the height of stupidity in the last blink of an eye. Today, if you don't get MySpace, LinkedIn and the like, well, you just don't get it.

The Web industry's latest topsy-turvy move revolves around dot-tv, a beaten down idea that's about to get a shot at rebirth.

Dot-tv last appeared on Webby radar screens as the domain name standard that the indefatigable idea man, Bill Gross, purchased at the height of the bubble from the island nation of Tuvalu. (Countries get their own suffixes, like .az and .il, and so on. Tuvalu's several thousand residents fared better by selling .tv to Gross's Idealab than by setting up their own email addresses.)

As was the case several times in his career, Gross was ahead of his time. A domain name devoted to videos wasn't that useful in 2000, and even less so when the music stopped. So he dished dot-tv to Verisign (Charts), which, among other things, runs the domain-parceling business Network Solutions.
Wake up and smell the copyright

Fast forward to 2006, the year of the online video generally and YouTube specifically, and suddenly dot-tv just might be worth something. Beginning Wednesday, Verisign will launch a new marketing program with a startup called Demand Media to leverage its dormant dot-tv property. (It actually runs the company it bought from Gross, .tv Corp.)

If you don't act fast, your opportunity to own "yournamehere.tv" might be gone in a flash. (That was just an illustrative example, by the way. Yournamehere.tv isn't available. Check www.tv to find out which names are.)

Turning on the bright lights of dot-tv is the brainchild of one of the Internet industry's fastest-rising hypesters, Richard Rosenblatt, the CEO of Demand, based in Santa Monica, Calif. Rosenblatt's the guy who ran Intermix, the previously - and currently - unknown company that housed a meteoric property called MySpace.com. Rosenblatt sold to Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (Charts). in 2005 for hundreds of millions of dollars and promptly started looking for his next gig.

The dot-tv marketing agreement with Verisign is Rosenblatt's biggest splash to date. That is, if you don't count the $220 million he's raised from venture capitalists to buy a motley collection of Web sites and mold them into an insta-media company. (He's already spent $150 million of the loot on nine acquisitions.)

Why would anyone want a Web site ending in the .tv suffix? Allow Rosenblatt to explain. "It's analogous to the way people used Geocities before individual domain names became popular," he says. In other words, back in the day, folks would create pages at Geocities, a site Yahoo bought for gobs of money and has become largely irrelevant. Geocities was cool, though, before people and companies realized they could have their own sites.

That's what Rosenblatt sees happening to dot-tv domain names, which he hopes people will refer to instead as "channels." Demand plans not only to drop the price of most dot-tv suffixes to $20 per year from their current rate of $50, but also to forge a giveaway promotion with big consumer Web sites to stoke the dot-tv fire.

Verisign's plan with Demand is much bigger than encouraging common folk to start their own video channels. By promoting dot-tv, it hopes to draw attention to the tens of thousands of premium dot-tv addresses, er, channels that are available for purchase. If the concept takes off, there's real money to be had there. (Hard to believe, but cars.tv can be yours for just $100,000 per year! Want books.tv? Fork over $30,000 a year and you can have it.)

The dot-tv gimmick makes a lot of sense. Even the most popular videos at YouTube have an arbitrary and confusing Web address that no self-respecting bedroom filmmaker wants to tell her posse about. With one's very own dot-tv address, someone expressing himself at YouTube can tell his new fans how to find his entire collection of videos.

The good people of Tuvalu just might end up regretting their long-ago decision to sell.


Here is what the Washington Post said:

Ex-MySpace chairman, Verisign to promote .tv sites

By Kenneth Li
Reuters
Wednesday, December 13, 2006; 12:39 AM

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The former chairman of MySpace.com is throwing his weight behind the ".tv" domain category, betting that it will gain popularity as more users watch, create and post videos online.

Richard Rosenblatt's Demand Media will unveil on Wednesday a deal with Internet security and dot-com registry VeriSign Inc. <VRSN.O> to begin marketing .tv as a preferred Web site domain for online videos, in the same way .org is used for non-profit groups.

Users can begin registering domain names from Demand at ChannelMe.tv on Wednesday.

Rosenblatt's broader plan begins next March, when Demand will provide users with Web software to upload and share homemade videos, grab professional content from licensed sources and blog -- potentially creating their own mini MySpaces.

"Video is becoming more personal," Rosenblatt, chairman and chief executive of Demand, said in an interview. "It's less about the big amorphous Web sites and more about people creating their own channel."

The explosion of video-sharing sites like YouTube, which Google Inc. <GOOG.O> purchased for $1.65 billion in November, highlight a growing interest in creating and viewing video on the Web.

Santa Monica, California-based Demand hopes users with .tv addresses will link them to pages they have already created on sites like MySpace or YouTube in order to simplify Web addresses that are otherwise hard to remember.

To date, .tv attracts mostly vanity Web sites and the odd Hollywood media site.

It has nowhere near the popularity of ".com," which is attached to nearly 60 million domains, according to VeriSign, the biggest company acting as a middleman for setting up such domains.

Rosenblatt is best known for brokering the sale of Intermix, which owned the popular social network Web site MySpace, to Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. <NWSa.N> last year for about $580 million.

In November, MySpace and other Fox Interactive Media Web sites collectively surpassed sites owned by Internet media leader Yahoo Inc. <YHOO.O> by U.S. page views, according to comScore Networks, an Internet measurement firm.

Fox sites had 39.5 billion page views, compared to Yahoo sites' 38 billion views, according to a UBS report on the comScore data.

Rosenblatt launched Demand Media in May, backed by about $220 million in funding from venture capital firms 3i Group Plc <III.L> and Oak Investment Partners. Spectrum Equity is also an investor.

His company has been snapping up small Web companies since May, including Hillclimb Media, which hosts travel, sports and outdoors sites, and Web site registrar eNom.

Demand aims to profit from buying up what is little more than unknown billboards sites on the Web and relaunching sites lie Grab.com, CasesLadder.com and flashgames.com with social networking and video capabilities that serve niche interests.
© 2006 Reuters
 
Last edited:
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
-WOW-

Great articles, great info, makes me tingly all over. I need another credit card, quick.
 
0
•••
Thanks SKG! I am even more pumped about .tv!
 
0
•••
to forge a giveaway promotion with big consumer Web sites to stoke the dot-tv fire.

I wonder which domains they will give away and to whom?

:wave:
 
0
•••
As I have previously mentioned I am not worrying about this great change I am just confident in Richard Rosenblatt's choice and his battle plan.
Great articles, should read more in the coming days. Thank you SKG.
 
0
•••
Wow, quite interesting. We knew video on the net was gonna take off. Was being discussed in this forum just a year ago. .TV and .MOBI are going to sustain themselves because of their very unique and special relevance to the internet's evolution. Good niche domain extensions.

I reg'd Houston back in 2002. Albuquerque a little later. Wish I had obtained more cities. When the door began to open last year I picked up BeachProperty, BeachHomes, and BeautifulWomen in .TV. We'll see.
 
0
•••
0
•••
Argos said:
As I have previously mentioned I am not worrying about this great change I am just confident in Richard Rosenblatt's choice and his battle plan.
Great articles, should read more in the coming days. Thank you SKG.


I agree ....I am gonna bunker down and wait for all gliches to work themselves out............

Rogue is not the only one with that tingly feeling!!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Well I will be the first one to say I was not overly thrilled about ENOM but in my idiocy I was really thinking of the old enom and with RosenBlatt the NEw ENOM seems like it is going to push the NEW . TV I had a talk with Scott Higgason who used to be the #1 man running .tv He told me he was interviewed by Demand Media and that they were really pumped about the .TV extension he decided to go to Domain Sponsor but said he felt good about Demand Media. Argos you were right you championed this move from day 1 congrats Jean Francois.

NOW I think those that got 70 % off really got THEE deal and moving forward people are going to think Remember when SKG got MR.tv for 70 % off and Millers got Education for 70 % off if they do a quasi RFP or even better Giveaway for some major premiums to major corps that will develop and promote the ext it is a major plus. IMO THANK YOU SKG GREAT POST
 
0
•••
Thanks everyone. From what I am understand from these articles is this.......it seems that Demand Media is going to push a platform with the extension. They have pointed out that the myspaces, bloggers and the like people make their respective pages under the wing of the mothership ie for example xyz.blogspot.com Now what Demand Media seems to be suggesting is why not control your own branding and own ie SKG.tv and if you register with them you can build a website/blog through there services in no time. I foresee them offering many tools in the future for this. It will be like a myspace filled with individual channels or vertical niches, GET IT? With Demand Media being vested in such promotion this has the potential to be huge, like Facebook, MySpace and the rest but even better. Once the public catches on and owns their own .tv they will search for other .tvs and type ins will increase. Once the public gets involved companies will follow just as government officials end up follow their constituents.

Of course this is my opinion but it makes clear sense. Looking back and the present some of the biggest online bloggers made and make significant revenues in the form of company advertising, etc. As Equity has pointed out many times, create your vertical small or big and you will be found:)
 
0
•••
0
•••
This is fantastic news and a great end to the year for us all.
 
0
•••
stoneroses said:
This is fantastic news and a great end to the year for us all.

Get yourself a dartboard Stoneroses......see if you hit bullseye!! Maybe a sign of things to come!!

Best wishes on your fantastic reg

James
 
0
•••
SKG said:
Thanks everyone. From what I am understand from these articles is this.......it seems that Demand Media is going to push a platform with the extension. They have pointed out that the myspaces, bloggers and the like people make their respective pages under the wing of the mothership ie for example xyz.blogspot.com Now what Demand Media seems to be suggesting is why not control your own branding and own ie SKG.tv and if you register with them you can build a website/blog through there services in no time. I foresee them offering many tools in the future for this. It will be like a myspace filled with individual channels or vertical niches, GET IT? With Demand Media being vested in such promotion this has the potential to be huge, like Facebook, MySpace and the rest but even better. Once the public catches on and owns their own .tv they will search for other .tvs and type ins will increase. Once the public gets involved companies will follow just as government officials end up follow their constituents.

Of course this is my opinion but it makes clear sense. Looking back and the present some of the biggest online bloggers made and make significant revenues in the form of company advertising, etc. As Equity has pointed out many times, create your vertical small or big and you will be found:)

SKG, this is exactly correct.

it is truly superb news for us.
 
0
•••
Thanks Sanchay, very good post, will add rep :)

This really looks very very good, looks like the future of .tv is in good hands with Demand Media.
 
0
•••
SKG said:
it seems that Demand Media is going to push a platform with the extension. They have pointed out that the myspaces, bloggers and the like people make their respective pages under the wing of the mothership ie for example xyz.blogspot.com Now what Demand Media seems to be suggesting is why not control your own branding and own ie SKG.tv


almost like an "uncensored" singular social network consisting of individual .tv sites
 
0
•••
This exactly the kind of leadership needed to push .TV to

the next level ... if they are really smart they will push .TV

to mobile users too and profit from the explosion

of TV channels for mobile coming ahead ... .TV CAN do it all.

:hehe:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
equity78 said:
Well I will be the first one to say I was not overly thrilled about ENOM but in my idiocy I was really thinking of the old enom and with RosenBlatt the NEw ENOM seems like it is going to push the NEW . TV I had a talk with Scott Higgason who used to be the #1 man running .tv He told me he was interviewed by Demand Media and that they were really pumped about the .TV extension he decided to go to Domain Sponsor but said he felt good about Demand Media. Argos you were right you championed this move from day 1 congrats Jean Francois.

Thank you Raymond, no merit on me, let say that sometimes a position may help to know a bit in advance or understand a bit better than others. ;)
Definitely this is a new era for the .tv., it is a winning outsider.
 
0
•••
Cheap articles, I hope they can prove it.
 
0
•••
MILLERSCROSSING said:
Get yourself a dartboard Stoneroses......see if you hit bullseye!! Maybe a sign of things to come!!

Best wishes on your fantastic reg

James

Thanks Millerscrossing, would be better if enom actually stopped fiddling with my servers( sounds like a gag from an old carry on movie),my site keeps getting turned into a parked page, to be fair the guy on the phone was helpful enough, he says migration will be complete at the end of day which for such a big task isn't to bad i suppose, but they better no mess with my servers again lol
 
0
•••
Cheap articles?

Stone they do that a lot ENOM not just for .tv

Either way this validates what the few who were here at the beginning always believed and now the bandwagon starting to get full
 
0
•••
You know what is funny, this fortune article is Sooooooooo similar to an article that inspired me to write my story yesterday: What TLD shows the most promise in the next year?
What is real funny, I think the article you linked to uses information from an earlier article, the one that inspired me! It is called "Giving the Audience Its Own Domain" (written by John Heilemann) Its from the same company, I got my information from a business 2.0 (a CNN company) story that has yet to be published online ( I got the mag a week ago), it is only in the december issue (I am a subscriber). It pretty much outlines Richard Rosenblatt and is business models for 2007. In my story I have posted some great links about .TV here they are from my thread:

If I had to Vote for one other domain, it might be.......
.TV
This year will see record low prices for .tv. Not only that you must check out ChannelMe.Tv - It is another Richard Rosenblatt invention. If you are a .TV fanatic, this site will start to drive massive user generated content for .TV in paticular!!! Please check it out! .Tv also plans a promotion with Myspace... sounds like Rosenblatts influence.

http://www.channelme.tv/

http://mashable.com/2006/12/12/youtubetv-anyone/

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/pr...1213&ID=6270807
 
Last edited:
0
•••
WOOOOHOOOOOO !!!!!

This is SO good to hear, I think finally .TV has the right people behind it and at the right time. This is a nice capoff to my year. I needed this news as I was getting a little skeptical about when the ext was going to gain popularity. My bet sometime around early 2008 perhaps we start seeing the masses becoming aware of .tv and what Demand Media is doing?

This ext definitely needed a shot in the arm and I think it has just gotten it. :)
 
0
•••
Verisign Press Release

VeriSign and Demand Media Join Forces to Promote .tv Domain Names
Strategic Agreement With Leading Online Media Company to Drive Broader Adoption of .tv Domain Names

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA and SANTA MONICA, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- December 13, 2006 -- VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN), the leading provider of intelligent infrastructure for the networked world, today announced a strategic alliance with Demand Media to leverage its industry relationships and Web 2.0 expertise to market the .tv Top Level Domain Name (TLD) as the preferred Web address for rich media content. VeriSign will continue to manage the underlying domain name registry for the .tv TLD, including the back end operations and management of the wholesale channel.

The .tv TLD reflects more than the location of a Web site, it reflects the content of that site -- in this case, a compelling and entertaining rich media destination.

"VeriSign is very excited to be working with Demand Media to promote .tv -- one of the most recognizable domain names in the world," said Mark McLaughlin, executive vice president, VeriSign. "By creating an intuitive destination for professional and user-generated video content, everyone from social networking communities to leading media portals can instantly attract consumers and new revenue opportunities. The alliance with Demand Media will increase the global visibility of the .tv TLD and its inherent brand value."

"The Internet media landscape is rapidly evolving and users want to publish and share their personal video content. By registering a .tv domain name and adding video content of their choosing, users can program their own channel," said Richard Rosenblatt, chairman and CEO, Demand Media. "We are thrilled to leverage the synergy of domain name registration and new media for the benefit of .tv registrants and Internet users worldwide."

The new alliance, which combines VeriSign's domain name registry expertise with Demand Media's innovative new media strategy, will offer companies new revenue streams and consumers more engaging experiences. For case studies and examples of companies and individuals who are using .tv, visit www.tv.

About Demand Media

The Demand Media™ proprietary media platform powers the company's unique content verticals and highly-trafficked domains and unique content verticals. The Company leverages cutting-edge, user-driven publishing, community and monetization tools in its quest to define the next generation of new media companies. The privately held company was founded in May and is based in Santa Monica, CA, with offices in San Francisco and Seattle, WA. For more information or to register a .tv name, visit channelme.tv.

About VeriSign

VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN), operates intelligent infrastructure services that enable and protect billions of interactions every day across the world's voice and data networks. Additional news and information about the company is available at www.verisign.com.

Forward-Looking Statement

Statements in this announcement other than historical data and information constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause VeriSign's actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements. The potential risks and uncertainties include, among others, the uncertainty of future revenue and profitability and potential fluctuations in quarterly operating results due to such factors as the risk that VeriSign's announced strategic relationships, including the relationship described herein, may not result in additional products, services, customers, profits or revenues; and increased competition and pricing pressures. More information about potential factors that could affect the company's business and financial results is included in VeriSign's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. VeriSign undertakes no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this press release.

VeriSign and other trademarks, service marks and logos are registered or unregistered marks of VeriSign, Inc. and its subsidiaries in the United States and in foreign countries. Copyright © 2006 VeriSign, Inc. All rights reserved.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back