The USA Political Thread

[lennco]

Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun

:wave:

 

[mr-x]

When you leave the safe confines of a Trump rally and get into the real world.

Safe confines of a Trump rally = Nevada to Florida.

Liberals patting themselves on the back and high-fiving for acting like people they say are awful. You notice there weren't any conservatives outside looking for an opportunity to assault people leaving.

 

[mr-x]

Well in order for you to see it you will have to open your eyes.

Pelosi caved and will hold a vote to establish rules and due process. No more secret chamber b/s.

 

[GILSAN]

 

[mr-x]

Good thread by editor of redstate.com on why democrats are not worth a vote in 2020:

https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019...-to-2020-dems-in-one-perfectly-stated-thread/

 

[JB Lions]

just released a few minutes ago from guy testifying tomorrow:

READ: White House Ukraine expert's opening statement says he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/politics/wh-ukraine-expert-opening-statement/

 

[mr-x]

NP's resistance propaganda report.

Sondland Told House Panels Trump's Ukraine Pressure Was Quid Pro Quo
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...essure-was-quid-pro-quo/ar-AAJpoxS?li=BBnb7Kz

----------
North Korea says it's running out of patience with US
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...out-of-patience-with-us/ar-AAJpEMY?li=BBnbfcL
------------
Trump frustrated as White House effort to defy impeachment inquiry fails to halt witness testimony, advisers say
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-testimony-advisers-say/ar-AAJmZl7?li=BBnb7Kz

Cleared my bookmarks

 

[.X.]

oops, hits just keep on coming, evidence that @.X. pretends doesn't exist. Will just add this to the already existing pile of evidence. This is happening tomorrow:

Army Officer on White House Staff Reported Concerns on Trump’s Ukraine Dealings

"A White House national security official who is a decorated Iraq war veteran plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he heard President Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman of the Army, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, twice registered internal objections about how Mr. Trump and his inner circle were treating Ukraine, out of what he called a “sense of duty,” he plans to tell the inquiry, according to a draft of his opening statement obtained by The New York Times..........

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...oncerns-on-trumps-ukraine-dealings/ar-AAJuZ02

I don't pretend it doesn't exist, I simply want an official to show Americans the discovery evidence and hear it from an official, not the media, not a forum or people speculating.

After years of accusations, It is game time @JB Lions , Its time to put up or shut up, Prove the accusations with evidence that will bring a conviction of criminal misconduct. the time is now.

 

[mr-x]

We have the transcript of the call.

You said Trump and his chief of staff admitted to a crime on national TV. Why all this bother if any of that were true? Why not just hold a vote for impeachment?

just released a few minutes ago from guy testifying tomorrow:

READ: White House Ukraine expert's opening statement says he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/politics/wh-ukraine-expert-opening-statement/

 

[mr-x]

Fixed it for you.

'We stand united against Trump': ALMOST A DOZEN Protesters flock outside Trump Tower in Chicago

 

[JB Lions]

Fixed it for you.

I fixed your lying for you:

"Thousands gathered outside the hotel Monday morning and afternoon chanting things like "Trump, Pence out now" while holding signs calling for the president's impeachment. Officers at the scene estimated as many as 3,000 protesters were present."

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loc...de-Chicagos-Trump-Tower-Police-563995411.html

-------------

We have the transcript of the call.

You said Trump and his chief of staff admitted to a crime on national TV. Why all this bother if any of that were true? Why not just hold a vote for impeachment?

? Evidence on top of evidence, doesn't end. Video is true, it's on........wait for it.........VIDEO @.X. VIDEO. Slow Trump supporters

 

[JB Lions]

just released a few minutes ago from guy testifying tomorrow:

READ: White House Ukraine expert's opening statement says he reported concerns about Trump-Zelensky call

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/28/politics/wh-ukraine-expert-opening-statement/

Since I know you guys won't read it, I'll quote the relevant parts, first-hand knowledge btw:

"The meeting proceeded well until the Ukrainians broached the subject of a meeting between the two presidents. The Ukrainians saw this meeting as critically important in order to solidify the support of their most important international partner. Amb. Sondland started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific investigations in order to secure the meeting with the President, at which time Ambassador Bolton cut the meeting short.

Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb. Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son had nothing to do with national security, and that such investigations were not something the NSC was going to get involved in or push. Dr. Hill then entered the room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate..............

I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC's lead counsel."

Then we still might have Bolton testify, haha.

 

[mr-x]

Striking public school teachers.... dozens. "a lively crowd" with counter protesters.

I fixed your lying for you:

"Thousands gathered outside the hotel Monday morning and afternoon chanting things like "Trump, Pence out now" while holding signs calling for the president's impeachment. Officers at the scene estimated as many as 3,000 protesters were present."

 

[.X.]

We have the transcript of the call.

You said Trump and his chief of staff admitted to a crime on national TV. Why all this bother if any of that were true? Why not just hold a vote for impeachment?

It has been said sooo sooo many times the last couple of years that the President has incriminated himself

Pelosi and her posse better bring the goods, and i don't think they have any goods. none

That is essentially why there will be no vote to impeach , not now, not later.

 

[JB Lions]

@mr-x - You do understand the obvious don't you? It was a dumb question you asked earlier. Why all the bother you asked. It's evidence on top of evidence, many different sources, transcripts, video, text messages, from many different people. It doesn't stop coming, it's a pretty clear case. It's hard to vote against a pretty clear case.

 

[mr-x]

Weird his testimony is available before he testifies. Almost like the democrats are trying to get control of the news cycle.

Since I know you guys won't read it, I'll quote the relevant parts, first-hand knowledge btw:

"The meeting proceeded well until the Ukrainians broached the subject of a meeting between the two presidents. The Ukrainians saw this meeting as critically important in order to solidify the support of their most important international partner. Amb. Sondland started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific investigations in order to secure the meeting with the President, at which time Ambassador Bolton cut the meeting short.

Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb. Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son had nothing to do with national security, and that such investigations were not something the NSC was going to get involved in or push. Dr. Hill then entered the room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate..............

I was concerned by the call. I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government's support of Ukraine. I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained. This would all undermine U.S. national security. Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC's lead counsel."

Then we still might have Bolton testify, haha.

 

[JB Lions]

Weird his testimony is available before he testifies.

It's called an opening statement, just like others have presented. Try actually reading it. Testimony is tomorrow, didn't I just post that?

 

[mr-x]

Right. Nobody cares but TDS addicts.

@mr-x - You do understand the obvious don't you? It was a dumb question you asked earlier. Why all the bother you asked. It's evidence on top of evidence, many different sources, transcripts, video, text messages, from many different people. It doesn't stop coming, it's a pretty clear case. It's hard to vote against a pretty clear case.

So many opinions and words! Trump must be guilty of something!

 

[.X.]

I fixed your lying for you:

"Thousands gathered outside the hotel Monday morning and afternoon chanting things like "Trump, Pence out now" while holding signs calling for the president's impeachment. Officers at the scene estimated as many as 3,000 protesters were present."

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loc...de-Chicagos-Trump-Tower-Police-563995411.html

-------------


? Evidence on top of evidence, doesn't end. Video is true, it's on........wait for it.........VIDEO @.X. VIDEO. Slow Trump supporters

Then why not just have the Impeachment vote Friday??

 

[mr-x]

It's called an opening statement, just like others have presented. Try actually reading it. Testimony is tomorrow, didn't I just post that?

Your Honor, I rest my case.

 

[JB Lions]

Right. Nobody cares but TDS addicts.



So many opinions and words! Trump must be guilty of something!

Yes Dummy. haha, how many times has that been posted now? I've lost count.

Your Honor, I rest my case.

My God, you're beyond clueless sometimes. Cohen, Mueller, Volker, Taylor.............etc. All had opening statements released first. Where have you been last few months?

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=opening+statement+before+testimony