What do you think of .cloud?

[Jman92]

From the little research I did, .cloud seems to be growing fast. What do you guys make of .cloud? if this topic has been discussed before, kindly post the link below. thank you.

 

[AMRO1001]

in the search field at the right upper corner if you type .cloud and click enter, you will find all the previous threads related to .cloud.

I have few, waiting, nothing yet....

 

[Jurgen Wolf]

Waste of money number N...

 

[Rick Ace]

.cloud seems to be stagnating again. Wouldn't jump into it atm.

 

[skyp]

to far away :D

 

[Jman92]

.cloud seems to be stagnating again. Wouldn't jump into it atm.

To your point, I checked their twitter feed for updates about their growth and they dont have a lot.

 

[Jman92]

to far away :D

I take it you are not a fan. :D:D

 

[skyp]

nah, look here his position
namestat.org/


if you get a really nice keyword like, ( my.cloud ) thats look nice

 

[1NiteStand]

too specific gTLD, I didn't reg or plan on getting a lot

 

[domix]

This will be a passing .cloud

 

[Jman92]

This will be a passing .cloud

 

[trp3]

Nothing for me, too specific to be honest

 

[Canadian]

too specific gTLD, I didn't reg or plan on getting a lot

Nothing for me, too specific to be honest

I think that "specificity" is one of the main features of new gTLD's that makes them desirable.

 

[1NiteStand]

true, but you have general specific and then you have general general

general specific -- specific gTLD
.cloud
.photo
.xxx
.store

general general -- general gTLD
.xyz
.global
.online

even one classed as GG can also work in GS and vice versa, for example

general in-between (can fit into specific and general, depends on the content of the domain or etc.)
.tech
.pro
.club
.store


at the end of the day these are all general top level domains (gTLD),

 

[1NiteStand]

.co is a ccTLD but many consider or use it like a gTLD.. so you could even consider .co a general gTLD..

 

[Dominium]

I will be surprised if it doesn't fade away like a passing.cloud

 

[Canadian]

true, but you have general specific and then you have general general

general specific -- specific gTLD
.cloud
.photo
.xxx
.store

general general -- general gTLD
.xyz
.global
.online

even one classed as GG can also work in GS and vice versa, for example

general in-between (can fit into specific and general, depends on the content of the domain or etc.)
.tech
.pro
.club
.store


at the end of the day these are all general top level domains (gTLD),

general specific
general general
general in-between

so where does "TOO SPECIFIC" fit in ?

too specific gTLD, I didn't reg or plan on getting a lot

 

[1NiteStand]

one mans specific is another mans general.

for me its too specific as is limited and useful to mostly only cloud based services or companies that specialize in cloud hosting or cloud something..surprise! or not.

 

[trp3]

I think that "specificity" is one of the main features of new gTLD's that makes them desirable.

You are right, but exactly that is the reason why I do not focus on this extension. It makes it desirable for someone who only wants to move on that niche, nothing more or less.

 

[dotplus]

LLL.cloud
08.cloud