WEB Site whether SEO friendly or not?

[rufryder]

(I posted this under another topic, however no replies, sorry if it upsets some)
I didn't know where to ask this question, therefore I"m asking it here since this is "webiste development" and mostly developers are probably hanging out around here. I'd like to get some feedback on my site whether its SEO friendly or not. On MSN, it's somewhat friendly, however I don't get much traffic on it and I'd like to add more links and stuff.

Any other tips? Whether there should be additional links or not? or more content, etc.?
thanks a lot for yourself.
Site in my signature or www.hostMYparty.com

 

[forumbulge]

Well it looks good.
But to ask yourself if its SE friendly, you have to ask if it has

keywords in titles
keywords in H tags
keywords in anchor links
keywords in alt tags
keyword targetted articles with correct density.

And thats just the start

 

[Amnezia]

Nice site but in terms of SEO there is a few more things you could do..

i think that the product pages could do with a mod rewrite. having all those variables and no keywords in the url isnt so good...also you will lose rank by having the products on a separate subdomain, you can use mod rewrite so that it cloaks to your domain.

for example you could use mod rewrite to rewrite this -
http://hostmyparty.makesparties.com...eCategoryID=902&intDisplayableProductID=10446

to this -
http://www.hostmyparty.com/Product-Name_902_10446

Few basic bits of SEO that are missing
1 - each page should have a different title.
2 - headings should be inclosed in <h1>...<h6> tags
3 - each pages should have a different description meta tag

 

[SiteBroker]

You could describe your services on your homepage, use this description to get your keywords in. Although on page seo is pretty much dead for google, it counts for alot more in msn and yahoo though. If like me you find using h1 h2 tags ugly and to large, make a css class to make them appear smaller. If h tags still hold much value is another thing anyway. Definately get rid of the id urls, as far as i know google dosent even bother with these anymore.