what has more value?
e.g. https://twitter.com/auction
or auction.com ?
even
usernames.org just sold on Flippa for $1,450
e.g. https://twitter.com/auction
or auction.com ?
even
usernames.org just sold on Flippa for $1,450
Last edited:
same for domains...Auction.Com
One who holds trademark of a brand (usually these people also hold a .com of that brand name) can contact these social sites and claim ownership of that term.
Let's say Walt Disney is the owner of Disney.Com and if someone else owns their handle on Twitter or Facebook or any other site, they can contact those social media sites and show them proof of ownership of that domain and they will be transferred that handle for their company use.
So the owner of a particular domain is the king, not the social media handle owner. Social media handle can be claimed anytime by trademark owners.
Auction.Com
One who holds trademark of a brand (usually these people also hold a .com of that brand name) can contact these social sites and claim ownership of that term.
Let's say Walt Disney is the owner of Disney.Com and if someone else owns their handle on Twitter or Facebook or any other site, they can contact those social media sites and show them proof of ownership of that domain and they will be transferred that handle for their company use.
So the owner of a particular domain is the king, not the social media handle owner. Social media handle can be claimed anytime by trademark owners.
Auction.Com
One who holds trademark of a brand (usually these people also hold a .com of that brand name) can contact these social sites and claim ownership of that term.
Let's say Walt Disney is the owner of Disney.Com and if someone else owns their handle on Twitter or Facebook or any other site, they can contact those social media sites and show them proof of ownership of that domain and they will be transferred that handle for their company use.
So the owner of a particular domain is the king, not the social media handle owner. Social media handle can be claimed anytime by trademark owners.
Domains will have authority over any third party usernames, social media handles are illegal to sell on most successful social networks. Not worth the headache, look at Rand Fishkins' domainsherpa episode. Business owners will eventually have their website as a home base, as it should be. Social networks are just for noise and crossmarketing imho.
You're getting confused with domains and trademarks. A trademark can be used to claim a Twitter handle, I've done it before. A domain, you cannot. It proves nothing and proves no legal right to a name in trade.Auction.Com
One who holds trademark of a brand (usually these people also hold a .com of that brand name) can contact these social sites and claim ownership of that term.
Let's say Walt Disney is the owner of Disney.Com and if someone else owns their handle on Twitter or Facebook or any other site, they can contact those social media sites and show them proof of ownership of that domain and they will be transferred that handle for their company use.
So the owner of a particular domain is the king, not the social media handle owner. Social media handle can be claimed anytime by trademark owners.