- Impact
- 2,712
After google decision is it worth investing in xyz extension? Will it's value increase?


This is nothing new. Companies have been registering other then .COM domains for a long time (mostly defensive).
But for the sake of argument, I would like to point out that Facebook, Google, Amazon, Overstock, Godaddy, Taco Bell, and many other larger companies have and use .CO domain names.
FB (dot) CO (forwards to FaceBook)
TA (dot) CO (forwards to Taco Bell)
G (dot) CO (is used by Google along with GOO (dot) GL)
A (dot) CO (forwards to Amazon)
O (dot) CO (forwards to Overstock... and they even attempted to re-brand with it at one time)
What you have pointed out is useless because these kinds of registrations have been made across a wide variety of domain extensions. We mostly refer to them as "defensive registrations" and it a sticking point for some of the people here who think that nTLDs are conning large corporations/businesses out of $$$ for defensive
registrations.
Let me bring this full circle so that there is no misunderstanding here. The moment one of these *BIG* companies (lets say XYZ since we are under that thread) uses a given extension for *MAJOR* project or re-brand is the moment that the nTLD will be thrust into the spotlight.
For this to happen (which Overstock tried and failed), it would require a massive amount of capital being invested into this entity.
For all your arguments, Google has not invested intensively
into XYZ... it made a landing page.
FaceBook utilized one of their programmers domain name as a portal for a live feed... once!
Other sites have redirects to their normal .COM sites which can be seen across many extensions.
Nothing listed above is going to reshape the domain extensions as we know it. It will take a full on capital investment either for a new start up that takes off or for a total re-brand of an existing company.
Probably not best to hold your breath for a re-brand.
With startups.... they have literally thousands of extensions to chose from.
Many people will argue that .IO is the extension for startups.
The point is that it can be any extension out there and could happen (if it does) at any time.
Dont waste your time or money registering second tier domain names. If you are going to play the nTLD game... do yourself a favor and ONLY register category killer domain names. If they are not available in a given extension... they another extension.... there are hundreds/thousands out there with more to come.
*Edit* "Rick Schwartz Invested in .XYZ !!!"
Rick Schwartz has also invested in many other extensions. XYZ is only one extension. Didnt he also have Flowers (dot) Mobi in which he got burned on big time?
Just saying
Cheers
This is nothing new. Companies have been registering other then .COM domains for a long time (mostly defensive).
But for the sake of argument, I would like to point out that Facebook, Google, Amazon, Overstock, Godaddy, Taco Bell, and many other larger companies have and use .CO domain names.
FB (dot) CO (forwards to FaceBook)
TA (dot) CO (forwards to Taco Bell)
G (dot) CO (is used by Google along with GOO (dot) GL)
A (dot) CO (forwards to Amazon)
O (dot) CO (forwards to Overstock... and they even attempted to re-brand with it at one time)
What you have pointed out is useless because these kinds of registrations have been made across a wide variety of domain extensions. We mostly refer to them as "defensive registrations" and it a sticking point for some of the people here who think that nTLDs are conning large corporations/businesses out of $$$ for defensive registrations.
Let me bring this full circle so that there is no misunderstanding here. The moment one of these *BIG* companies (lets say XYZ since we are under that thread) uses a given extension for *MAJOR* project or re-brand is the moment that the nTLD will be thrust into the spotlight.
For this to happen (which Overstock tried and failed), it would require a massive amount of capital being invested into this entity.
For all your arguments, Google has not invested intensively into XYZ... it made a landing page.
FaceBook utilized one of their programmers domain name as a portal for a live feed... once!
Other sites have redirects to their normal .COM sites which can be seen across many extensions.
Nothing listed above is going to reshape the domain extensions as we know it. It will take a full on capital investment either for a new start up that takes off or for a total re-brand of an existing company.
Probably not best to hold your breath for a re-brand.
With startups.... they have literally thousands of extensions to chose from.
Many people will argue that .IO is the extension for startups.
The point is that it can be any extension out there and could happen (if it does) at any time.
Dont waste your time or money registering second tier domain names. If you are going to play the nTLD game... do yourself a favor and ONLY register category killer domain names. If they are not available in a given extension... they another extension.... there are hundreds/thousands out there with more to come.
*Edit* "Rick Schwartz Invested in .XYZ !!!"
Rick Schwartz has also invested in many other extensions. XYZ is only one extension. Didnt he also have Flowers (dot) Mobi in which he got burned on big time?
Just saying
Cheers
I agree, re-mark It is not an option for established companies, but for new businesses is the best option, until now, many services and domains (.com, .co ) are monopolized by a few companies, but internet markets are growing always, We have not seen everything you would expect from a search engine, video website, online shopping, cloud and other products and services, so think that the game will not change It is like saying that internet is always what it is today.
About IO, IO is assigned to the British Indian Ocean Territory, like .co to Colombia, but .xyz not mean anything.
What I see ?
I see Fear.
like what ?imo
.xyz is in the same category as .top. Over 90% of my spam comes from a .xyz domain.
There are better places to put your money than .xyz.
like what ?
.xyz is the Number one GTLD so hang your hats on that fact
Strategy. ( I think )
e.g : LTD.com vs LTD. any extension
LTD.com = Reserve Auction Price +55,555
But obviously the final price will be much higher, So not all businesses have that money to burn on a domain name, but also, it should be added the cost of developing your software, plus hosting, plus advertising, in the end, will most likely that the domain name cost more than your own software, see a clear example of sex.com Bankruptcy.
This is the business of .com, High prices that end up destroying business, good domains with garbage service. Not thanks.
What are you even taking about. Hosting, advertising, developing software, whatever goes into running a business, is across the board. It'll be harder for advertising when you're on some extension nobody has heard of, that might leak traffic to a .com etc. Some businesses can afford higher priced domains. For those that can't, you can get good domains for a few thousand or make up some name for reg fee.



