- Impact
- 95
Have spent today emailing potential end users - have had three replies already saying that normally they would be interested, but due to the recent algorithm update they have no interest/need...
Have spent today emailing potential end users - have had three replies already saying that normally they would be interested, but due to the recent algorithm update they have no interest/need...
Google is not going to devalue a quality site based on using an EMD.
It is in Google's best interest to provide high quality results.
If you are an end user who sells flowers in Chicago, and your domain is ChicagoFlowers.com, that simply explains your business.
Google is looking to remove garbage sites based on EMD.
So when you say your long established sites were pushed down the order, what is the quality of your competitors sites that replaced you at the top?Actually they have done exactly that to me - long established sites with plenty of original relevant content, not domainer sites.
For the EMD query they have totally disappeared from search results. For other queries their position in results is unchanged.
This would never have happened if most EMDs did not fall on domainers' hands. Domainers gave EMDs a bad reputation, which triggered Matt Cutts to tweak his algo. It's just like when scammers invaded the .BIZ tld, everyone else have shun them altogether as spammy.IMO Google wants to provide high quality results for major businesses, not small players. It seems to me every change just pushes Amazon and other big American business players up in the search results. Yes big players tend not to use EMD.
:talk:
lol
that response sounds more like it would come from another domainer.
domainers are the one group who will panic, and become confused, whenever they think the sky is falling or something is raining on their parade.
as such is the case with every report of Big G changing some shiz-zit around.
a true end-user who really has plans for development, would not use such a lame excuse.
unless, they were playing jedi mind tricks on you
imo...
That's a no-contest comparison.ChicagoFlowers.com is a very good name.
EMD like ChicagoFlowerShopInMagnificentMile.com would become less valuable.
They are now more comfortable settling on the other extensions, or attaching some nifty word infront of the domain like "the" or "my". That's because they realized domainers are now unable to rank their stuffs high on search engines. And if domainers can't sell their stuff, their own "less than perfect" domains are safe on top of search.End users are getting smarter.
Thanks for thinking of me, but I'm having a huge problem right now due to the Google Exact Match Domain modification of their search algo.
I hope your site isn't being killed as mine is, but since you have an exact match domain, I fear you're losing traffic as I am. (100,000 page views a month before, lucky to get 40-50,000 now. Nothing has changed, just Google's algo.)
So, while I would love to add XXX.com to my stable of domains, I'm can't even think of it right now.
Cheers and good luck,
XXX
Google doesn't want crappy sites to rank at the top, this makes sense to me, maybe this will push domainers to develop better sites... Most domainer sites really suck, I wouldn't rank them highly either..
Happened to me a few times. Say for example, i own "phantom dot com" (just an example). Buyer didn't like my asking price. So he got "thephantom dot com" for just reg fee. Now he ranks on top of search, because he is more focused developing content for this single domain, while i'm too busy with my 400+ domains.
use bing
The bottom line is: Google isn't everything. I'm glad I learned that early in the game. Keep domaining and continue on. They'll need more of our money soon and they'll change their "make up our own rules on a whim when need-be" attitude.